Falloch
This Island, Our Funeral


4.5
superb

Review

by SomeGuyDude USER (36 Reviews)
February 22nd, 2015 | 32 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Falloch find their own.

I never understood the outright hate that Falloch got with Where Distant Spirits Remain. It was fairly forgettable, but far from outright vile. Insofar as it was clear Agalloch worship (right down to the name sharing far too many sequential letters for comfort), it was at least moderately well executed, and the band showed a lot of promise if they would just shed the trappings of the style they seemed far too eager to imitate.

Well, after one of the two original band members left and the remainder hired him a whole new lineup, Falloch's sound has changed. Is it for the better? Oh my yes.

Gone are the days of atmospheric black metal paint by numbers, Falloch has settled into a new sound that, frankly, is a little hard to define. It's got a smattering of post rock and post metal here, a bit of black metal there, some progressive sprinkled around and plenty of old folky bits to spice it up, but put on the spot to quickly explain what TI,OF sounds like... I'm at kind of a loss. It's "heavy" in the sense that the riffs are big and it uses fast drumming, but this isn't mosh pit heavy. This isn't headbang heavy. Acoustic guitars spring up but don't signify that the song is going soft at that point. One of Falloch's favorite tricks, indeed, is using their biggest and heaviest riffs with the most melodic vocal lines.

What TI,OF has that WDSR lacked is cohesion. Instead of sounding like a pot of all the tropes and trappings of a genre being used because, well, they're SUPPOSED to be used, each element serves the greater whole. These are still long tracks, four of them clocking over nine minutes, but they move and swell, ebb and flow the way songs of that length should go. These tracks aren't long due to nonstop repetition of a single guitar lick until you're so sick of it you want to reach through your headphones into the past and slap the band upside the head for thinking that song length and quality are directly linked. Rather, they're lengthy because they have several movements, riffs build upon themselves, later passages of tracks are callbacks to earlier.

Special attention needs to be given to vocalist Tony Dunn. This man's voice is simply gold. I've heard criticisms of Falloch that their music lacks a soul or genuine emotion of its own, but I cannot fathom how this is the case with the performance Dunn gives. His voice soars, layered and harmonized at times, bringing a haunting and ethereal character to instrumentation that, without it, would sound closer to standart post-metal. For anyone to listen to "Brahan" and come away saying Falloch has no soul to their music would leave me wanting to know exactly what constitutes "soul" in music. The composition to it represents everything this style can do but rarely does. It's not dark and grim, nor is it uplifting. It's more like staring into the grand canyon or watching a star go supernova, that feeling of awe.

The instrumentation and production are similarly spot on. If you're listening to these albums through Apple Earpods or laptop speakers, then it's possible a lot of the heft of TI,OF will be lost. This is music that needs proper speakers or headphones with which to completely envelop the listener. Each pluck of a string, each thick snap of a snare drum, the cymbals washing and cascading about, all of it comes across with the kind of production that serves to bring every last note played to its maximum effect.

The album isn't perfect, of course. Track 5, the appropriately named -, is completely unnecessary. Absolutely, genuinely not needed. It's a little over two minutes of a single ambient sound that goes nowhere. It does provide a bit of air between the end of Brahan and the monstrous opening of I Shall Build Mountains, but ten or fifteen seconds off of - and put on the end of Brahan would have achieved the same goal more effectively. Some might also find the songs somewhat repetitive in their reliance upon titanic riffs with emotive singing that breaks into acoustic passages (but then could that not also be said of others?), and certainly there will be those who want to trim fat away.

More than anything else, music of this ilk needs to connect to its listener, and it's often hard to critique or praise an album if it fails or succeeds to do that. Two people listening to the same album may come away with wildly different interpretations. While one hears a bland, tepid slog of try-hard music done by imitators with no identity of their own, another may hear a goosebump-inducing magnum opus done by a group of musicians who took familiar elements and created a masterpiece that makes your heart swell and your eyes water. If the music fails to connect, any of its strengths feel pointless. If it connects, any of its flaws feel irrelevant.

What this means is if, for whatever reason, Falloch fail to hit those intangibles that grip you as a listener, then all my crowing of all of the album's massive strengths in composition and execution will fall flat. If that's the case, then the best I can do is implore you to listen again. Let go of any biases you might have based on the band's name or their last album. Once This Island, Our Funeral finds purchase, it will take you on an emotional ride the likes of which few albums in the murky realm of "post" and "atmospheric" metal are capable of. It really is that good.



