Review layout

[Platonism]

I've been eager to write a few reviews recently and have had a lot of ideas on how to lay them out. However, it's still really difficult because there are so many different types of reviews that I can't really pin-point a layout. So if someone could just point me in a general direction that'd be cool.

Thanks.

[Mister_Che]

There isn't really a standard layout. Go with the one that appeals most to your writing style.

And check out the comments on some reviews. Some will have comments on the layout which should give you some direction.

[malaise]

I think everything but track by tracks are generally accepted.

[Jonny]

I enjoy reading track by tracks.

[Electric City]

Don't do a track by track. The best criticism you can get from a tbt is "nice tbt, but dont do a tbt." There really has to be no official "layout" to your review, it should just be a well written presentation of your thoughts. Mention what you like and dislike and have it relate back to an overall "thesis" about the album. Maybe

[notwillfellmarsy]

don't do...
Vocalist is like...
Guitarist is like
drummer...
in separate paragraphs, analyze each if you want just do it in a non-obvious way...use a lot of food metaphors

[stabu]

Track by Track lets me know which songs to download

[Cesar21]

well written presentation of your thoughts.

To that I add that it must be coherent and organized. Just remember that in a review what u are trying to do is give the reader a general idea of what the album is/sounds like, and your opinion and thoughts on it, and why u think that way.

Don't do a tbt, but i strongly suggest adding a "Recommended Tracks" at the end of your review. That should answer the people asking "what songs should I download?"

[Electric City]

Track by Track lets me know which songs to download

good reviews make me know which albums to download!

[Platonism]

Awesome thanks a lot! It helped enough for me to formulate something.

[eliminatorz]

do a track by track tbh

[McP3000]

Track by Tracks are acceptable if really well done, AND there is only a few tracks. Like if its a 4 song EP, or a Godspeed album then its fine.
Otherwise, just do the album as a whole, plus a few standout tracks and the weaker ones.

[DFelon204409]

Don't do a track by track. You're just asking to get denied in that case.

[Thor]

make your first paragraph really pretentious and describe the wilderness and ****

[taylormemer]

don't do...
Vocalist is like...
Guitarist is like
drummer...
in separate paragraphs, analyze each if you want just do it in a non-obvious way...use a lot of food metaphors

Yeah, we have one user that does that and he's just really annoying.

Also, don't freak out about how long it is. To many end up doing this, and get it into their head that adding an extra three paragraphs to "beef up" the review is a good thing, when in fact just adds more redundancy to the review.

[notwillfellmarsy]

Idk who does that, i always find myself shortening my reviews , i always think they are too long

[McP3000]

make your first paragraph really pretentious and describe the wilderness and ****
Haha, copy and paste Shadow's intro paragraph to Carriers of Dust

[bastard]

and whatever you do, don't write like me.

[morrissey]

From the FAQ:

1. Reviews can be seen as somewhat similar to writing an essay for school - you can't just turn in an essay without an introduction, thesis statement, body paragraphs, and conclusion, for instance. Having these elements in your review is crucial because it gives your review a focus. A review without an introduction/conclusion and only body paragraphs will look less pleasant to read than a review that is more soundly structured.

Additionally, you have free reign over how much (or how little) you wish to write. However, please note that the reality of the Internet is that few people will read an extremely long review. You should strive for writing in a clear, concise fashion. This is completely subjective from one person to the next, so how you interpret your ratings and reviews is completely up to you. Keep in mind that if you don't feel comfortable with a full-length review, you can elect to write a sound-off, which is a shorter, more informal opinion on the album.

2. Write in the style that you are most comfortable with. Do not pay attention to people who tell you that you should write reviews a certain way, because odds are they aren't the greatest writers themselves. People tend to prefer reading and writing overall reviews compared to track-by-track reviews, but do what you feel is your strength. Most writers tend to start out with track-by-track reviews, and then develop into overall-review writers.

3. While reviewing, make sure that instead of just describing what you hear, qualify that information and explain how it reveals or represents a cool feature of what you're reviewing. Nobody wants to read, for instance, "Okay, there's a breakdown here, and another one at the end of the song, and at 4:14, there's a guitar solo where he switches from pentatonic scales to chromatic scales while changing from a key of E to C#." It's more important to know WHY you think it's good or not rather than it just physically existing. In short, avoid giving play-by-plays.

The most important aspect of your review is your analysis of the album. This is YOUR review, so give YOUR take on it. However, you should support your claim with numerous examples. Say WHY you like/dislike [something], and provide examples as to WHY your like/dislike exists.

4. Don't be gimmicky in your reviews. Highlighting songs within the review is fine (bolding, italicizing, etc.), but do not be overly distracting with having a whole bunch of colors. The reader is interested in the actual review, not how flashy it looks. By all means, give life to your review, but don't do it via inside jokes. A review is bolstered with the use of transitions, for instance, and not what your best friend on the Internet said two weeks ago.

5. Run a spell-checker and a grammar-check before you submit to Sputnikmusic (Mozilla Firefox, MSWord, etc. all have spelling checkers, for example). If you do not have access to one, then e-mail your review to a friend or two and have him/her look it over. Remember that most spell-checkers and grammar checkers do not account for human error, so being your own critic will be beneficial. Some reviewers recommend that you don't post a review as soon as you finish. This is the same as with any other thing you've written; let it sit for a few hours, overnight, whatever. Re-reading it when it's not fresh in your mind will help you make sure it's actually well-written. Lastly, if you're reviewing something that already has a review, try to make sure you're doing more than re-iterating the same facts over and over; you should add a unique twist to it to make your review stand out from the other review(s).

6. If you get stuck or need help or another pair of eyes to read over a review before you submit it, by all means, do not be ashamed to ask for help. This is a community site, after all, and there are plenty of users on the site who will take the time to give you their feedback. If you are a peer editor, please give constructive criticism. If you are seeking a peer editor, don't take offense to their comments - they only are trying to make you a better writer. Simply ask in the community forum if you need help!

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showpost.php?p=15139925&postcount=7

[marksellsuswallets]

Haha, copy and paste Shadow's intro paragraph to Carriers of Dust

No...don't do that...I did it and it got erased haha...