View Full Version : Low F# = Bass at its bassiest
HaVIC5
07-20-2007, 02:47 AM
So in the mail today came my SIT .165 guage low F# string that I kind of bought on a whim. I felt like the high F, while serving me well in some ways, wasn't up to snuff on others (very thin sounding string), so I decided I might try tuning my GT-7 F#BEADGC for a change. It took a while setting the bass up with the new tension distribution, but man oh man, if you've never played a bass with an F# string, I'd suggest you find one (good luck though). All the other notes on the other strings don't even sound like they belong on a bass when you play it. This string is what really makes a bass a bass.
Granted, it definitely does have its difficulties. The electronics don't really matter all too much, at least from what I've tested so far. My ampeg gets a pretty clear tone out of it, nothing amazing, but its not really muddy by any means. The main problem is in string tension. My bass is 34", and even with a string as thick as a suspension bridge cable, the F# string vibrates like crazy. This is what largely gives it more of the muddled sound, not the amp, and I've had to raise the action a bit higher than I would like in order to keep it from rattling against the frets constantly. But man, you should hear it.
In fact, you will, in the morning, I'll make a video. Should be sweet. Any of you all expirement with tunings below B?
gaslight
07-20-2007, 03:11 AM
Nope. What Ampeg rig do you have though?
Mr. Grill
07-20-2007, 03:31 AM
I like ADGCF. Thats lightweight compared to your 7 stringness.
Spirit Crusher
07-20-2007, 04:27 AM
Warwick have the Vampyre which is tuned F#,B,E,A. I really want to play a one of these bad boys, maybe next time in Melbourne. Post some clips of your massive Low F# if your microphone can handle it :thumb:
Charlie Manson
07-20-2007, 04:44 AM
I use EADG I haven't tryed your way yet
rh15951
07-20-2007, 08:21 AM
I used to tune my 5 string to ADADG with a .140 guage low A but that's it.
Radiobass81
07-20-2007, 09:33 AM
Never liked anything below D on the B string, although it's been growing on me.
Akira
07-20-2007, 10:44 AM
While the F definitely is thinner than I would like, I don't even use the B string that much. I would have no use for an F#.
Son of Magni
07-20-2007, 11:18 AM
I'm still waiting for my SIT .165 to come in the mail for my 9-string :(
Sablate McNuff
07-20-2007, 12:15 PM
I think I'm going to tune up my schecter F# - G and use it live for some serious rocking out.
\m/ (-.-) \m/
How much are SIT's strings anyway?
Son of Magni
07-20-2007, 03:10 PM
I think I'm going to tune up my schecter F# - G and use it live for some serious rocking out.
\m/ (-.-) \m/
How much are SIT's strings anyway?
Go to the Conklin site and they're under accessories I think.
The JoZ
07-20-2007, 08:57 PM
My 4 string is strung in a low ADGC most of the time, though recently I dropped it to G#-C#-F#-B. .145 gauge on the lowest string.
I experimented with F#-B-E-A on that bass a while back, my band mates wanted me to attempt to do a "bass drop" during a breakdown, by hitting a low B on the F# string, and downsliding really slowly. It kinda worked, but I didn't get nearly enough power out of it for me to like it...
Damn 10" speakers.
thelowsoundofbass
07-20-2007, 09:45 PM
I'm still waiting for my SIT .165 to come in the mail for my 9-string :(
Get a .195 as well and have a low C#.
lowsound
HaVIC5
07-21-2007, 12:13 AM
Well, recording this thing has been annoying. All i have right now is the built-in laptop mic for my computer, and all the low notes sound like is clanking - no substance whatsoever. Oh well.
I would actually seriously consider buying a .195 and string it up to F#, because that would eliminate all the annoying flopping. I tuned up the F# to a B and it was the best feeling B string I'd ever played in my life - plenty of tension, and a tight and focused sound.
Son of Magni
07-21-2007, 10:12 AM
Yeah, well I get the 165 and it's not much of an improvement. But it's usable. I'm seriously thinking about restringing as BEADGCFBbEb.
.195 would be pretty thick for an F# amirite? Aren't there other gauges? I think I've seen a .180 before.
While the tension might be good with a .195 tuned up to F#, wouldn't the huge string throw you off a little? The jump from .130 or whatever to .195 is pretty huge.
FunkMetalBass
07-21-2007, 11:33 AM
Well, I'm going to join the SIT .165 club also, except mine will be going on a 35" scale bass, so it should be a bit tighter and less floppy than havic's.
HaVIC5
07-21-2007, 12:09 PM
Yeah, I know 195 would be thick, but I haven't seen anything else heavier than 165. 180 would be ideal for a 34". 165 would work really well on a longer scale, its just than I'm stuck here with a scale that really isn't ideal for it.
