PDA

View Full Version : 2010 is the end of the United States


DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 12:03 PM
I almost feel this is irresponsible on the part of the Wall Street Journal but I suppose everyone is entitled once in a while.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html

In short, this article details the collapse of the US and how it will happen and where the pieces will fall, and the dude who is doing the predicting is a Russian intellectual even though that's possibly an oxymoron of some sort.

MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.


Igor Panarin
In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.

But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."

Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."

In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

"When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

"It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.

Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.

Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.

Mr. Ron
12-29-2008, 12:10 PM
lol

spitfirejunky
12-29-2008, 12:15 PM
I'll be directly responsible for the secession of NYC. Just thought I'd get that out there.

Super Batman
12-29-2008, 01:12 PM
At least it's only a year away. I hate the waiting.

Foehammer
12-29-2008, 01:13 PM
I'm interested as to what your plan of action will be, batman
What of Gothom?

Super Batman
12-29-2008, 01:14 PM
I will defend my city. All who seek asylum can come, but only those pure of heart and those who follow justice will be welcome.
Gotham will stay safe.
No matter the cost.

fenwood
12-29-2008, 01:14 PM
I predicted this years ago as well, it won't be long before the amerikkkans are cannibalizing each other on the streets of new york. The 1000 yr war has begun.

CarnageFairy
12-29-2008, 01:20 PM
He doesn't mention what will happen to the southeast. And what about the middle of the country? Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, all that.


I guess no one really wants any of those states anyway.

THE_KING
12-29-2008, 01:23 PM
It may be the end for the united states
but it is not the end for my people!

Amit
12-29-2008, 01:44 PM
it's cool guys i'm stockpiling guns and highly trained but equally groovy black militants AS WE SPEAK

THE_KING
12-29-2008, 01:45 PM
I shall aid you by giving you more groovy yet highly trained black militants from my own family my people!

Mr. Ron
12-29-2008, 01:58 PM
this will be awesome I finally get to play S.T.A.L.K.E.R. irl

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 02:13 PM
I have a couple of NYC white supremacists in the pocket just in case. They have a bunker and mad guns.

I got a couple pipe hittin' ghetto thugs in the other pocket just in case.. They have a basement in the projects and mad izzies yo. I wish they would hold they guns right though.

I'm all set.

Amit
12-29-2008, 02:17 PM
white supremacists are lame tho

you need the black militants

THE_KING
12-29-2008, 02:17 PM
I shall give both non lame suorenacists and black militants!

Against Miik!
12-29-2008, 02:18 PM
Well ok this is a little far fetched but history shows that things will probably start to decline pretty rapidly at some point in the near future

if that makes sense

Super Batman
12-29-2008, 02:23 PM
Well ok this is a little far fetched but history shows that things will probably start to decline pretty rapidly at some point in the near future

if that makes sense

It doesn't.

kitsch
12-29-2008, 02:30 PM
Well ok this is a little far fetched but history shows that things will probably start to decline pretty rapidly at some point in the near future

if that makes sense

fearmongering - 1

Against Miik!
12-29-2008, 02:39 PM
Not really. I'm not suggesting the end of the world here. I'm just saying that all empires eventually spend go broke and decline. Things might be different now, that the entire world is on a fiat money supply. That remains to be seen. It happened all the way back to the Romans though, and as recently as the Soviet Union. I don't think being the "good guy" or "bad guy" has anything to do with it.

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 02:44 PM
white supremacists are lame tho

you need the black militants


Nah the black militants are all retards and they hold their guns sideways which never ever works.

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 02:45 PM
Not really. I'm not suggesting the end of the world here. I'm just saying that all empires eventually spend go broke and decline. Things might be different now, that the entire world is on a fiat money supply. That remains to be seen. It happened all the way back to the Romans though, and as recently as the Soviet Union. I don't think being the "good guy" or "bad guy" has anything to do with it.

Empire?

Seriously?

You can't even draw a small comparison to the US being an "empire" with any of the historical empires.

Slightly imperialistic? Maybe. All this report indicates is Russia wants Alaska back for some oil reserves so they won't need us anymore.

kitsch
12-29-2008, 02:47 PM
Not really. I'm not suggesting the end of the world here. I'm just saying that all empires eventually spend go broke and decline. Things might be different now, that the entire world is on a fiat money supply. That remains to be seen. It happened all the way back to the Romans though, and as recently as the Soviet Union. I don't think being the "good guy" or "bad guy" has anything to do with it.

well this whole thing is kind of irrelevant considering the US is not an empire

Against Miik!
12-29-2008, 02:51 PM
I don't think a country necessarily needs to control a lot of land to be considered an empire anymore. The US's sphere of influence extends to all parts of the globe. They probably have some sort of economic interest in almost every major country in the world, and certainly military interests in many of them. That should be enough to call them a modern day "empire".

