View Full Version : Should there be a US boycott of CITGO?
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 09:40 PM
I think that there should be because of it's connections to the Venezualen government. Your opinions?
666Ozzfan
09-21-2006, 09:43 PM
Link to something about it?
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 09:47 PM
http://www.citgo.com/AboutCITGO.jsp (mentions its ties to Venezulea)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citgo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petr%C3%B3leos_de_Venezuela_S.A.
That bottom link isn't working for some reason.
BassRevelation
09-21-2006, 09:48 PM
yeah, lets eliminate a good percentage of our incoming oil so we can pay more ridiculous prices for gas.
Doesnt make sense
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 09:52 PM
yeah, lets eliminate a good percentage of our incoming oil so we can pay more ridiculous prices for gas.
Doesnt make sense
Considering Hugo Chavez and his government is getting some of the money (which in turn they fund their military with) and Chavez's alliance with Iran I think it's totally worth it.
BassRevelation
09-21-2006, 09:56 PM
Considering Hugo Chavez and his government is getting some of the money (which in turn they fund their military with) and Chavez's alliance with Iran I think it's totally worth it.
1.There is no real alliance yet between the two countries.
2.There's no way the venezuelan army would defeat ours with all the money from oil income. Iran, however, has a much stronger army, with or without venezuela.
3. Chavez is no real threat to the United States
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 09:59 PM
1.There is no real alliance yet between the two countries.
There's been a TON of treaties signed by Chavez and that President Amhajinadad (sp?) of Iran. Plus Chavez has been to Iran meeting with the Iranian president.
BassRevelation
09-21-2006, 10:05 PM
There's been a TON of treaties signed by Chavez and that President Amhajinadad (sp?) of Iran. Plus Chavez has been to Iran meeting with the Iranian president.
bush has met with Abbas. Doesnt mean a thing.
as of now, there is no real alliance in existence, although its been suggested that one is brewing. Also, a boycott would be counter-productive, seeing how it would hurt us a whole lot more. Pretty embarrasing when we crawl back to Chavez to ask him for oil.
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 10:07 PM
bush has met with Abbas. Doesnt mean a thing.
as of now, there is no real alliance in existence, although its been suggested that one is brewing. Also, a boycott would be counter-productive, seeing how it would hurt us a whole lot more. Pretty embarrasing when we crawl back to Chavez to ask him for oil.
Except there is a treaty saying if someone attacks Iran Venazuala will go fight on the side of Iran or vice versa. Sounds like they're good friends to me.
BassRevelation
09-21-2006, 10:10 PM
Except there is a treaty saying if someone attacks Iran Venazuala will go fight on the side of Iran or vice versa. Sounds like they're good friends to me.
Venezuela is the least of our worries when a human wave attack of 500,000 Iranians are coming right for us. Im just saying they're not a significant factor when it comes to military altercations.
run don't walk
09-21-2006, 10:12 PM
Venezuela is the least of our worries when a human wave attack of 500,000 Iranians are coming right for us. Im just saying they're not a significant factor when it comes to military altercations.
I know Iran is our main enemy but I just thought considering Venezuala who is an ally of Iran has and owns a major oil company operating in the USofA we should maybe boycott it.
BassRevelation
09-21-2006, 10:38 PM
dont you think a boycott would hurt us though? I mean, I can see why you would want us to boycott them, seeing how we view them as the enemy, but a boycott of oil would definitely hurt us. Im sure most people would rather pay for cheaper gas and let his comments go out the other ear.
I really do see why a boycott would make sense, but the boycott would be detrimental to our economy, not theirs.
Lufnoops
09-21-2006, 11:55 PM
PDVSA dominates the oil industry of Venezuela, the world's fifth largest oil exporter.
Yeah that would hurt in the event of a boycott.
666Ozzfan
09-22-2006, 05:31 AM
I seriously don't see the point, all it would do is increase the oil price for the US, and considering, you have it relatively cheap over there anyway. Last time I checked it was about $1.50NZ per L here. Not to sure, I don't have a car, but it's getting ridiculous
spitfirejunky
09-22-2006, 07:01 AM
If the rest of the world had to treat the US the same way you'd like to treat Venezuela... there'd be no global economy.
The US has been doing business with criminal administrations for decades. Why stop now?
John Paul Harrison
09-22-2006, 09:35 AM
Boycott of CITGO = short term solution.
If we cut off Venezualen oil, then why not cut off Iranian oil? Isn't Iran just as obnoxious?
shaqadelic
09-22-2006, 01:04 PM
Ok lets put this into perspective. BP, the biggest gas retailer in the US, has about 15 000 shops. Citgo has about 11 620 retailers. By boycotting Citgo, you will cut off one of the top suppliera. And basic economic theory will tell you that when supplier decreases, price in the market will go up. In this case, massively.
So no cause it will devastate the US' economy and is pretty much the dumbest thing that can be done. Sheesh.
http://www.pmaa.org/public/partners/partners.html
Auberge le Mouton Noir
09-22-2006, 01:13 PM
There's only one thing that makes americans boycott a company;
high prices.
shaqadelic
09-22-2006, 01:19 PM
Not for gasoline apparently. I recall demand is increasing despite increase in market price.