FunkMetalBass
07-21-2007, 12:46 PM
Yeah, I know 195 would be thick, but I haven't seen anything else heavier than 165. 180 would be ideal for a 34". 165 would work really well on a longer scale, its just than I'm stuck here with a scale that really isn't ideal for it.
I don't know how Conklin's Snakeskins can get away with a .150 F#...
HaVIC5
07-21-2007, 05:04 PM
I don't know how Conklin's Snakeskins can get away with a .150 F#...
I was actually afraid that the 165 would be too thick. Silly me.
I don't know how Conklin's Snakeskins can get away with a .150 F#...
Fanned fretboard = long scale on the F# string
Yeah, I know 195 would be thick, but I haven't seen anything else heavier than 165. 180 would be ideal for a 34". 165 would work really well on a longer scale, its just than I'm stuck here with a scale that really isn't ideal for it.
You could ask some erb players like Jean Baudin, Garry Goodman, Stew McKinsey where you can get F# strings and shop around a little, I'm sure some gauge between .165 and .195 (or whatever a typical C# is) exists.
CthulhuDan
07-24-2007, 03:55 AM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=K57w9pdJPnY
Akira
07-24-2007, 06:18 AM
Fanned fretboard = long scale on the F# string
But Conklins I've seen don't have fanned frets...
HaVIC5
07-24-2007, 12:55 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=K57w9pdJPnY
I prefer my bass playing not to sound like balls, thank you very much.
HaVIC5
07-24-2007, 01:04 PM
My 4 string is strung in a low ADGC most of the time, though recently I dropped it to G#-C#-F#-B. .145 gauge on the lowest string.
I experimented with F#-B-E-A on that bass a while back, my band mates wanted me to attempt to do a "bass drop" during a breakdown, by hitting a low B on the F# string, and downsliding really slowly. It kinda worked, but I didn't get nearly enough power out of it for me to like it...
Damn 10" speakers.
At 145, I doubt that it was the speakers as much as the string. Right now 165 and sky high action is only just cutting it.
WhoDidTheElf
07-24-2007, 01:21 PM
I played one of those warwicks at GC through an Ampeg SVT Pro-3 into an Accugroove Whappo Grande. The only words to describe it is like, bowel movements. The low F was just thunderous.
Other than that it the bass was kinda meh.
BassVirtuoso
07-24-2007, 02:00 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=K57w9pdJPnY
Click click click click fretbuzz ruuuuun click click click duckish noise click click fretbuzz.
Oops sorry forgot tabs were illegal.
HaVIC5
07-24-2007, 04:41 PM
+1 for hilarity.
The JoZ
07-24-2007, 04:56 PM
At 145, I doubt that it was the speakers as much as the string. Right now 165 and sky high action is only just cutting it.
Well, I suppose, I mean. I haven't had a chance to try anything else.
I know for a fact that the .145 is an awesome A string, and even at G# functions well.
Gets real muddy past G#...
HaVIC5
07-24-2007, 05:28 PM
What kind of string is your 145? Seeing as 165 worked pretty awesomely as a B string (maybe a little too taught, but still very awesome), a 145 would likely be a great choice for a B.
The JoZ
07-24-2007, 06:57 PM
What kind of string is your 145? Seeing as 165 worked pretty awesomely as a B string (maybe a little too taught, but still very awesome), a 145 would likely be a great choice for a B.
In terms of brand? A D'Addario.
It's certainly a nice, tight B as well. I kinda worry about keeping it at a B for too long, admittedly, but it's without a doubt a tight B.
But Conklins I've seen don't have fanned frets...
You don't need to play a Conklin to use Conklin strings
also, some Conklins have fanned frets
Akira
07-26-2007, 03:58 PM
You shouldn't use Conklin strings whether or not you play a Conklin.
Overpriced strings FTL.
HaVIC5
07-26-2007, 05:27 PM
You shouldn't use Conklin strings whether or not you play a Conklin.
Overpriced strings FTL.
They're overpriced, yes, but they're SIT, and they make some damn fine strings. So yeah, you're paying like 70 dollars for a set of 7-string strings, but you're getting something good, AND its in guages that you won't find anywhere else.
rh15951
07-26-2007, 05:30 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=K57w9pdJPnY
That guy is ****ing cack.
Peterwgw
07-26-2007, 05:34 PM
That guy is ****ing cack.
he just seems to be making clicky noises
Mr. Tamzarian
07-26-2007, 06:33 PM
I was just looking around the Conklin site at the 9-strings. Do they even have strap buttons?
I was just looking around the Conklin site at the 9-strings. Do they even have strap buttons?
No, they have inputs for a strap lock system
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.