PDA

View Full Version : Bill O'Reilly hates Nas now


Dave de Sylvia
08-21-2007, 11:15 PM
Those rappers with their "bling bling"!

Over the past week, Fox News pundit Bill O'Reilly has launched a campaign against the inclusion of rapper Nas in a concert celebrating the re-opening of Virginia Tech university on the grounds that his criminal record and music which supposedly glorifies violence. The concert will be headed by Dave Matthews Band, and the line-up was chosen by Dave Matthews.

Check out the highlight reel, also featuring syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin, who previously teamed up with Bill to condemn the "rapper" "Akorn" for grinding on stage with a 15-year-old girl, and animal rights organisation PETA for pushing to have alleged dog-fighting organiser Michael Vick dropped from lucrative marketing deals.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=EwDV1z6hqLs

http://nahright.com/news/2007/08/21/video-bill-oreilly-vs-nas-continued

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=pOhZ0GP1tuw

Then check out Jay Smooth's (of XXL) hilarious rebuttal:

http://nahright.com/news/2007/08/20/video-bill-oreilly-is-mad-doggie/

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/news.php?newsid=4173

Mr. Ron
08-21-2007, 11:17 PM
AND RIGHTFULLY SO


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pGJCkCDK5A

Reaganista
08-21-2007, 11:18 PM
i agree with them on critcizing peta

gregulus
08-21-2007, 11:26 PM
haha rebuttle is hilarious

"naaaaz nasty naaaaas"

DiesIrae
08-21-2007, 11:36 PM
Shoot em' up is like 9 years old! His new stuff is WAY different. Anyways, they forget to mention all his anti violence songs too. God forbid Bill O'Reilly actually researches his bullshiit stories before they air.

Mr. Ron
08-21-2007, 11:46 PM
http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com/

DiesIrae
08-21-2007, 11:53 PM
http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com/

I don't hate him that much. If I where to make a hate site for a news person it would either be Sean Hannity or Anne Coulter. Now those two need a slap in the face with a big ****.

Mr. Ron
08-22-2007, 12:13 AM
I don't hate him that much. If I where to make a hate site for a news person it would either be Sean Hannity or Anne Coulter. Now those two need a slap in the face with a big ****.

Im not sure who is worse though, probably Coulter.

DiesIrae
08-22-2007, 12:16 AM
Im not sure who is worse though, probably Coulter.

I think you're right, Coulter makes me want to smack a bitch hard with a backhand of justice.

Krabsworth
08-22-2007, 12:19 AM
**** bill o reilly that is all that can be said about him ever

dave matthews did gravedigger thats horrible

RIP Ian Curtis
08-22-2007, 02:08 AM
Gotta agree with him against the P.E.T.A. Not that i agree with dog-fighting, just that those bastards need to be thwarted at every turn. As for getting Nas to do it, like anyone in any genre, signed to any label anywhere has the balls to do anything other than a limp-wristed cliched "never forget" gig.

Reaganista
08-22-2007, 02:11 AM
i agree with dog-fighting

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 02:35 AM
no you don't, you just want to troll

Amit
08-22-2007, 02:52 AM
wtf is wrong with dog fighting

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 03:00 AM
probably the dog fighting part

Amit
08-22-2007, 03:01 AM
what's wrong about dogs fighting

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 03:04 AM
what isn't wrong with it?

Amit
08-22-2007, 03:05 AM
nothing

unless you have a problem with horse racing and cheese burgers

DanD
08-22-2007, 03:05 AM
what's not wrong with dogs fighting

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 03:09 AM
nothing

unless you have a problem with horse racing and cheese burgers

except in horse racing, it isn't a race to see who lives and dies. it's a business. and cheese burgers are consumed because people want to eat them. there's nothing positive to gain from dog fighting. it only leads to the unneccesary conclusion of dogs dying.

Amit
08-22-2007, 03:13 AM
umm how is wanting to eat a burger different from wanting to see dogs fight

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 03:18 AM
because people need to eat to survive. burgers give an option of what to eat. humans don't need to see dogs fight to survive.

how are they similar at all? seriously, did you even think it through before deciding to claim that they are the same?

Smokey D
08-22-2007, 04:16 AM
umm how is wanting to eat a burger different from wanting to see dogs fight

Sorry, that's retarded.

