Writer Profiles

[Nightvision]

Okay, here's one that could either crash and burn or work beautifully. The idea is as follows:

You select a writer on this forum (ie don't do one for a famous writer) and write a profile for them. The profile should contain the following:

The writer's name.

A link to three good examples of their songs.

A description of their writing style - what they do, what they don't do, and things that distinguish them from other writers.

Why readers would like the writer

Why readers wouldn't like the writer


- this is a fairly in-depth profile, so it may be a good idea to make sure you pick a writer you've critiqued a few times.

Fire away. :)

[Nightvision]

Okay, I'll start... I'll go for a profile on APS, seeing as I've most likely critted more of his songs than I have anyone else's... Now watch as I get this completely wrong and he laughs at me.:thumb:


Profile: A Perfect Sonnet

Songs:
The Globe (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266468)
A Light In August (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=343346)
I've Been Busy Living Through You (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=404510)

APS, as the more observant of you will have already noticed, draws heavily from the writing style of Bright Eyes' Conor Oberst. That is to say, there are obvious influences in both the subject matters and writing styles, but not so strongly as to be a carbon copy of Oberst's style. Where APS' strengths lie are in his ability to conjure up a line that works on multiple levels at the same time.
For a good example, read 'A Light In August' - No-one could say that this is a song where the meaning is particularly deeply buried, but on the same note, the imagery here is vibrant and strong, without being over-simple and cliched.
Another strong point is his ability to write a strong piece whilst working within restrictions - 'The Globe' is a good example of this - there is an immensely strong Shakespeare theme throughout the piece, yet the actual meaning of the piece is never unclear - a surprisingly difficult feat, carried off very well in this case.

Why Readers Would Like Him:
An ability to combine imagery with a line that will make sense to most readers first time.

Why Readers Wouldn't Like Him:
Can sometimes be inconsistant
May not appeal to hardcore imagery-philes.





There... man, that sounded like a major league ***-kiss. It's someone elses go now. :)

[A_Perfect_Sonnet]

I'm next, and I've chosen...

Profile: Roller Queen
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/4665/n113142963006736045965rw.jpg
Lyrics:
http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=322327 (March in Gotterdammerung)
http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=406230 (Say Hello To The Coast)
http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=315129 (Anhedonia)

Rally Driver Dan is a veteran of these boards, and one of my more prefered lyricists. Though sometimes his genius can put him ahead of himself poetically, he can almost always give an extremely strong and though provoking couplet or one liner to at least make you appreciate part of the piece he has meticulously constructed. The vocabulary used in his pieces may sometimes become obtrusive to understanding his plot or subject, but if you have a dictionary handy, it always makes his songs just all that much better. Take for example the simple elegance of this stanza, vocabulary and all. Well though out, brilliant construction, and one of the best verses I've seen on these forums.

I, feeling old and the air gaining stagnancy,
Returned to my etherised retreat.
If I had a camera, I'd show you
That the sky better scrapes its own reprieve.

Brilliant.

Why you should like him:
His ability to construct some pretty darn brilliant verses.
Diversified choices in subject matter and style.

Why you should despise him:
He thinks he's better than you.
Wanted for embezzlement.
Sometimes gets ahead of himself in writing.

[TojesDolan]

Yes! I want to give a shot at:

Sloth

The moon over minneapolis (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=355473)
some story this is (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384208)
I'm waiting (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=334068)

Sloth, one of those guys that you feel like critiquing and getting critiqued by, is one of the most constant regulars here at S&L. He's been here since 2003, and as far as I can tell, this is the only forum he roams (Correct me if I'm wrong). Among his various poems, songs and writings, he goes from different styles, forms, and ways to reach out to the common reader. Despite being an oldster here, he hardly ever makes any differentiation between newbies and veterans. He critiques (when possible) anyone having something worth checking out.

I know of this guy basically because once I made a poem, and he was one of the few that critiqued me, but the thing that I remember the most is that despite he didn't know me, and I wasn't really offering a c4c, he was willing to help and critique, which I think is his best quality, both as a moral person and a songwriter.

