best band name ever.
|
| |
Sup bro.
Additionally, it's a good review, it just needs a conclusion.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
"or something like that" never works good in any review.
Also, the review feels half-finished. Add another paragraph and a conclusion.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Thanks, this was a first effort to test the waters so I didn't put my all into it. I'd appreciate any and all criticism for my next review.
|
| |
I'd say it needs a little elongation, but the metaphors are strong, and your descriptive words are...well...descriptive. As minor and stylistic as it is, be careful not to repeat the same word too many times for one comparison. But to each their own.
|
| |
Dude dhxp45 read my Worker Bee review and I'll link you the album. Together we can get sputnik to listen to tiny post rock bands like these and If These Trees...
|
| |
I love this band.
|
| |
"Unlike much of the band’s comrades"
comrades is a weird word choice...maybe try peers? or contemporaries?
Other than that, it was pretty well written. just, like everyone else said, it should be longer.
|
| |
you follow everyone else
|
| |
im not indie enough to think for myself
|
| |
given that im currently wearing a goonies t shirt, i applaud their name
|
| |
anyone checked out their new album? good?
|
| |
Two tracks into this; am I listening to Caspian?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
New album is great, it's more of the same, but it's definitely more song based/hook driven and less atmospheric, if I had to draw a difference.
Band NEEDS more recognition, song oriented post-rock, far more digestible
|
| |
what's with band names and goonies references
|
| |
What a stupid fucking name
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Stupid name aside (lets be honest, stupid names in post-rock are abundant, this one going the extra mile) this band is surprisingly solid, easy 4.
|
| |