Dogfighting is inherently cruel, because it involves pain and long periods of stress on the part of the animals. Killing a cow painlessly does not.

Knifeboy
08-22-2007, 04:33 AM
I say we ban burgers but keep dogfighting

Eliminator
08-22-2007, 05:08 AM
Burgerfighting.

Akira
08-22-2007, 05:40 AM
What really pissed me off about the segment was when the guy pointed out that Shoot 'em Up is not an accurate representation of Nas' music, Papa Bear said he could name fifteen more songs. We all no that he probably didn't listen even listen to all of Soot 'em Up, he sure as hell didn't listen to fifteen other songs.

His "journalism" makes me feel sick.

Eliminator
08-22-2007, 06:11 AM
BUT HE HAS A GUN CONVINCTION!

DiesIrae
08-22-2007, 08:51 AM
BUT HE HAS A GUN CONVINCTION!

So does O'Reilly

ringworm
08-22-2007, 09:06 AM
wait do some in here NOT want M Vick to be banned from the NFL or other severe punishment?



who cares about Nas & VT & O'Reilly

Reaganista
08-22-2007, 09:16 AM
michael vick would be starting next week if i had anything to do with it
no you don't
yes i do

Dogfighting is inherently cruel, because it involves pain and long periods of stress on the part of the animals. Killing a cow painlessly does not.
except sometimes one or both dogs get to live
no cow ever lives through being eaten
pain and stress is not worse than death

planewreck
08-22-2007, 09:20 AM
pain and stress is not worse than death
Are you figuring in that the pain and stress eventually subsides? That's not always the case, and if the pain and stress is continuous, as in they are constantly made out to fight, then why wouldn't death be better for them? I know that saving them would be a better option, but that can't always be the case.

gregulus
08-22-2007, 09:24 AM
pain and stress is not worse than death

but pain, stress, and then death is, and this often happened to the loser of the dogfights. hanging, electrocution, beating, etc.

Reaganista
08-22-2007, 09:33 AM
no it doesn't matter if it's killed later for whatever reason being in a fight is not worse being eaten
if this were true then no animal would ever fight back whenever anything tried to eat it

Are you figuring in that the pain and stress eventually subsides? That's not always the case, and if the pain and stress is continuous, as in they are constantly made out to fight, then why wouldn't death be better for them?
because pain and stress is better than death
wtf kind of question is that
if animals thought a life of pain was better than death they would never try to do things to extend their lives when they were in pain

ringworm
08-22-2007, 09:36 AM
michael vick would be starting next week if i had anything to do with it

starting a large prison term i hope you meant

Reaganista
08-22-2007, 09:38 AM
starting for the falcons
and starting up a new dog-fighting ring

lunchforthesky
08-22-2007, 09:52 AM
He can rot in prison.

I'm thinking 10 years and a massive fine. In the millions. All donated the animal shelters (not Peta) and obviously a lifetime banning from all American Football leagues.

ringworm
08-22-2007, 09:56 AM
agreed, i hope the only pigskin he touches again, is, well, a guy named "Pig"s foreskin in cell block D

Nostalgia
08-22-2007, 10:07 AM
umm how is wanting to eat a burger different from wanting to see dogs fight

:lol:!

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 10:43 AM
except sometimes one or both dogs get to live
no cow ever lives through being eaten
pain and stress is not worse than death

except most of the time they do die, and when they don't die, they are so badly hurt that they have to be put down. cow's are put down without pain (or atleast should be). that's why dogfighting is animal cruelty, you moron.

PerpetualBurn
08-22-2007, 10:49 AM
no it doesn't matter if it's killed later for whatever reason being in a fight is not worse being eaten
if this were true then no animal would ever fight back whenever anything tried to eat it

No I'm fairly sure the only part that matters is the bit the animal experiences.

RIP Ian Curtis
08-22-2007, 12:08 PM
I can't but disagree with dogfighting, as much as the redneck in me wants to agree. It's cruel, unneccesary and just base and wrong. I hate to deal in absolutes but this is basically undebatable.