Regardless of semantics though, the US is following a similar path. They cannot continue to act as though money grows on trees and expect to be ok.

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 03:03 PM
I don't think a country necessarily needs to control a lot of land to be considered an empire anymore. The US's sphere of influence extends to all parts of the globe. They probably have some sort of economic interest in almost every major country in the world, and certainly military interests in many of them. That should be enough to call them a modern day "empire".

Regardless of semantics though, the US is following a similar path. They cannot continue to act as though money grows on trees and expect to be ok.


Every country in the world qualifies as an empire then. We all seem to rely on each other quite a bit. Sphere of influence? Can you define that? I'm not trying to be difficult I just want to understand what you mean. Everyone trades with everyone so everyone relies on each other's economic "sphere of influence" if you want to get specific.

Like America doesn't produce a whole lot outside of the basics, but we sure buy quite a bit of crap from the rest of the world.

sLarkin20
12-29-2008, 03:04 PM
**** I'm moving to Russia.

Against Miik!
12-29-2008, 03:16 PM
Every country in the world qualifies as an empire then. We all seem to rely on each other quite a bit. Sphere of influence? Can you define that? I'm not trying to be difficult I just want to understand what you mean. Everyone trades with everyone so everyone relies on each other's economic "sphere of influence" if you want to get specific.

Like America doesn't produce a whole lot outside of the basics, but we sure buy quite a bit of crap from the rest of the world.

The US is a slighter larger player than most other countries though. For example, if a country like Portugal was completely wiped off the map, not bombed or anything, I mean just stopped existing, I don't think there would be many long term ramifications. Only a few countries in the world today need to exist to keep the global economy going. The US is the largest of these. China is another. You could make strong arguments for a handful of others. Couple that with the US military influence around the globe, as will as intents, and you have what is pretty close to an empire. Like I said, lets try to keep semantics out of it. Certainly its a different type of empire than ancient Rome, I'm not arguing they are the same thing.

I don't really know how to specifically define sphere of influence, other than to say if the US crumbled, the rest of the world would certainly follow, at least for the foreseeable future. Again, very few nations could say that. The fact that it is because we are aren't a creditor nation, but actually the extreme opposite, only adds fuel to the fire.

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 03:20 PM
Couple that with the US military influence around the globe, as will as intents, and you have what is pretty close to an empire.

:rolleyes:

C'mon I thought you actually knew something here. I am impressed you know the intentions of this country though. That's just outright amazing.

Actually it's nothing close. No empire was built on "intentions". Military influence around the globe? Do you mean South Korea? Or the Middle East?

I'm sorry but you're just plain wrong. I understand if we were imposing police state like conditions in Iraq, Afghanistan or South Korea, but that's hardly the case.

Against Miik!
12-29-2008, 03:24 PM
We don't have to impose a police state anywhere. I think it is a pretty safe assumption to say the Iraq invasion and subsequent takeover of the country was to have a base of operations in the middle east. The fact that it is in the name of democracy is only because we could not get away with it any other way.

wartomods
12-29-2008, 03:24 PM
there is a fallacy in all this, if usa would go down Canada would go with it, cause no hat floats in the air, lol

wartomods
12-29-2008, 03:25 PM
i wonder if this guy wrote Code Geass

wartomods
12-29-2008, 03:29 PM
He doesn't mention what will happen to the southeast. And what about the middle of the country? Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, all that.


I guess no one really wants any of those states anyway.

wyoming, why nobody cares about wyoming, even people at caring with non cared countries dont care about wyoming, wtf

wartomods
12-29-2008, 03:33 PM
The US is a slighter larger player than most other countries though. For example, if a country like Portugal was completely wiped off the map, not bombed or anything, I mean just stopped existing, I don't think there would be many long term ramifications. Only a few countries in the world today need to exist to keep the global economy going. The US is the largest of these. China is another. You could make strong arguments for a handful of others. Couple that with the US military influence around the globe, as will as intents, and you have what is pretty close to an empire. Like I said, lets try to keep semantics out of it. Certainly its a different type of empire than ancient Rome, I'm not arguing they are the same thing.

