View Full Version : postmodernism and religions
Babble
09-21-2007, 06:45 AM
The point here is that there is the postmodernist trend that we should respect all (or many) viewpoints on a particular subject could actually be harming people. For instance, faith-based medicine could lead to medical neglect.
However, that's only from my point of view (and I suppose statistics).
What is yours
For the record: spirituality does not refer to inner peace. It refers to supernatural experience (as in closeness with God).
big80smullet
09-21-2007, 07:10 AM
I think that as long as a person's beliefs only hurt them they should be free to do what they want. Its when these dodgy "religions" start brainwashing people and applying their practises to vulnerable people (like the scientologists do with their random massages at disaster reliefs) that i start to have problems with it.
Det_Nosnip
09-21-2007, 07:14 AM
Post-Post-Modernist poll response: vote for all 4.
Babble
09-21-2007, 12:35 PM
that's a rather interesting position
italic zero
09-21-2007, 12:45 PM
contradiction is the highest form of truth
Reaganista
09-21-2007, 01:10 PM
i disagree with all of them
Babble
09-21-2007, 01:12 PM
what would you have included?
Iscariot
09-21-2007, 01:17 PM
imo reason and spirituality are both important
you can be the walking shining example of reason but it does you no good what so ever if you're neglecting your own emotional/spiritual needs simply to support that reason
in reverse throwing reason to the wind and believing solely that your religious beliefs are the foundation and fuel of your world can be intellectually damaging in a continuously evolving society
reason itself is subjective though if not on all levels than at least a few as what makes perfect sense to one person might confuse and frustrate another not necessarily because one belief is right while the other is wrong but because of differing perspectives on a given situation
all that being said i'm trying to find a happy balance between reason and belief and every day i feel more and more at peace as a result
this post probably doesn't make sense but it sounded good in my head
Reaganista
09-21-2007, 01:18 PM
what would you have included?
scientific truth historical truth personal truth
it is a guiding principle!
Det_Nosnip
09-21-2007, 05:34 PM
contradiction is the highest form of truth
Quite so!
Or, there is no truth.
Babble
09-21-2007, 05:40 PM
well that isn't postpostmodernism
that IS postmodernism
Oriah
09-21-2007, 06:59 PM
Why arn't violent religions included?
Babble
09-21-2007, 07:01 PM
because I knew if I had said "all religions should be respected" someone wouldve asked "what about religions that specify that we kill people daily" or some **** and I didn't feel like making 5 options.
Feel free to make a case for the acceptance of violent religions.
Mr. Ron
09-21-2007, 07:11 PM
scientific truth historical truth personal truth
it is a guiding principle!
^^^^ yeah I want that option.
pedro durruti
09-22-2007, 04:02 AM
scientific truth historical truth personal truth
it is a guiding principle!
Why do you think all of those are unreasonable?
Luc214
09-22-2007, 09:09 AM
imo reason and spirituality are both important
you can be the walking shining example of reason but it does you no good what so ever if you're neglecting your own emotional/spiritual needs simply to support that reason
in reverse throwing reason to the wind and believing solely that your religious beliefs are the foundation and fuel of your world can be intellectually damaging in a continuously evolving society
reason itself is subjective though if not on all levels than at least a few as what makes perfect sense to one person might confuse and frustrate another not necessarily because one belief is right while the other is wrong but because of differing perspectives on a given situation
all that being said i'm trying to find a happy balance between reason and belief and every day i feel more and more at peace as a result
this post probably doesn't make sense but it sounded good in my head
This is actually a rather good post. Props.
Reaganista
09-23-2007, 05:14 PM
Why do you think all of those are unreasonable?
when did i say that? i said they're a guiding principal
you dont deserve to wear that uniform
Babble
09-23-2007, 05:48 PM
i think his point was that those would fit under the first option
which was really my first thought when you posted it too
Reaganista
09-23-2007, 05:56 PM
i dont think any of them necessarily have to be reasonable
Babble
09-23-2007, 06:11 PM
scientific truth does.
Reaganista
09-23-2007, 06:20 PM
not really
Babble
09-23-2007, 06:23 PM
im not having this argument with you because there is no way you can possible support this claim.
italic zero
09-23-2007, 06:39 PM
science inherently favors empiricism over rationalism
The Chemist
09-27-2007, 11:08 PM
science inherently favors empiricism over rationalism
Only in isolated instances. More often than not, science dictates rationalism as foundation.
Reaganista
09-28-2007, 12:56 AM
im not having this argument with you because there is no way you can possible support this claim.
of course i can
there's no inherent connection between reason and truth
pedro durruti
09-28-2007, 02:57 AM
How do you get to them? By unreasoning?
Reaganista
09-28-2007, 06:43 AM
you can get to truth by just about any means
Babble
09-28-2007, 01:00 PM
for the record I'm blocking you bc you're pointless.
Reaganista
09-28-2007, 02:12 PM
im going to flip a coin if it's heads then 2+2=4 if it's tails then pigs are controlled by miniature cephalopod-like aliens that live in their feet
pedro durruti
09-29-2007, 05:35 PM
you can get to truth by just about any means
Ok, how?
Reaganista
09-30-2007, 04:31 PM
im going to flip a coin if it's heads then 2+2=4 if it's tails then pigs are controlled by miniature cephalopod-like aliens that live in their feet
fathergoat
09-30-2007, 04:58 PM
Reason over religion, but some religious views still are nice.
pedro durruti
09-30-2007, 05:27 PM
im going to flip a coin if it's heads then 2+2=4 if it's tails then pigs are controlled by miniature cephalopod-like aliens that live in their feet
What?
PerpetualBurn
09-30-2007, 05:55 PM
Hint: If it lands on heads then he's arrived at truth
italic zero
09-30-2007, 06:05 PM
Only in isolated instances. More often than not, science dictates rationalism as foundation.
Science has never fully embraced rationalism in any instance. String theory may be the closest, but even that is only a rationalist expansion on empiric data.
pedro durruti
09-30-2007, 06:10 PM
Hint: If it lands on heads then he's arrived at truth
Hint: If it lands on tails then he's arrived at truth
Lupus
09-30-2007, 06:30 PM
Hint: If it lands on tails then he's arrived at truth
How could you miss such a simple point?
pedro durruti
09-30-2007, 06:32 PM
What?
Reaganista
09-30-2007, 08:38 PM
What?
you can get to truth by just about any means
spitfirejunky
09-30-2007, 11:55 PM
"Source of truth" is a very shaky term. Truth is an inherent aspect of the universe.
pedro durruti
10-01-2007, 12:45 AM
you can get to truth by just about any means
Yeah I know, but can you give an example of a personal, historic or scientific truth that does not use reason?
PerpetualBurn
10-01-2007, 06:09 AM
Yeah I know, but can you give an example of a personal, historic or scientific truth that does not use reason?
im going to flip a coin if it's heads then 2+2=4 if it's tails then pigs are controlled by miniature cephalopod-like aliens that live in their feet
How are you not getting this?
The Chemist
10-01-2007, 08:17 AM
He's getting it by saying that flipping a coin for the truth heralds the same sucess rate as research.
PerpetualBurn
10-01-2007, 09:00 AM
I don't think he said that. And no one's talking about success rate anyway.
Reaganista
10-01-2007, 09:31 AM
Yeah I know, but can you give an example of a personal, historic or scientific truth that does not use reason?
i dont think you understand
He's getting it by saying that flipping a coin for the truth heralds the same sucess rate as research.
what
The Chemist
10-01-2007, 09:37 AM
I don't think he said that. And no one's talking about success rate anyway.
I wasn't really paying attention.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.