Now, Sloth's style, as stated before, covers a wide range: from really simplistic poetry, to somewhat complex pieces that get your attention. The theme he masters is the Dungeons-dragons-princesses, semi-medieval style, which he distorts and gives his a rather characteristic signature: Refer to some story this is.

Why readers would like the writer
Friendly with new users, as well as pretty much anyone else.
Cooperative and willing to help when possible.
Amazing imagery and use of language
Reachable content: No matter whta kind of person you are, you understand what he is talking about in his poems.

Why readers wouldn't like the writer
He isn't that constant when it comes to being here. I suppose he has a life (unlike others including me lol).
His join date may scare people away (I don't know, that happens quite frecquently)
I don't know. Maybe his songwriting can be too deep at times.

***

I didn't really make justice to Sloth, I've known him since probably June this year and he has like, a lot of work in the past that's really amazing.
I'll make something more thorough later, I guess.

[ITRIEDVOODOOONCE]

Profile: factor46

Songs: Candi (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=403444)
The Suburban End of Nova Scotia (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=348696)
To Us (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=378335)

This writer may not be one of the most popular writers in the forums, but is definatly one of the most talented. Proving that over used structures and common rhyme scheme are not needed to make a song catchy and unforgettable. He also has an uncanny ability to continue a subject from one line to the next without fumbling or sounding monotoneus.

Strangle me closer, let's propose a toast,
But no going overboard again, that last one was a mess.

With his work becoming more and more brilliant with each line, he is easily becoming one of the greats of this forum.

Why Readers Would Like Him:
Very unique with his writing
Can make flow like whoa

Why Readers Would Hate Him:
Very cryptive
Song styles may annoy closed minded viewers

[SubtleDagger]

I actually like this idea. I'll stick it for the time being.

[factor46]

Profile: theredwonder

Songs:
Your Blanket (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=308304)
Gossip Can Kill You (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=283545)
Me and Your Photographs (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=274580)

Theredwonder, another of these forums writing veterans, has a very unique writing ability. In all of the songs of his that I've critiqued, I've never come across one that was lacking in imagery, descriptive wording, and a softer, poetic tone. The way he writes his lines, and knows what he's writing about, is remarkable. It's obvious that he doesn't just throw some random crap on a piece of paper and call it a song. He thinks about his work, and it's been proven through what he comes up with. Every once in awhile though, he'll throw in some confusing lines in a piece. Not particularly to throw the reader off, but more for poetic and abstract quality. He does a great job getting his point across, and conveying whatever message it is he's trying to relay. And even though he's hardly on this part of the forums anymore, he's definately a writer to check out.

Why Readers Would Like Him:
His abstract ideas and lines appeal to any writer.
His sufficient use of poetic imagery is outstanding.


Why Readers Wouldn't Like Him:
He sometimes confuses the reader with his 'different' way of writing.
His visits to this section of the forums are sparce nowadays.

[IOWNU200]

Profile: thirdeyeblindislit

Songs: Bombs over Baghdad part 2 (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=277559)
No Comfort in Sorrys (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=300537)
End to the pain (A song to Jennifer) (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=280795)

Thirdeyeblindislit was probably one of my favorite writers in my time here at S&L. Not only was his writing pretty brilliant, the way he conducted himself on the boards was something to be admired. His writing uses lots of cleverly worded metaphors. THe imagery may not be too strong and a bit cliche at times, his wording and clever use of metapohrs and similies makes him one of my personal favorites. You can tell he spends lots of time thinking about his writing, and you can really feel the lyrics, something he always talked about. His lyrics were from his soul, they weren't just an intelligent thought written down and developed, it was a concept he was feeling in his heart. For this, I commend him.

Why readers would like him:
He writes from his heart.
Good use of metaphors and similies.

Why readers would dislike him:
A bit cliche at times.

[ITRIEDVOODOOONCE]

xKONRADx

SONGS:necrotizing fasciitis (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=415106)
If i were anorexic, would she take the blame? (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=343905)
AN ODE TO A.P.S (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=245871)

This writer brings a very creative side to MX. No 100% rhyme or reason between any of his songs, each one is unique and inspiring. It is almost garenteed that you will need a dictionary to understand his very complex vocabulary, but yet everything always ties together. Whether it be awkward and unique rhymings, powerful line by line songs, or even rap, he has proved himself on many occaisions to be a powerful writer.

