Tokio Hotel
Kings Of Suburbia


2.0
poor

Review

by cagedbutterfly USER (15 Reviews)
November 20th, 2014 | 14 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: After a five year hiatus, Tokio Hotel returns with a less than stellar record.

When you hear the name 'Tokio Hotel', you would most likely think of the German pop band sensation and thousands of annoying screaming fans. The band became insanely popular while the members were still young teenagers. It has been five years since their last release, and during those five years it appears the boys have went through some.. changes. For example their appearance. They went from wearing dark clothes and eyeliner, to wearing flashy clothes and jewelry. And even sporting facial hair.

But perhaps the most notable change is the music, as they gear more towards sexually based lyrics. The lyrics from the albums lead single 'Love Who Loves You Back' might add a slight level of discomfort to the listener. With lyrics like: "what's underneath the moon and stars. what's underneath our clothes sweetheart?" and "There's a call on you while, there's a snake in your bed. And it's telling you something (it says) I like it like that" ..gross. These guys are adults now and no longer teenagers. So they are completely eligible to have sexually based lyrics. But they are so in your face with it you can't help but feel uncomfortable.

Disturbing lyrics aside, the song is well-produced. The giggles that appear almost discreetly during the chorus, adds a measure of kinkiness to the song and make it a fun listen. The album as a whole has a sort of 80's dance music vibe to it. Which is something very different from their previous more rock-based albums. In some parts of the album, the band is able to make it work. But in other parts, it just feels a bit repetitive and forced. Like in the song 'Covered In Gold' which has a lot of electronic sounds in it, and it even features the use of auto-tune.

The lyrical content of the album is even less impressive. It appears as if the band made no serious attempt in the songwriting department. For example, these are the lyrics to the chorus of one of the singles 'Girl Got a Gun': "Girl got a gun, girl got a gun gun gun, girl got a gun, girl got a gun, bang bang'. So much lyrical depth huh? The song 'Stormy Weather" is similar with the lead singer just constantly repeating the words "stormy weather" during the chorus. It just makes the songwriting seem bland and lazy. Very similar to the way a lot of pop songs are written nowadays.

The title of the album is 'Kings of Suburbia'. But besides the titular track, there aren't really any other tracks that really support this theme. It makes one really wonder why they chose that name for the album. The whole album just feels like your at some awkward dance party, with everyone wearing strange costumes and bunny-outfits. Yeah, those kind of parties. The album does have some decent tracks that really save it from being a total dud. Like the soft-piano ballad 'Run, Run, Run'. The song is brittled with emotion and is probably the best track on the album. 'Invaded' is another great track. It has some lovely piano playing and moving lyrics. Bill does a good job in providing that emotional vocal delivery that's almost transparent in this album.

Tokio Hotel decided to go a whole new direction with this album. But ended up with a sub-par record with a lot of bumps in the road. Though I do commend the band for trying something new. I just wish they had a clear direction first, rather than just blatantly make a record with a whole bunch of sexual innuendos and electronic sounds, with barely any good lyrical content. The band is still young and have a lot of years ahead of them. But if they continue to put off efforts like these, it might affect if anyone would listen or not.



Recent reviews by this author
AFI AFI (The Blood Album)My Chemical Romance Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys
Kendrick Lamar To Pimp a ButterflyRodriguez Cold Fact
Tokio Hotel HumanoidPaul McCartney New
user ratings (36)
2.1
poor


Comments:Add a Comment 
VaxXi
November 20th 2014


4418 Comments


Its deff not that bad, but its deff not good.

amanwithahammer
November 20th 2014


585 Comments


Do people listen to albums like this just so they can write negative reviews?

Mister Twister
November 21st 2014


2721 Comments


Summary should be a single sentence.

cagedbutterfly
November 21st 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It isn't that bad I suppose. But it is far from great.



cagedbutterfly
November 21st 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I actually wrote a positive review for one of their albums lol! this band def has potential. But this album is a dud.



cagedbutterfly
November 21st 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

oops! i didn't know haha. changing it right now.

HolidayKirk
November 21st 2014


1722 Comments


"So much lyrical depth huh?"

Not really a valid criticism when you're talking about a chorus. Most choruses looks pretty stupid when you
free them of context.

cagedbutterfly
November 21st 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

True. That's especially the case when in a pop song unfortunately. It seems the band is gearing more towards making songs like these.

CaptainAaarrrggghhh
November 21st 2014


432 Comments


Band's always been writing pop songs, their first two records are a genius commercial scheme designed to cash in on the whole "emo" craze. They succeeded.
Now, it seems they try to catch up with current trends.
The saddest fact is that their songs have shard writing credits with three or four professional pop songwriters. So it's not really a "band", more of a "project". A vehicle for cash.

cagedbutterfly
November 22nd 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

You serious? Professional pop song writers? The band has hit an all time low. The litte respect I had left for them is shattered.

RadicalEd
November 22nd 2014


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

They have always been trash.

CaptainAaarrrggghhh
November 24th 2014


432 Comments


Did I say they were any good? "Professional" meant they get paid for writing this stuff.

cagedbutterfly
November 30th 2014


584 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

If their doing it for money then it's gonna suck

CaptainAaarrrggghhh
December 2nd 2014


432 Comments


That's the whole point of my rant



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy