Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds
Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!!



Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Jesus couldn’t save this

Back in the early 80s, Nick Cave’s noisy garage-punk / blues band The Birthday Party were a whirlwind of turbulent, manic energy. Their distinctive sonic storm was raw, aggressive, and invigorating. Whatever your take on their bold cacophonous releases such as Junkyard or Prayers on Fire were, they were unlikely to conjure feelings of indifference. This potentially divisive element to Cave’s work continued well into his career with the Bad Seeds. Take what is commonly considered by many as Cave’s magnum opus in 1994s Let Love In – here the band’s sound is vibrant, unpredictable, and complemented by an idiosyncratic madness. Now it must be said that his follow-up project wasn’t inaccessible and certainly more poetic in comparison, yet the band were still putting on one hell of a show. This concept highlighted by the whirlwind of dark cabaret influences, the gothic-tinged atmosphere, and numerous bursts of percussive energy, with Cave’s versatile vocal performances providing a fitting centrepiece.

Fast forward to the present day and eternal wisdom dictates that apparently things can change in a quarter of a century – who knew, right? People change, they often mellow, sometimes becoming reflective, reserved even, no longer seeking to ruffle feathers as that youthful vigour fades. It is an inevitable contrast, especially if one’s earliest artistic incarnations were brash, brazen and belligerent. In fact, it would be naïve to expect anything to the contrary. So why when knowing this, does Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! seem so monumentally devoid of urgency? Why when hitting play and being immediately presented with an up-tempo, potentially anthemic, barnstorming opener of the same name; does it all feel so tepid? From this point forward ’Dig’ continues to underwhelm. In “Today’s Lesson” we learn that telegraphing a lifeless and unearned chorus hook, results in an unsatisfied audience. “Night of the Lotus Eaters” attempts to reverse course, temporarily distracting the listener with… wait for it… DYNAMICS! This restrained and unassuming cut is a welcome curveball, deviating from the neutralising alt-rock glossiness that plagues the majority of ’Dig’s’ runtime. Even so, ‘Lotus’ ultimately fails to build upon any of its initial potential, eventually suffering an all-too-familiar fate – with most of these songs being guilty of overstaying their welcome. No part of what’s contained here represents this as emphatically as the closing pair. “Midnight Man” is a repetitive and unsatisfying rocker, following a well-trodden structure, tempo, and tone. It’s habit of resetting to a punch-absent chorus in the most predictable of ways, doing it no favours. However, despite the penultimate track’s misgivings, it is completely usurped by the utterly barren, meandering and obnoxiously lengthy slog that is “More News From Nowhere”. For a concluding gambit it works perversely well, essentially presenting the audience with one last reminder of Dig’s’ faults; a seemingly never-ending and misfiring microcosm of what preceded it. The swansong’s only saving grace being a vaguely amusing sense of irony awarded by its title, as it limps aimlessly towards the listener’s eventual salvation.

If Dig’s’ biblical themes were genuinely intriguing, if the narratives held any emotional weight, it would be easier to forgive its sonic limitations. Alas, no such redemption is on offer. Cave’s attempts at quirky humour are ultimately rendered impotent by a disparity between the banality of his songwriting and any attempts at playful lyricism. What’s left is a mostly competently performed yet uninteresting shell of an alt-rock album, one where the protagonists have long since left its carapace.

Unlike in the resurrection of Lazarus, even Jesus couldn’t save Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! from eternal slumber. Nevertheless, Cave’s legacy remains strong, blessed with an impressive body of work that shines brightly, despite this isolated moment of darkness.


user ratings (436)
3.7
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
Demon of the Fall
February 24th 2023


33544 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Okay, here it is. Reviewed for Mort's 'review a random album' game. I really struggled with a) formatting the track names / refs to make it more readable etc. and b) simply writing a negative review. Interesting exercise regardless.

Please suggest edits if they're needed, I know this is far from perfect (or just plain bad). Maybe this can be saved even if the album cannot?

DadKungFu
Staff Reviewer
February 24th 2023


4708 Comments


Really like the title track on this, haven't heard the rest. Good rev

Pheromone
February 24th 2023


21317 Comments


neg neg neg this is the worst review ive ever read

Pheromone
February 24th 2023


21317 Comments


jk this is great

agree ahrd also


Demon of the Fall
February 24th 2023


33544 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I already noticed a line I don't like, this is after a fair bit of proofreading and making last minute changes...



'No part of what’s contained here represents this as emphatically as the closing pair.'

- wouldn't "more emphatically than" be better?

DadKungFu
Staff Reviewer
February 24th 2023


4708 Comments


Either works tbh, maybe "more, than" flows a bit better.

Trifolium
February 24th 2023


38854 Comments


Demon this is a very lovely review.

