View Full Version : Football back in LA.
Kurtz
11-11-2005, 01:44 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2219883
YES
///
So, finally, the NFL and the city of Los Angeles have finally reached an agreement. I swear to God I thought we we're never going to get a team back, but from what I've heard the future looks good for us. Although, I do think that the team should play at the Rose Bowl, because I don't like what they're going to do with the Coliseum.
Red Stripe
11-11-2005, 09:41 AM
Exactly what we all need, yet another California team.
And Nawlins is gonna be pissed. You know it's them who the league is gonna move.
Mambuto_O'Mally
11-11-2005, 10:20 AM
The thing is they're one of the most populated in areas in the world and they don't even have a team. It's pretty stupid that they don't have one, and I believe they need one.
Kurtz
11-11-2005, 01:40 PM
Exactly what we all need, yet another California team.
LA has the second biggest commercial market (behind New York of course), and 14 million people have been without a home team for 10 years now. Florida has three teams, and it's a much smaller state than California, and I don't see anyone complaining about them.
And it probably is New Orleans, but you had to see it coming. The city it dead, and they just can't have their home teams touring all around the south.
seanman99
11-11-2005, 04:20 PM
Face it boys, LA just can't hold down a football team.
ihatemybass
11-11-2005, 06:05 PM
i beleive were getting the saints. Wont the exisiting team have to change its name though?
ZEROthirtythree
11-11-2005, 07:59 PM
It could just as easy be Jacksonville or Minnesota.
Kurtz
11-12-2005, 12:58 AM
Make it the Rams.
I don't want them back.
devonte_da_drummer
11-12-2005, 10:42 AM
I'd say New Orleans and Minnesota are by far the most likely choices. New Orleans is a likely choice because of the hurricane situation. Minnesota because of the recent scandals, the almost certain to be denied stadium proposal, and the lack of success of the team on the field. Though it will probably be the Saints that move, there is a definite history in Minnesota teams moving to Los Angeles. You have the Lakers who have won many championships since the move, and the Los Angeles Kings of hockey who were previously the Minnesota NorthStars. After the move, they got the great one out of Edmonton and I believe won a Stanley Cup or two.
iliketoplaydrums10111
11-12-2005, 12:46 PM
I just say move the 49'rs
They are going to get their **** wrecked by an earthquake sooner or later. But in reality, by by 'Nawlins.
pikester
11-12-2005, 09:44 PM
The Minnesote North Stars of hockey moved to Dallas to become the Dallas Stars. I believe that the LA Kings were an expansion team, and have never won the Stanley Cup.
As for a team moving to LA, the Arizona Cardinals seem like a pretty good choice as well.
SocalJoker89
11-15-2005, 11:59 PM
wait is it gonna be an expansion team
Kurtz
11-16-2005, 12:02 AM
I'm not sure, I haven't heard any stuff about it since last week.
As for a team moving to LA, the Arizona Cardinals seem like a pretty good choice as well.
They just built a new stadium for the Cardinals so that would be a huge rip off to the city.
(>dragon~guitarist<)
11-16-2005, 05:13 AM
I thought they were saying like The Saints were going to be moved to San Antonio if anything since Katrina happened? I forgot where I read that, I think it was in the NY Times or something.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.