View Full Version : what came first. chicken or egg?
peeted
05-29-2006, 12:16 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/
aparentley the egg.
intresting.
DaveIsWrong
05-29-2006, 12:22 PM
Actually, you could also say that the egg came first because the question never specifies which species of egg. And see as how dinosaurs laid eggs long before chickens ever existed, the egg did come first. But that's just based on a technicality.
peeted
05-29-2006, 12:24 PM
well yea but the comparison and the choice of article in the sentence strongley sugest that the egg be a chicken egg.
spitfirejunky
05-29-2006, 12:30 PM
Never thought of it that way.
Danger Bird
05-29-2006, 01:11 PM
But can you really call an egg created by two non-chickens a "chicken egg"?
Britney Diva
05-29-2006, 01:22 PM
But can you really call an egg created by two non-chickens a "chicken egg"?
Depends upon whether there's a chicken in it or not.
Danger Bird
05-29-2006, 01:26 PM
Depends upon whether there's a chicken in it or not.
Says who?
Britney Diva
05-29-2006, 01:29 PM
Says who?
Mother Goose?
Danger Bird
05-29-2006, 01:33 PM
What the **** does a goose know about chickens?
Curtis89
05-29-2006, 01:33 PM
I'd think anyone who's taken biology would have already figured it was the egg for the same reasons this article mentions.
dislocated214
05-29-2006, 01:35 PM
Egg.
/end.
Danger Bird
05-29-2006, 01:36 PM
I think the real question is: Which is more delicious? Of course the answer is egg.
italic zero
05-29-2006, 01:37 PM
I used logic and figured this out when I was 12.
coheneran
05-29-2006, 01:38 PM
This is all good and fine, but what does it forbode for us commoners? Not higher taxes I hopes.
Anyway, this question is philosophical and was answered scientifically, according to the theory of evolution. According to ID, the chicken came first, because God first created animals, not their eggs.
Curtis89
05-29-2006, 01:41 PM
I think the real question is: Which is more delicious? Of course the answer is egg.
You must be kidding.. Chicken is way better.
Substitute
05-29-2006, 01:47 PM
You must be kidding.. Chicken is way better.
I second that.
Danger Bird
05-29-2006, 01:48 PM
You must be kidding.. Chicken is way better.
Maybe fried, but if you pitch every way of preparing chicken against every way of preparing egg, it's no contest.
sweboy
05-29-2006, 03:06 PM
If you look at it in a different way, you could say that the chicken came first. It depends on how you define chicken. As 1. An embryo with the DNA of a chicken, which will later become a chicken, or 2. A borned chicken (the reason for this option would be the idea that it's not a chicken until it has fully turned into one physically, even if it has the DNA of one)
If you go with 1, the egg came first: The first chicken egg is layed by a different specie.
If you go with 2, the chicken came first: The first chicken developed from the egg/embryo of a different specie.
I would personlly go with option 1, like the scientists in the article, and say that the egg came first.
PerpetualBurn
05-29-2006, 03:11 PM
Why the bloody hell can't I get a research grant to figure out this kind of obvious stuff?
coheneran
05-29-2006, 03:17 PM
Try for a research grant to see if falling trees make noise when no one's around.
PerpetualBurn
05-29-2006, 03:20 PM
I've already answered that one. It comes down to a dull and semantic argument over the definition of "noise".
coheneran
05-29-2006, 03:27 PM
Answer me this then, oh wyse one:
How long is a string?
PerpetualBurn
05-29-2006, 03:29 PM
Twice as long as half a string.
coheneran
05-29-2006, 03:30 PM
Fine, fine.
What is the difference between a duck?
PerpetualBurn
05-29-2006, 03:33 PM
One of both its legs is the same.
coheneran
05-29-2006, 03:35 PM
Damn you google!
PerpetualBurn
05-29-2006, 03:36 PM
I didn't google it! It's hardly a new question.
