Quote:
Originally Posted by AKid2
I think we've got them packed in as tightly as we can.
|
Hardly.
Quote:
The real issue here is meat production itself. Meat consumption parallels economic development, and not necessarily health.
|
Well, meat is very good for you, so I would say it does have something to do with health.
Quote:
Meat is terribly inefficient;
|
No it isn't.
Quote:
cattle use 70% of US grain and 50% of US water. It'll take 8 pounds of grain to produce one pound of beef. An acre of spinach produces 26 times as much protein as an acre of grazing cattle. Etc.
|
Not sure about the grain statistic (even though I do know we export lots of our grain anyhow), but I do believe your water statistic is wrong. If I recall correctly, the largest uses of water are for field irrigation and thermoelectric power, not watering livestock. So actually, it is your fields that use more water than cattle.
Quote:
It's much less resource intensive to eat non meat products, that's why developing countries do it.
|
Good for them. I will keep eating meat because 1) I like it and 2) it is healthy for you.
Also, it actually kills less animals than farming.