Music Reviews Music News Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Music & Musician Forums > Discussion > Community > Politics, News, and World Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-30-2006, 04:38 PM   #1
neal_672
Mx Bob Dylan Obsessive
 
neal_672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 8,656
French Artist Censorship

http://www.nme.com/news/Monsieur-R/23193

After reading the article i have to say i'm a little shocked at the restrictions on an artists freedom of expression. The lyrics reflect his personal (if somewhat idiotic) views against "the system" ( ) and it seems slightly ****ed up that the government can prevent him from expressing his views through an artistic medium purely on the basis that someone impressionable may or may not hear it.

Anyhoo, discuss and all that jazz
neal_672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 05:02 PM   #2
-1up!-
Postmodern unwillingly
 
-1up!-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,152
Censorship stinks. The Minister is taking a worrying step in negating that artist's freedom of speech.

Last edited by -1up!-; 05-30-2006 at 05:08 PM.
-1up!- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 05:07 PM   #3
LittlePound
i want to tap your tenors
 
LittlePound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: under HIS grace
Posts: 2,869
it's stupid that he's getting in trouble for expressing his views. BUt making animal photographsographic material availiabe to minors through his material should get him in trouble.
LittlePound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 05:18 PM   #4
neal_672
Mx Bob Dylan Obsessive
 
neal_672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 8,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittlePound
it's stupid that he's getting in trouble for expressing his views. BUt making animal photographsographic material availiabe to minors through his material should get him in trouble.
The point is though that the parents/point of sale should step in at this point to stop a young child buying it, but by sending him to prison they're just damaging not only his career but his rights to freely express himself.
neal_672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 05:23 PM   #5
LittlePound
i want to tap your tenors
 
LittlePound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: under HIS grace
Posts: 2,869
yeah i dont' agree for him being sent to jail, and it is the parents responsability for what hte child buys, but it's also others (ex. The store owner, or the government that makes the laws) responsibility to make sure that it couldn't even possibly fall into the hands of a child, regardless of the parents.
LittlePound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 05:57 PM   #6
Reaganista
ill be ur dog
 
Reaganista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: come to u when u call me
Posts: 29,158
hey france keep criticizing the US
Reaganista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 06:34 PM   #7
-1up!-
Postmodern unwillingly
 
-1up!-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,152
Yes, so Tway can keep on bitching Euros for the sake of it...
-1up!- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 06:35 PM   #8
italic zero
klik
 
italic zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,353
That guy callled it 'pornographic,' but I doubt it actually is.
italic zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:17 PM   #9
Curtis89
music, etc
 
Curtis89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittlePound
yeah i dont' agree for him being sent to jail, and it is the parents responsability for what hte child buys, but it's also others (ex. The store owner, or the government that makes the laws) responsibility to make sure that it couldn't even possibly fall into the hands of a child, regardless of the parents.
Thats not definately not the government's responsibility.
Curtis89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:20 PM   #10
Chrizzle fo' Shizzle
Its the groovicide bomber
 
Chrizzle fo' Shizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: she a stunna
Posts: 4,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by neal_672
The point is though that the parents/point of sale should step in at this point to stop a young child buying it, but by sending him to prison they're just damaging not only his career but his rights to freely express himself.
Are you kidding? This guy's getting major street cred. His lyrics are so gangster they got him in JAIL
Chrizzle fo' Shizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:44 PM   #11
:amaze:
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curtis89
Thats not definately not the government's responsibility.

if the government is the one saying it's not ok for minors to access it, they should be the ones restricting the access.




:amaze: is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 03:42 AM   #12
Slapping Penguin
Optimus Prime
 
Slapping Penguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Autobots Transform and Roll Out!
Posts: 1,922
Quote:
hey france keep criticizing the US
You are a pathetic child. Because the US HAS NEVER done something similar.
Slapping Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:53 AM   #13
Reaganista
ill be ur dog
 
Reaganista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: come to u when u call me
Posts: 29,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapping Penguin
You are a pathetic child. Because the US HAS NEVER done something similar.
not in the past 80 years we haven't.
Reaganista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:56 AM   #14
-1up!-
Postmodern unwillingly
 
-1up!-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,152
Freedom Fries, anyone?
-1up!- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:59 AM   #15
Reaganista
ill be ur dog
 
Reaganista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: come to u when u call me
Posts: 29,158
um

the senate changing the name of a food is not even remotely similar to the french government jailing detractors.

actually not even remotely similar isn't a strong enough phrase.

it's completely ****ing irrelevant
Reaganista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:00 PM   #16
-1up!-
Postmodern unwillingly
 
-1up!-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,152
no it's the same thing

oh, what am I saying? You know better
-1up!- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:03 PM   #17
Reaganista
ill be ur dog
 
Reaganista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: come to u when u call me
Posts: 29,158
you have got to be the stupidest person on the planet.

the senate changed their lunch menu

the french threw a guy in jail for criticising them

explain the similarity
Reaganista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:09 PM   #18
-1up!-
Postmodern unwillingly
 
-1up!-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,152
I could explain, but you're Tway.
-1up!- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:11 PM   #19
Reaganista
ill be ur dog
 
Reaganista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: come to u when u call me
Posts: 29,158
oh so you're just talking ****, that's good to know.

now go away
Reaganista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:22 PM   #20
PerpetualBurn
Like a greasy chip butty
 
PerpetualBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Highway 61 (again)
Posts: 9,447
Sorry, 1up, but you're on a loser. Arresting peaceful civilians is different to giving the lunch menu non-partisan names.
PerpetualBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.