SubtleDagger
05-29-2006, 03:37 PM
What is the meaning of life
:confused:
Stevie
05-29-2006, 03:38 PM
what came first, the sperm or the egg?
The first chicken which would produce eggs would not have been inside the egg though. So then the chicken comes first!
coheneran
05-29-2006, 03:50 PM
What is the meaning of life
:confused:
Everyone knows that; 42.
Der Übermensch
05-29-2006, 04:05 PM
An Evolutionist would say the egg; a Creationist would say the Chicken...
RockAndRoll
05-29-2006, 04:05 PM
I used logic and figured this out when I was 12.
:lol: me too, why is this news?
peeted
05-29-2006, 04:07 PM
is there any way of applying kants epistomology to this question? because if there is it would realy help my philosophy revision lol
Futue te Ipsum
05-29-2006, 05:29 PM
Of course it was the egg. I can't see why anybody bothered to give this stuff recognition.
coheneran
05-29-2006, 05:36 PM
But the egg had to come from somewhere.
italic zero
05-29-2006, 06:53 PM
yeah, from an almost-chicken
Der Übermensch
05-29-2006, 07:05 PM
But the egg had to come from somewhere.
Somewhere there is a very fine line of distinction where a bird creature just short of being called a "chicken" layed an egg containing a bird creature just enough to be called so...
Britney Diva
05-29-2006, 08:21 PM
what came first, the sperm or the egg?
The first chicken which would produce eggs would not have been inside the egg though. So then the chicken comes first!
But there had to have been an egg for the chicken to get into first.
Lupus
05-30-2006, 08:22 AM
Already figured this out.
PerpetualBurn
05-30-2006, 11:10 AM
But there had to have been an egg for the chicken to get into first.
You don't understand biology very well.
sjada
05-31-2006, 06:55 PM
Doesnt it say for serious disscussion.
That makes sense. I always though it was the chicken but now I know that evolution happened when a child was born different than it's parent. Therefore the modern day chicken hatched from the egg of a species that's similar but not what we would call a chicken.
ImAnIdiot
06-05-2006, 03:38 PM
Isnt an egg a cell? so, if the theory of evolution is correct, cell slowly be came an egg, or some thing like that?. so that means the egg came first..... I think
This probably made no sense but thats my way of looking at it
PerpetualBurn
06-05-2006, 04:21 PM
The egg contains a haploid cell which will not become a chicken until fertilised by the male gamete (also haploid) they will then form a diploid zygote and live happily ever after thanks to mitosis.
Futue te Ipsum
06-05-2006, 04:23 PM
Isnt an egg a cell? so, if the theory of evolution is correct, cell slowly be came an egg, or some thing like that?. so that means the egg came first..... I think
This probably made no sense but thats my way of looking at itEvolution is correct, yes, but you appear not to understand it.
You understand that it is correct though, which is a lot more than those creationist retards.
PerpetualBurn
06-05-2006, 04:26 PM
Chicken is fertilised egg.
no chicken is what you eat man egg is egg u kno
PerpetualBurn
06-05-2006, 04:44 PM
I eat egg. Scrambled. Fried. Poached.
Atomic Rain
06-05-2006, 04:48 PM
Genetic mutations take place at the mitosis of cells and so an egg comtaining a chicken came before the egg.
Besides, dinosaurs had eggs... :rolleyes:
EDIT:
Just read the article...
his hasn't puzzled anyone since.. yeah. It's a simple idea.
oh yeah i forgot commies only eat chicken
PerpetualBurn
06-05-2006, 05:00 PM
That's because the bears in the streets of Moscow steal the eggs.
exactly and then they sand back the chickens
Chris_lpp
06-06-2006, 04:37 PM
i think that in the beginning there was a bird....which becam (called itself) a chicken, met this really ugly orangfe clucky thing and they shagged etc etc...
oha and being on topic....who gives a ****?
SalientArbiter
06-06-2006, 09:08 PM
Reptiles came before birds, and they laid eggs. Egg came before chicken.
Endofstory.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.