PDA

View Full Version : D.C. Madam Makes Love, Not War


Iscariot
05-02-2007, 11:19 PM
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- An attorney for Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the alleged "D.C. Madam," rejected accusations Monday that releasing a list of phone numbers used to dial Palfrey's high-end escort service amounted to blackmail.

"I call that due process of law," said Montgomery Blair Sibley, who represents Palfrey in a civil matter. "Why didn't we start in October if we were trying to blackmail people for money?"

Defending the "sexual albeit legal" service that she ran for 13 years, Palfrey said during a news conference that she expects the names of more clients to surface as the federal case against her moves forward.

The news conference came after a hearing in which Palfrey requested that the public defender representing her in the criminal case be replaced.

She filed a motion, citing "irreconcilable differences" with and "ineffective assistance of counsel" by public defender A.J. Kramer. She elaborated only to say that Kramer's assistance in the case is "lacking."

Palfrey initially said she would sell the list of clients' phone numbers to raise money for her defense. In the motion requesting Kramer be replaced, Palfrey asks the court to set aside $150,000 so she can retain private counsel.

She has said that because the government seized the assets from Pamela Martin & Associates -- which Palfrey calls an "erotic fantasy service" -- she could not immediately afford the legal bills she is facing in the multiple-count federal racketeering and money-laundering indictment.

Palfrey has given 46 pounds of telephone records to ABC News, she said, in hopes that the network can turn telephone numbers into names of clients who could testify on Palfrey's behalf.

Palfrey says she can't afford counsel

She said she decided against selling the records, even though a judge's order forbade the sale. While ABC "is under no obligation whatsoever to me, I do expect their reporting to help identify potential witnesses for my defense," she said.

"For me, this is an absolute necessity since the government has placed me in the untenable position whereby I do not have sufficient monies to undertake this extraordinarily expensive task on my own," she said.

Sibley added, "We don't have another option left."

Palfrey's prepared statements struck conspiratorial tones as she questioned why the government has made no attempt to charge any patrons or escorts if they, indeed, engaged in illegal activity.

Anyone who received or provided sex for money disobeyed her directives, and in some cases, their own "signed contracts," she insisted.

"I would expect the government -- as a matter of fairness and to avoid any hint of selective prosecution -- to charge each and every individual with the crimes of money laundering, racketeering and/or conspiracy as well," she said.

She implored the media to help her find out why she appears to be the sole target of the investigation.

"I believe there is something very, very rotten at the core of my circumstance and without money to hire my own investigators, I must rely upon your acumen and talent," she told reporters.

Two names have been released so far, though ABC News reports on its Web site that potential "witnesses" could include a "Bush administration economist, the head of a conservative think tank, a prominent CEO, several lobbyists and a handful of military officials."

Randall Tobias, a top State Department official, resigned for "personal reasons" after acknowledging to ABC News that he had been one of Palfrey's clients. Tobias told ABC News he never had sex with the escorts; rather, he would "have gals come over to the condo to give me a massage."

Palfrey apologized to Tobias on Monday but said she was dismayed that he never came to her defense "with this extremely valuable exculpatory evidence."

Earlier this month, Palfrey dropped the name of Harlan K. Ullman as one of her "regular customers," but Ullman -- a former Navy commander who helped design the White House's "shock and awe" military strategy for Iraq -- quickly scoffed at the accusation.

"The allegations do not dignify a response," he said. "I'm a private, not a public, citizen."

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/30/dc.madam/index.html

oh those poor lonely government officials

when no one else will love them an escort always will

Iscariot
05-04-2007, 12:29 AM
i can't believe no one has anything to say about the biggest sex scandal to hit washington since the clinton blowjob ordeal

thedeadwalk!
05-04-2007, 12:57 AM
I don't see the scandal. It's a legal service, yes?

Maybe an earlier article would be clearer. This one just seems to be about some later legal matters, not what's causing it.

Also, I saw a hilarious clip of Sean Hannity talking about lonely congressmen. It was almost sincere.

Iscariot
05-04-2007, 01:00 AM
according to the madam no sex was offered but when you hear about people like randall tobias stating that he just hired the "gals" to come to his condo and give him a backrub it's pretty obvious more is going on

and when 46 pounds of paperwork containing phone numbers of government officials who were steady customers of this service turns up it presents the question of just how deep does this prostitution ring go

thedeadwalk!
05-04-2007, 01:09 AM
Isn't there supposed to be a big story on it on ABC Friday night?

Iscariot
05-04-2007, 01:10 AM
i'm pretty sure there is actually

the news stations are going all out with this because they just can't resist a good sex story

MattSharpIsCool
05-04-2007, 01:22 AM
Eh, I'm not too fussed about it, to be honest. It's pretty immoral and irresponsible, since I'm assuming most of her "customers" are married, but it's their business, not mine. If they want to cheat on their wife, especially with hookers, then I'm glad they got caught.

At the end of the day though, it's just another sensationalist story that will be blown way out of proportion. It will take people's minds off of Iraq for a month or so, which I'm sure thrills some people.

gregulus
05-04-2007, 01:25 AM
i'm pretty sure there is actually

the news stations are going all out with this because they just can't resist a good sex story

actually, the news stations are covering this extensively because the American people can't resist a good sex story :( .

Iscariot
05-04-2007, 01:27 AM
well that too

Iscariot
05-04-2007, 01:29 AM
Eh, I'm not too fussed about it, to be honest. It's pretty immoral and irresponsible, since I'm assuming most of her "customers" are married, but it's their business, not mine. If they want to cheat on their wife, especially with hookers, then I'm glad they got caught.

At the end of the day though, it's just another sensationalist story that will be blown way out of proportion. It will take people's minds off of Iraq for a month or so, which I'm sure thrills some people.

it's deeper than that though randall tobias as i cited him earlier was in charge of the aids program and here he is having sex with "high class" female escorts it displays a level of hypocrisy and policy betrayal that is very underrated due to the attention currently directed at the war

MattSharpIsCool
05-04-2007, 01:38 AM
Oh. It didn't mention he was running the AIDS program in the article, I didn't know. Like I said, it shows irresponsibilty, and maybe he should be fired. But I'm sure it will get way too much TV time, just like the Clinton scandal did.