Like him:
Makes you think about what your reading
even if you dont understand, the overall tone makes his stuff a good read

Hate him:
Makes you think about what your reading

[Nightvision]

OMGZ! Teh post in teh writerprofiles thread!!!!!1!!!1111one1!

Come on boys, let's wake this thread up a bit. :)

Profile: Disco Donkey

Songs:
Intergalactic Fisticuffs (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=428627)
Shoot From The Hip, Aim For The Heart (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=427864)
My Wife, The Arsonist (http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=430581)

Easily the most under-rated writer on the forums at the moment, DD has a real flair for weaving interesting subjects and subtle imagery together to create pieces that really jump off the page and come alive before your eyes.

Example:
In a dream state, like Arizona, when your throat is parched
I dance with gasoline
And keep a set of matches in my pocket for persuasion
Now what were you saying?

Excellent, excellent writing.

as stated earlier, among Disco's greatest strengths are his ability to find an interesting subject to write about, and to write about it well. This opens up a whole new world of images and metaphors for him to play with, and you can generally be assured that when you click a Disco Donkey thread, you're not going to be reading a song about how his girlfriend left him and his parents don't understand him.

Why Readers Would Like Him:
He writes about unique subjects and situations
Very strong imagery and metaphors

Why Readers Wouldn't Like Him:
Some of his subjects don't always quite come off
He mugs old ladies for drug money

[FA]

Ahh, keep this poor thread alive.


slack (formerly slackjaw)

http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=454300
http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=446655
http://www.musicianforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=406644

Slack is truly an extremely creative and intelligent writer, as well as a helpful critquer. He is accurate in his wordings and very competent with his grammar. His writing style varies from friendly fantasy to beautiful and simple. He can twist simple words into angelic phrases, which really brings his pieces together. His eye for detail and grammar has really accelerated his status on the S7L forums and his writing gets better and better.


And into the radiant green they fled again, slipping between the trees
and out of sight like shadows in the sterling sunlight. While it's all
just a game, and you know you'll never be free to roam, when you're
alone you sometimes wonder how it would feel to just get up and go.
You wonder, way down in the depths of your circuitry, if you'd know
what to do, given the opportunity. Your head swims with sorrow when
you ponder such things, as the questions which arise tend to require
the answers you fear. Logic says you shouldn't be thinking the way
that you do, but you can't help it, and continue to dream instead.

Pure beauty with such simple wordings and phrases. He sort of has a stream of consciousness meets prose way of writing poetry/lyrics.

Why readers would like him:
1. He has an alluring way of writing.
2. Helpful to others.
3. Intelligent with grammar and critiquing.

Why readers wouldn't like him:
1. Occasionally, some of his pieces can be confusing and/or tedious.
2. He doesn't post his work too often.
3. He eats kittens.

[DeadReligion]

Oh, my ****ing turn. I choose:

Profile: Drumass04

Tim's strong point like mine, is with imagery, with description, which is beautiful. His topics are quite varied and original; Kristallnacht, for example (in "Honest Souls Live On") to Easter (in "Flames Of The Crucifixion") to his father (in "For My Father") he has a tendency to be verbose, which can be a bit annoying, though, if you're willing to look up the words you don't know, the imagery is quite beautiful, though it still has a slight implication of pretentiousness. Sometimes Tim's imagery gets in the way of his plot though, which, as most know, isn't good, a mix of both is the best way to go, unless you're making a poem that is solely imagery, a painted scene.

Strengths:
Imagery,
Line Structure,
Metaphors.

Weaknesses:
At times verbose.
Sometimes gets lost in his world of imagery, and forgets about the plot.

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=468538 < "Honest Souls Live On."

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=432599 < "For My Father."

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/showthread.php?t=463273 < "Where Nature Lives, Love Cannot."

[Mitch2oo6]

I get lost in Slacks imagery too. I might do one of these later, maybe on ATC or maybe you Dead Religion, ill see...