Auberge le Mouton Noir
09-22-2006, 01:59 PM
Not for gasoline apparently. I recall demand is increasing despite increase in market price.
If one supplier had higher prices than the other it would be boycotted.
I said company, not product.
Lufnoops
09-22-2006, 02:20 PM
There's only one thing that makes americans boycott a company;
high prices.
You're right this is the cardinal rule here, it's all a game of incentives.
shaqadelic
09-22-2006, 02:55 PM
If one supplier had higher prices than the other it would be boycotted.
I said company, not product.
How does this relate to the thread? Citgo is not selling at a higher price than other suppliers.
John Paul Harrison
09-22-2006, 04:35 PM
There's only one thing that makes americans boycott a company;
high prices.
Montgomery Bus Boycott?
Iskandar
09-22-2006, 05:14 PM
Montgomery Bus Boycott?
Unless the bus system was private, that would be boycotting a municipal service, not a company.:)
Reaganista
09-22-2006, 05:18 PM
I think that there should be because of it's connections to the Venezualen government. Your opinions?
that would be a horrible idea
but considering how the DPW thing went down
I wouldn't be surprised if it happened after some people made an issue of it
but only if gas prices go down some more
stevensonmat2
09-22-2006, 05:22 PM
I think we should leave anything to do with gas alone right now. Prices are going down, and Id like them to keep going down.
Auberge le Mouton Noir
09-22-2006, 06:22 PM
How does this relate to the thread? Citgo is not selling at a higher price than other suppliers.
I WAS SAYING THAT AMERICANS DON'T TEND TO BOYCOTT COMPANIES
IS THAT OK?
good
EinzingerIsGod
09-22-2006, 06:46 PM
There's talk now of covering the big Citgo sign in Kenmore square in Boston, which you can see above the green monster in left field. Personally I think they should just forget about it and move on.
stevensonmat2
09-22-2006, 06:52 PM
people are petty, that wil never change.
italic zero
09-22-2006, 06:56 PM
There's talk now of covering the big Citgo sign in Kenmore square in Boston, which you can see above the green monster in left field. Personally I think they should just forget about it and move on.
oh hell no! that thing is an invaluble navigation tool
EinzingerIsGod
09-22-2006, 10:36 PM
oh hell no! that thing is an invaluble navigation tool
Yes it is.
Danish
09-29-2006, 01:43 AM
The US shouldn't boycott Citgo, the Venezuelan gov't should cut the US off (with the exception of selling subsidized heating oil to poor Americans).
And all of this about the relationship between Iran and Venezuela is ridiculous. The US is friends with Colombia, a country that has perhaps the worst human rights record in the world. They are also friends with Pakistan, a country ruled by a dictator that seriously threatens nuclear non-proliferation and, hence, global security.
This isn't to justify said relationships; it's to suggest that those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Billy_Silvers
09-29-2006, 04:37 AM
Here's why we should boycott citgo.
I'm sure you've noticed lately how gas prices have fallen? Well, this is really really hurting those at the top, the top .05% of wealth holders. Don't you understand they're trying to put their kids through an elite ivy league college? Pay off yachts to keep the economy afloat?
We can't leave them out in the cold. Imagine how much it would hurt them if those dirty people that make 1/1000000 of what they make (95% of us citizens) could actually spend their money on stupid things like health care, baby formula, or, the heart of the issue, affordable gasoline.
My God, it would be a shame to buck the trend of Exxon mobile posting the highest profits in the history of the world. It would be a blow to the very heart of capitalism itself! We mustn't let that happen!
And of course don't forget Chavez is training terrorists with the help of evil Iran. Don't you know they're also coming up with plans to stop the flow of sunlight into our homes and turn all children under the age of 3 into sausages.
Those evildoers!
[please don't attack my statistics, they're close but I'm feeling lazy]
Stupid knee-jerk idiots.
Boycotting Venezualan products is incredibly counter-productive, especially at a time when US companies have made major inroads into its market. Also, you might want to consider how far Venezuala is from Iran and the thousands of reasons its a bad idea for them to do anything to the US besides pointless bluster.
Volumnius Flush
09-29-2006, 05:05 PM
I think we should. We are essentially giving money to the enemy. Kind of like what happened with Iraq, if Iraq had intended to use the money against us. It's blackmail really.
Krabsworth
09-29-2006, 05:08 PM
HOw are they an enemy they are just talking trash who cares.
Yes, they would definitely really consider their largest trading partner (50.7%) to be the enemy. It makes sense,yes?
Volumnius Flush
09-29-2006, 05:11 PM
It is Chavez who is the enemy. He is the enemy not because we antagonized him, but simply because he is an antagonist! He hates America and he is killing the middle class by capitalizing on his oil-rich economy.
Ahh, the old gimmick poster. Nonetheless, the points still apply to the retard TS.
Volumnius Flush
09-29-2006, 05:20 PM
Ahh, the old gimmick poster.
I didn't see Fenwood post in here.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.