Tha End
08-22-2007, 12:57 PM
haha bill o'reilly is a tool

Misanthropic
08-22-2007, 01:15 PM
never having heard of o'reilly before, i just youtubed him, and i must say, he's a stupid piece of ****.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 01:24 PM
no he's really intelligent actually

>_>

<_<

Avalanche.
08-22-2007, 01:25 PM
no he's really intelligent actually

>_>

<_<

You gotta be crazy :rolleyes:

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 01:36 PM
obv

Misanthropic
08-22-2007, 01:39 PM
no offense, but seeing guys like this, and those manic t.v. preachers for example, being televised on what i guess is public channels makes me really happy i don't live in the u.s. being careful not to say "stupid americans" etc, i still think the mentality this kind of media delivers (to the easily-manipulated, not all americans of course) makes for the pretty common european view that "americans are dumb". i think this view culminated around 2000 or something, and has since then faded a bit, from being trendy to the point where it's more like "if you say all americans are stupid, you're ignorant".

sorry if i'm not making sense, english isn't my main lanuage.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 01:41 PM
no you're making sense. we just have some dumb people in our country.

Amit
08-22-2007, 01:56 PM
because people need to eat to survive. burgers give an option of what to eat. humans don't need to see dogs fight to survive.

how are they similar at all? seriously, did you even think it through before deciding to claim that they are the same?

um except the people who eat burgers aren't eating them for survival at all

Sorry, that's retarded.

Dogfighting is inherently cruel, because it involves pain and long periods of stress on the part of the animals. Killing a cow painlessly does not.

plenty of countries have long histories and traditions of cockfighting and fighting with other animals so i don't see the problem with dogfighting

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 01:58 PM
um except the people who eat burgers aren't eating them for survival at all


um except yes they are

Amit
08-22-2007, 02:04 PM
no they aren't

burgers are inherently a luxury

Bron-Yr-Aur
08-22-2007, 02:05 PM
people inside a mcdonald's typically arent there to stave off starvation

Amit
08-22-2007, 02:10 PM
lol yeah seriously

Independent_CA
08-22-2007, 02:11 PM
Bill O'Reilly should be sent to Gitmo. So should all of his friends and associates.

WhoDidTheElf
08-22-2007, 03:12 PM
Oh well it's just one idiot hating another idiot.

Amit
08-22-2007, 03:14 PM
how is nas an idiot

WhoDidTheElf
08-22-2007, 03:16 PM
Remeber his comments on TV after katrina?

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 03:17 PM
I think you mean Kayne West, the other black guy on TV.

WhoDidTheElf
08-22-2007, 03:18 PM
<<
>>

My bad.

/embarressed much

Edit: wait that was kayne? I swore it was nas... And did he do the whole bible thing as well?

Edit2: damnit, it was him too.

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 03:18 PM
lmao

PerpetualBurn
08-22-2007, 03:18 PM
Nas is ****ing awesome and O'Reilly knows it.

A Dead Modernist
08-22-2007, 03:42 PM
Nas should speak up tbh

Knifeboy
08-22-2007, 03:55 PM
itt: all black people look the same

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 04:06 PM
man doesn't o'reilly remember nas' song "jesus walks"

he's a good guy!


also they use a clip of jay z getting shot in one of his videos to point out how nas is a violent rapper. that's hardly fair tbh

Akira
08-22-2007, 04:09 PM
You expect journalistic integrity from the Factor?

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:13 PM
people inside a mcdonald's typically arent there to stave off starvation

actually, a lot of impoverished people live off of fast food places like mcdonald's because the food is very cheap.

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 04:16 PM
It's not that cheap.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:17 PM
they also aren't able to eat that often

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 04:26 PM
What?

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 04:30 PM
It's not that cheap.

um i can get a pretty solid meal at mcdonalds for five bucks maybe even less if i have less money to spend. it's cheaper and more convenient to eat unhealthy in america than it is to eat healthy.

Knifeboy
08-22-2007, 04:32 PM
It's not that cheap.

Actually, the cheapest food I've ever seen, was at an American McDonald's.. At one buck a pop, living off of double cheeseburgers would be cheaper than anything else

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:35 PM
What?

people will still eat mcdonald's, they just won't eat it as often. there really isnt much cheaper food you can find than mcdonald's.

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 04:35 PM
which is why so many people below the poverty line in america are fat, it goes against the theory that if you have more money to spend, you eat fattier luxury food because everyone who has money can afford gym memberships and healthy upscale restaurants.

lunchforthesky
08-22-2007, 04:36 PM
people will still eat mcdonald's, they just won't eat it as often. there really isnt much cheaper food you can find than mcdonald's.

erm yeah there is.

Make food yourself, it's way cheaper.

