study catches two bird populations as they split into seperate species

[burtonbassist_101]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090714104000.htm

pretty interesting stuff.

[1338 h4x0r]

Macroevolution is a lie, js

[Against Miik!]

Jews did evolution

But seriously not saying I'm a creationist or anything (I'm mean really, I wanna stress that), but its a pretty bad sign for macroevolution when this kind of stuff is news. I mean, new species coming from other species is kind of the cornerstone of the theory, so really it should be like everywhere. I don't mean happening around us, but in fossil records n ****.

That sounds like a cookie cutter creationist argument, and really, it is their only sound one.

[Pop music sucks]

I was listening to college radio and they had a broadcast on there about the troubles of finding in-transit speciation. It was just friendly debate and discourse between two biologists. One brought up the notion that if the Earth suddenly had an E.L.E and some sort of alien species were performing their own archaeological digs around metropolii and had found the bones of a Golden Retriever and a chiwawa, it would be easy to see that they were similar, except on the basis of scale. To those aliens, it would seem to be that the Golden Retriever and a Chiwawa would be on their way to speciation and had to have diverged from a common ancestor.

[1338 h4x0r]

http://www.vof.se/forum/viewtopic.php?p=273544#p273544

@ Miik

[Against Miik!]

Do you have special folder in your bookmarks for German science forums or did you just google that?

Honestly I'm not going to read all that I'll just say point taken and assume its legit.

But when you ask any proponent of evolution to name one of these transition species they'll be like "blah blah blah nothing of importance ok next topic"

[1338 h4x0r]

Do you have special folder in your bookmarks for German science forums or did you just google that?

It's Swedish not German

"NeuraltNätverk" is my account on the Vetenskap och Folkbildning forum

But when you ask any proponent of evolution to name one of these transition species they'll be like "blah blah blah nothing of importance ok next topic"

Uh, Osteolepis, Archaeopteryx? Homo erectus?

We've got transitional fossils coming out of our ***

[Against Miik!]

I'm just telling you what I've heard

[1338 h4x0r]

I think most evolution advocates would be able to name well known transitional species such as Archaeopteryx, at least a few of our hominid ancestors, and maybe mammal-like reptiles and such

The ineptitude of a few people doesn't invalidate a whole theory

[Pop music sucks]

And he showed you an in-depth flow chart of transitive species that had developed into their own distinctive species.

[1338 h4x0r]

It's like creationists are choosing not to see the dalmatian

http://www.christianhubert.com/writings/Gestalt1.jpeg

[Mr. Ron]

Where is it!?





p.s. this article is cool