I don't really know how to specifically define sphere of influence, other than to say if the US crumbled, the rest of the world would certainly follow, at least for the foreseeable future. Again, very few nations could say that. The fact that it is because we are aren't a creditor nation, but actually the extreme opposite, only adds fuel to the fire.

damn bro, why Portugal

AtomicWaste
12-29-2008, 03:38 PM
Naturally, the US will break out in a race war (because electing a black president wouldn't have caused that by now?), then subdivide into territories which will be governed either by weak military/diplomatic nations (Canada, Mexico) or by well overseas powers (China, Russia).

USSR's dead, brah. Time to move on.

DBoons Ghost
12-29-2008, 03:40 PM
They want Alaska! I would too if I knew Sarah Palin was in charge.

wartomods
12-29-2008, 03:47 PM
They want Alaska! I would too if I knew Sarah Palin was in charge.

it would be pumping all day long for that oil

IbanezArtist
12-29-2008, 04:03 PM
TBH I wanna live in the Mexican republic.

wartomods
12-29-2008, 04:11 PM
He doesn't mention what will happen to the southeast. And what about the middle of the country? Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, all that.


I guess no one really wants any of those states anyway.

mid countries will be influenced by Portugal

IbanezArtist
12-29-2008, 04:11 PM
Nah, Trinidad and Tobago will conquer all of America with their mad goalkeeper - Hislop!

wartomods
12-29-2008, 04:13 PM
except mid countries that nobody cares about

McP3000
12-29-2008, 04:55 PM
This russian dude is so ****ing stupid

the end of the world comes in 2012 not 2010

Aaron
12-29-2008, 05:03 PM
Let's get this guy and Noam Chomsky together and see what type of babies they make. Some of his points do make sense, but I'm not sure about the likelihood of this happening though, as he implies, especially not such a focused timeline.

it's cool guys i'm stockpiling guns and highly trained but equally groovy black militants AS WE SPEAK
Are you the new Shaft, Amit?

Amit
12-29-2008, 05:04 PM
yeah call me shivaft

JohnXDoe
12-29-2008, 05:21 PM
this is what happens when you think too much. you get plain silly

he'd be the perfect PNWI poster

Iskandar
12-29-2008, 05:54 PM
yeah call me shivaftKrishnaft

I tried.:(

Amit
12-29-2008, 06:04 PM
yeah it doesn't work v well

Iskandar
12-29-2008, 07:23 PM
Well I'm a Jew not a Hindu!

Amit
12-29-2008, 08:19 PM
sjewhaft

Meatplow
12-29-2008, 08:37 PM
good, this arrogant cesspool of a country needs to be taken down a peg or seven

i'm waiting for china to attack

Der Übermensch
12-29-2008, 09:10 PM
I predicted this years ago as well, it won't be long before the amerikkkans are cannibalizing each other on the streets of new york. The 1000 yr war has begun.

fenwood! O how I have missed ye!

PunkItUp
12-30-2008, 12:05 AM
yes how we longed for your return

beastman168
12-30-2008, 03:30 AM
Russia can have me, but they'll never take my guns!

Pop music sucks
12-30-2008, 06:36 AM
with Alaska reverting to Russian control:upset:

*puts on Ruskie hat*

yogerto
12-30-2008, 08:46 AM
cool i always hoped the world would go through an apocalypse an id be the last left alive with a couple hot chicks so i could grow weed and make my womens get me food

jaredong
12-30-2008, 09:17 AM
i would say that American power is declining. Not in terms of an "empire" but just in terms of a nation i think. I dont really have any hardcore stats, but just relative to the power of all other countries. I dont think it is today holding the dominance it did in the pass 50 odd years during the cold war, especially with the rise of China and India and all that.

I think that dominating countries rise and fall, its not a new thing. Holland, Spain, Britain use to be pretty dominant too in the past. Extended wars and depleting economies dont help either.

That said, I seriously doubt that America would disintegrate. A country can decline from world dominance without shattering. I think it takes a least a chunk of decades and even then America's still going to be a strong world power (though not *the* world power).

My best guess is that this Russian professor is just using this as a self fulfilling prophecy or as psychological warfare. Based on the article:

A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats...

Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s...

Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB...

His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency...

and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency...

In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010....

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says...

In short, the professor is is former KGB, strongly nationalistic, and worked with and based theories on information given by the FAPSI (apparently a Russian national security agency). He gave the theory at a conference about "information warfare".

Hence, it is likely that this forecast is overblown and used to precisely as "information warfare". Like the Soviet propaganda of the pass claiming some magical world wide revolution, i wouldnt worry about this.