Bron-Yr-Aur
08-22-2007, 04:36 PM
i can see the low prices appealing to the impoverished, but if anything that sounds like a minority demographic.

the point was that... oh whatever it wasnt a good comparison to begin with.

dogfighting is inherently more malicious in nature and motive and than buying/producing food.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:39 PM
erm yeah there is.

Make food yourself, it's way cheaper.

some people are so poor that they don't even have homes, let alone a kitchen that they can cook in.

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 04:39 PM
nobody that poor is eating at mcdonalds, they're getting drunk everyday

erm yeah there is.

Make food yourself, it's way cheaper.

yeah but it's not as convenient

these are americans we're talking about

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:41 PM
i can see the low prices appealing to the impoverished, but if anything that sounds like a minority demographic.

the point was that... oh whatever it wasnt a good comparison to begin with.

dogfighting is inherently more malicious in nature and motive and than buying/producing food.

the point was that a lot of people do eat burgers for survival, tbqh.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:42 PM
nobody that poor is eating at mcdonalds, they're getting drunk everyday


:rolleyes:

Bron-Yr-Aur
08-22-2007, 04:44 PM
a point i never refuted

typically though, people dont go to mcdonalds to survive

or eat burgers more than any other food to do so

tbqh

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:46 PM
i'll agree if you show me a statistic saying so, not sure anyone keeps a stat like that though.

CatfishJones
08-22-2007, 04:48 PM
**** bill o' reilly. anything said that doesnt go hand in hand with his beliefs, he considers to be wrong.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:49 PM
bill o'reilly wants to **** you

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 04:50 PM
um i can get a pretty solid meal at mcdonalds for five bucks maybe even less if i have less money to spend. it's cheaper and more convenient to eat unhealthy in america than it is to eat healthy.
You must not live near a grocery store then.

CatfishJones
08-22-2007, 04:51 PM
bill o'reilly wants to **** you

im not surprised.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:51 PM
You must not live near a grocery store then.

haha

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 04:52 PM
:rolleyes:

well don't pretend people without kitchens can't afford bread and peanut butter

mcdonalds is just convenient

You must not live near a grocery store then.

yeah because people would rather live on cheap grocery store food that they have to prepare then just go out and have someone else make food for them for hardly anything.

do you know how much meat costs at grocery stores? i'll give you a hint, it's not cheaper than a double cheeseburger.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 04:59 PM
well don't pretend people without kitchens can't afford bread and peanut butter

mcdonalds is just convenient

even the poor in america have high standards tbh. they wont accept a life of eating peanut butter sandwiches everyday. i think we're on the same page though.

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 05:01 PM
i think we're on the same page though.

these are americans we're talking about

tru

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:03 PM
yeah because people would rather live on cheap grocery store food that they have to prepare then just go out and have someone else make food for them for hardly anything.

do you know how much meat costs at grocery stores? i'll give you a hint, it's not cheaper than a double cheeseburger.
You can buy a pizza for a dollar.

I know the reasons people go to McDonalds, and it is cheap in comparison to real food with real ingredients, but you can buy frozen/readymade food and live a lot cheaper. I know because I do.

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 05:06 PM
You can buy a pizza for a dollar.

I know the reasons people go to McDonalds, and it is cheap in comparison to real food with real ingredients, but you can buy frozen/readymade food and live a lot cheaper. I know because I do.

these are americans we're talking about

pretty much sums up everything

we want tasty food now!

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:06 PM
You can buy a pizza for a dollar.

I know the reasons people go to McDonalds, and it is cheap in comparison to real food with real ingredients, but you can buy frozen/readymade food and live a lot cheaper. I know because I do.

yet you have the internet...

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 05:08 PM
yet you have the internet...

this means he has a lot of money

ugh people are so stupid

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:14 PM
no but it does mean that he isn't starving

ugh people are so stupid

Akira
08-22-2007, 05:17 PM
no but it does mean that he isn't starving

ugh people are so stupid

What are you blabbering about?

Whether or not he is poor is irrelevant, the point is that you can eat cheaper than McDonalds.

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:19 PM
no but it does mean that he isn't starving

ugh people are so stupid
I'm actually eating the mousepad.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:21 PM
What are you blabbering about?

Whether or not he is poor is irrelevant, the point is that you can eat cheaper than McDonalds.

think before you post.

Akira
08-22-2007, 05:23 PM
I have to think?
Not the person who doesn't understand eating cheaply even though you can afford internet access?

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:23 PM
we're talking about people that have to eat very cheap food to survive

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:25 PM
I have to think?
Not the person who doesn't understand eating cheaply even though you can afford internet access?
I think his point is that I'm wasting my money on the internet when I should be shelling out the extra little bit for gourmet McDonalds.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:30 PM
the point is that if you were really desperate for food, you wouldn't waste it on the internet.

Knifeboy
08-22-2007, 05:31 PM
.. He never even implied that he was desperate for food

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:35 PM
If I was desperate I would go to McDonalds.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:36 PM
.. He never even implied that he was desperate for food

then he shouldn't have engaged in a conversation by commenting on how he lives off of cheap food, considering we're talking about impoverished people who are desperate for food.

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:39 PM
Um I was demonstrating that it is possible to buy pre-packaged food cheaper than restaurant food. You need to cool your jets, top gun.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:43 PM
and you need to pay attention to what everyone has already said. people dont want to eat the same bland **** everyday, even though they're poor. and most pre-packaged food costs more. that's why people survive on **** like mcdonalds.

Knifeboy
08-22-2007, 05:44 PM
and you need to pay attention to what everyone has already said. people dont want to eat the same bland **** everyday, even though they're poor. and most pre-packaged food costs more. that's why people survive on **** like mcdonalds.

:confused::confused::confused:

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:45 PM
different fast food places taste different from each other, and each one offers over 30 different things to eat

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 05:47 PM
then he shouldn't have engaged in a conversation by commenting on how he lives off of cheap food, considering we're talking about impoverished people who are desperate for food.

um he said he lives off cheap food so what it doesn't mean he can't afford the internet

you're able to choose which luxuries you want you know, he chooses the internet over expensive food.

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:48 PM
and you need to pay attention to what everyone has already said. people dont want to eat the same bland **** everyday, even though they're poor. and most pre-packaged food costs more. that's why people survive on **** like mcdonalds.
My point was that lots of pre-packaged food is cheaper than McDonalds. And there's a lot more of it too.

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:49 PM
so why act like he's an expert on the subject if he's really not?

YouGottaBeCrazy
08-22-2007, 05:49 PM
My point was that lots of pre-packaged food is cheaper than McDonalds. And there's a lot more of it too.

not really

sexymuffin
08-22-2007, 05:51 PM
so why act like he's an expert on the subject if he's really not?

i'm sure he knows a bit about buying cheap food if he claims to do it all the time

i never heard him say he was an expert at starving, and i'm sure few americans can actually make that claim

Dave de Sylvia
08-22-2007, 05:51 PM
Do you work for McDonalds or something? I've never known anybody to get so angry over the claim that uncooked food is cheaper than cooked food.

DiesIrae
08-22-2007, 07:00 PM
i'm sure he knows a bit about buying cheap food if he claims to do it all the time

i never heard him say he was an expert at starving, and i'm sure few americans can actually make that claim

Unless you live in Compton. Then all you have is malt liquor and crank.

Reaganista
08-24-2007, 12:23 AM
except most of the time they do die, and when they don't die, they are so badly hurt that they have to be put down. cow's are put down without pain (or atleast should be). that's why dogfighting is animal cruelty, you moron.
except being eaten always kills a cow
every time
even if only one in a thousand dogs that got in a fight survived it would still be better to be in a fight than to be eaten

No I'm fairly sure the only part that matters is the bit the animal experiences.
are you retarded

Eliminator
08-24-2007, 12:23 AM
what if yuo eat a cow alive huh??

Reaganista
08-24-2007, 12:25 AM
which is why so many people below the poverty line in america are fat, it goes against the theory that if you have more money to spend, you eat fattier luxury food because everyone who has money can afford gym memberships and healthy upscale restaurants.
poor people eat at mcdonalds because they dont have kitchens
or
they're too lazy to make ramen noodles
which cost like $.30

Futue te Ipsum
08-24-2007, 03:41 AM
except in horse racing, it isn't a race to see who lives and dies. it's a business. and cheese burgers are consumed because people want to eat them. there's nothing positive to gain from dog fighting. it only leads to the unneccesary conclusion of dogs dying.Your intention does not dictate what happens. They still knowingly put those horses lives at great risk.