PNWI Community Thread version 3.0 (KEEP REFRIGERATED AT ALL TIMES)

[Smokey D]

possibly. my point was why would you go after the state and not the hospital.

there's probably some immunity provision for the hospital in the statute.

or maybe she did go after the hosptial too as the thing Ron posted was a strike out decision not a full judgment.

[1338 h4x0r]

I'm gonna make a music video for Telstar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryrEPzsx1gQ

it's gonna have nuclear test shots and rocket artillery on parade and footage of "Chicken" being played paired with Krushchev banging a shoe and all kinds of fun stuff

[1338 h4x0r]

formation of Stukas diving, followed by Saturn V (built by great American scientists) lifting off

[RouteOne]

Originally Posted by Smokey D

possibly. my point was why would you go after the state and not the hospital.

there's probably some immunity provision for the hospital in the statute.

or maybe she did go after the hosptial too as the thing Ron posted was a strike out decision not a full judgment.

she was arguing that the hospital was an actor of the state

[Smokey D]

way i read it, she was saying action had the imprimatur of the state, which would have meant she could sue the state for infringing her civil rights.

but it seems easier, unless there's some defence or statutory exemption i don't know about, to go after the hospital for directly false imprisonment.

[Holy War]

http://youtu.be/8P5tIxg4VDg

stewart oreilly debate

[RouteOne]

Originally Posted by Smokey D

way i read it, she was saying action had the imprimatur of the state, which would have meant she could sue the state for infringing her civil rights.

but it seems easier, unless there's some defence or statutory exemption i don't know about, to go after the hospital for directly false imprisonment.

the hospital was a private entity and was not acting on behalf of the state


the state gives the private entities/individuals discretion on whether or not to involuntarily commit an individual. It does not do it itself.

[RouteOne]

and I don't think it even gets near false imprisonment for a reason I forgot but know exists under mental health law

[Smokey D]

the state gives the private entities/individuals discretion on whether or not to involuntarily commit an individual. It does not do it itself.

Yeah, that's what the case says but she was arguing the opposite.

and I don't think it even gets near false imprisonment for a reason I forgot but know exists under mental health law

it would qualify as false imprisonment in NZ subject to some rule in the legislation or maybe some kind of colour of right defence.

[1338 h4x0r]

my new file sharing service deletes anything that has more or less the same name as something that was deleted previously, which means that I can't just .rar deleted files like I did on Mediafire

so now I have a system of encrypted, compressed sobriquet files with names like BDA98A93B215D5EE470A.7z that is seamlessly integrated into my industrial scale pirating system—e.g. when I upload "BDA98A93B215D5EE470A.7z" to Blogger, the title will appear correctly in the post

suck on it, how's that feel?

[Smokey D]

You know your real name can be connected with your mx account right?

[RouteOne]

It can when people say your full name in a post and you google it

[RouteOne]

smokey want to be facebook friends

[Smokey D]

It can when people say your full name in a post and you google it

yeah that's my point. as his legal adviser, I recommend Chris stop confessing to felony copyright infringement.

smokey want to be facebook friends

i don't have facebook

[RouteOne]

why not don't you want to be cool???

[Smokey D]

i'm so cool i've transcended facebook.

[RouteOne]

I want to delete it because most people I know have either gotten fat or have ugly children



or they talk about the latest furniture they bought




when did people become so boring

[Smokey D]

ugh, children

[1338 h4x0r]

Originally Posted by Smokey D

You know your real name can be connected with your mx account right?

probably not but in any case I'm getting it changed to something inconspicuous and effectively unsearchable

sort of like how my new YouTube account is named "Muhammad al-Khwarizmi"

good luck tracing that

nice try Smokey

[Smokey D]

erm, the government keeps records of name changes.