It even has alliteration ("brash, brazen and belligerent"), a thematically relevant summary with some good punch (final paragraph), and a very active, pleasant flow. And that section starting with "For a concluding gambit" is perfectly underscoring the validity of your rating.

Here, have a huge big POS.

Demon of the Fall
February 24th 2023


33544 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Thanks Trif! (the 'gambit' part was perhaps my fave section by far, the rest of this sort of pales in comparison on reflection).

Agreed DadKungFu, that would flow nicely. I appreciate the input. I'll make minor changes as and when.

Trifolium
February 24th 2023


38854 Comments


I think it shows that it was your fave section. It reads like it was written with a smile on the face.

Mort.
February 24th 2023


25062 Comments


great review man, posd

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
February 24th 2023


60212 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Review is v good and easily pos-worthy. Content thoughts (rly like the way this is presented and how clearly it reads - so content thoughts):

"People change, they often mellow, sometimes becoming reflective, reserved even, no longer seeking to ruffle feathers as that youthful vigour fades. It is an inevitable contrast, especially if one’s earliest artistic incarnations were brash, brazen and belligerent. In fact, it would be naïve to expect anything to the contrary"

this is a cliche and overused generalisation out of keeping with your otherwise v focused framing of the Caveverse, and i don't think frames this irreverent cartoon-scuzz era of the Bad Seeds/Grinderman particularly accurately. definitely might have been worked in later as a possible explanation for why the album falls flat to you, but i'm really unsold on it as an a priori.

i'd also dispute that it's tenable to critique Cave with the lyrics as an afterthought to the songwriting as per the penultimate paragraph, partially bc his methodology has always had the latter spring out of the former, but mainly because so much of this album's depth and attraction are helmed by lurid imagery and there is far more to pick apart there than the vague shape and flavour of the rock instrumentals. this doesn't have to redeem those from being lackluster, but i think your arguments that limited dynamics, repetitious slogs etc. are what lets this down would be far more convincing if they explained a) the character and construction of Cave's sermons and b) what these demand from the songs and c) how they let one another down with depth proportionate to their significance

otherwise woo this has a thread. Moonland (inexplicably catchy + iconic opening line) and, sometimes, the closer/opener are the only ones i revisit from this, but shit's okay

Demon of the Fall
February 24th 2023


33544 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I'll level with you Johnny, I didn't completely understand this album and therefore it was difficult to review. I'm quite sure your final points about the narratives went completely over my head (while listening / researching) and Cave has such a huge back-catalogue, that it was hard to put the proper listening time in for context.

I should have re-purposed the cliched bit (or it possibly could've been removed), but I wanted to segue the opening paragraph 'neatly' into the next, explaining the history of Cave's work - as I thought it was relevant to the overall point I was making. My only previous point of ref for Cave was TBP and I was desperate to make this relevant somehow (possibly to my detriment). I don't love how it turned out, so the critique seems fair.

Thanks for the helpful notes. I will reflect upon this.

Honestly, I will hesitate before reviewing anything I'm not already familiar with again. It was tough.

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
February 24th 2023


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Very good review and enjoyable to read, pos’d. I kind of agree with your points even though I really like Today’s Lesson, Moonland, Hold on to Yourself, Jesus of the Moon, and More News. Lotus Eaters and Midnight Man are pretty good too.

The rest is more upbeat, bluesy post-punk that sounds like a throwback to early Bad Seeds and Birthday Party that I don’t really care for. Overall tied with Nocturama as their worst since before Your Funeral….

Mort.
February 24th 2023


25062 Comments


Johnny out here writing “a priori “ with no explanation instead of a more common alternative huh

Real pseud behaviour



MillionDead
February 24th 2023


5286 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I like this album a lot but this is still a strong write up. You did a great job expressing yourself on the subject matter for not having big preference for Cave or this sound overall. Pos

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
February 24th 2023


60212 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"Honestly, I will hesitate before reviewing anything I'm not already familiar with again. It was tough."

noooo don't hesitate - you did a great job here (+ research was obvious and covered your tracks) and most of my comment was for discussion rather than crit; think this review is v clear and largely justified from the standpoint you're coming from, and that's the main thing

"Johnny out here writing “a priori “ with no explanation instead of a more common alternative huh"

stop using your philosophy BA as an excuse to assume that other humans can't easily deduce your precious field terms when used in a straightforward context

Mort.
February 24th 2023


25062 Comments


I feel really a posteriori attacked right now

Trifolium
February 24th 2023


38854 Comments


That sounds... sexy 😏

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
February 24th 2023


60212 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

*peach emoji* *sword coming out of sheath emoji* *nick cave lyrics emoji*

Mort.
February 24th 2023


25062 Comments


kantian fallacious a posteriori

ripe for innuendo



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy