EaterOfUterus
09-27-2008, 05:41 PM
Laci Peterson was a young mother-to-be who in 2002 was taken by Scott (her husband) and murdered. Now many of you are familiar with this story so I will spare you the details but there is an awfully sticky legal issue underlying the crime.
The specifics of the charges were that Scott was charged with first degree murder of his wife Laci and with second degree murder for the death of the unborn child, which he may have inadvertently caused.
Now many of you fine blue state liberals applaud the activist judges for sentencing this madman to death. I being the conservative that I am protest and object.
On what grounds?
Wh is to say that he is guilty of the death of any child? Abortion is legal in this country and a mother can willingly execute her own child and be removed of any guilt or risk any charges brought against her.
Then why can't the man make the same decision? I believe the unborn child was nothing but a mass of cells and because he may have perhaps inadvertently killed Laci, he is charged with the death of a child? (excuse me, fetus?)
This is outrageous! This is preposterous!
These liberal judges have acknowledged the beginning of life by even suggesting that he may have ended one before it began! This is madness!
If I was Scott's attorney I would have appealed this all the way to the Supreme Court. It is madness when a woman can kill her child but if I dropkick some bitch in the stomach and her fetus "ceases to grow" (not live you dolts it's a ****ing fetus) then I get charged with murder? This is inexcusable of the judicial to decide this. I should be able to dropkick any slut I want to and not have to fear being charged with a crime.
Aren't you liberals the ones complaining that the earth is overpopulated? Yet I get charged with murder for dropkicking a slut?
You are all madmen. The years of abusing your bodies have fried your brains and I have effectively dismantled any futile argument you may have.
I have demonstrated the idiocy in the liberals position and I think I have done a very good job of it.
The specifics of the charges were that Scott was charged with first degree murder of his wife Laci and with second degree murder for the death of the unborn child, which he may have inadvertently caused.
Now many of you fine blue state liberals applaud the activist judges for sentencing this madman to death. I being the conservative that I am protest and object.
On what grounds?
Wh is to say that he is guilty of the death of any child? Abortion is legal in this country and a mother can willingly execute her own child and be removed of any guilt or risk any charges brought against her.
Then why can't the man make the same decision? I believe the unborn child was nothing but a mass of cells and because he may have perhaps inadvertently killed Laci, he is charged with the death of a child? (excuse me, fetus?)
This is outrageous! This is preposterous!
These liberal judges have acknowledged the beginning of life by even suggesting that he may have ended one before it began! This is madness!
If I was Scott's attorney I would have appealed this all the way to the Supreme Court. It is madness when a woman can kill her child but if I dropkick some bitch in the stomach and her fetus "ceases to grow" (not live you dolts it's a ****ing fetus) then I get charged with murder? This is inexcusable of the judicial to decide this. I should be able to dropkick any slut I want to and not have to fear being charged with a crime.
Aren't you liberals the ones complaining that the earth is overpopulated? Yet I get charged with murder for dropkicking a slut?
You are all madmen. The years of abusing your bodies have fried your brains and I have effectively dismantled any futile argument you may have.
I have demonstrated the idiocy in the liberals position and I think I have done a very good job of it.