LP, EP, Live

[Statutory Ape]

Instead of fully listing all albums; live, ep, lp. There should be two different sections:

LP
and
Live/EP/Rare-Realease/Independent Realease.


It just seems too cluttered. For some artists they will have like 5 EP's with one vote each clogging up the whole section.

Also there should be an overall rating which is all the artists albums combined.

So basically and "Artist Rating"


Anyone?

[JumpTheF**kUp]

An artist rating would suck because bands go through phases of goodness.

eg. Weezer's first 2 albums would give the band an average of like 4.2 but if you add in the rest it goes down to about a 3 which would discourage people from checking them out. Same goes for bands like Cryptopsy.

[McP3000]

I agree with the sorting of releases by LP/EP/Live/Etc

but putting it as LP vs Everything else is also a bad idea

It should be LP/EP's and then everything else, or just list everything separately.

[DFelon204409]

I mean, in reality, we should just have a drop down menu for lp/ep/dvd/live/demo/unreleased when writing a review. Therefore band page can be organized to show continuity in both chronology and format. Also, you could look at charts that break those features down.

[taylormemer]

^^
Best suggestion so far. It would both add too the site, and offer a better browsing experience.

[taylormemer]

Double posts, bah!

[guitrguy]

I agree with the dividing the releases in LP, EP, Live, etc. But the Artist Rating is not a great idea.

[Jim]

the artist rating is a horrible idea.