Recent reviews by this author
Death Squad (IRN) جنگ ابدیBorn to Murder the World The Infinite Mirror Of Millennial Narcissism
Xavlegbmaofffassssit.... Gore 2.0Six Feet Under Unburied
Zeal and Ardor Stranger FruitSkinless Savagery
user ratings (33)
3.3
great
other reviews of this album
DarkNoctus (1.5)
This Album, Our Funeral...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Jots
Emeritus
February 22nd 2015


7562 Comments


(edit: fixed)

BMDrummer
February 22nd 2015


15096 Comments


these guys still exist interesting

cryptside
February 22nd 2015


2406 Comments


Awesome review, agree with Johnny about the apologetic tone in the penultimate para though. The whole idea of issuing a 3.5+ to an album is to sell it to the reader; make them feel that it will be worth their time if they like what they read in your review.

LunaticSoul
February 22nd 2015


2398 Comments


Liked the review but it's really long man.

I remember reviewing their first disc for the website I used to write for and I got attacked by several users saying that it was an amazing disc not influenced by Agalloch at all. Yeah my ass, as if the name doesn't say everything already, lol.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
February 22nd 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Good review. Bit long though.



The guy that does Saor is one of the dudes in this band right? I've been wary of checking out their first album due to Noct's super negative review.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
February 22nd 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I do think that last sentence makes for a pretty weak ending.

SomeGuyDude
February 22nd 2015


377 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Good calls on the critiques. Going back to fix them now (it'll have a different ending in a few minutes).



GameofMetal, Saor is the guy who left Falloch, and while I was okay with their first album it's not highly recommended. This, on the other hand, is a huge revelation.

Artuma
February 22nd 2015


32762 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

where distant spirits remain had some moments of decency but it's a terrible, terrible album

emester
February 22nd 2015


8271 Comments


This is an improvement over the first album, but going from very shitty to just shitty isnt really something to be proud of.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
February 22nd 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

So the guy from Saor is not on this record?

cryptside
February 22nd 2015


2406 Comments


Hmm, seems be wildly varying opinions on this band. I am going to check. The review makes it sound pretty great.

SomeGuyDude
February 22nd 2015


377 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

BTW I realize the review is long, but man I could write about this thing for twice as long as I did easily. I tend to review albums I really like (which is why most of my reviews are 4-4.5), and this is one that INSTANTLY went on my favorites list, up there with Hesperian Death Horse and Dying Sun.

LunaticSoul
February 22nd 2015


2398 Comments


I was just pointing out that while your writing is pretty nice and flowing the review still is long and you may expect people to give up the read (as I did) ;)

SomeGuyDude
February 22nd 2015


377 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

GameofMetal, that is correct. Soar was the other half of Falloch.



TBH, I like this album a LOT more than I liked Aura. However, if you like Saor, I don't know if you'll like TIOF because this isn't black/folk whatsoever. It's like the two halves of Falloch split into two projects that were each FAR better as result. Falloch took its post/progressive side and Saor took the black/folk, rather than a weird and clunky blend of the two.



LunaticSoul LOL yeah you've got a great point there. Good chance a lot of people won't hang around for all of it, but hopefully the rating will get people to listen. That's all I care about!

emester
February 22nd 2015


8271 Comments


Nah, I think I remember hearing that Marshall broke away from this project.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
February 22nd 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Aura was frickin fantastic. I'll check this out though.

DarkNoctus
February 22nd 2015


12200 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

The instrumentation and production are similarly spot on. If you're listening to these albums through Apple Earpods or laptop speakers, then it's possible a lot of the heft of TI,OF will be lost. This is music that needs proper speakers or headphones with which to completely envelop the listener.




thank you for dedicating several sentences to something that could be said about any album ever



you really need to work on making your writing more concise, you keep reiterating the same points over and over again without saying much at all.

ComeToDaddy
February 22nd 2015


1851 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The debut was just totally inoffensive and bland. I don't hate it, and I see no reason to not recommend it to someone new to the genre, but there was an appalling amount of plagiarism in it. There's just absolutely no reason to listen to it when everything's been done elsewhere.



Having said that, I'll give it a spin based on this review. You repeat yourself a bit, but your writing flows really well and you did a great job communicating why I should check this out despite my feelings on WDSR. Pos'd

Valkyrion
February 22nd 2015


1161 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

>This is music that needs proper speakers or headphones with which to completely envelop the listener



nah pretty sure you need imagination for this not expensive headphones



heard a few tracks off this and they remind me of Woods of Ypres, not unlistenable but basically poor atmospheric rock with drawn out songs

ExplosiveOranges
February 23rd 2015


4408 Comments


Never cared enough to check the debut, but the review has managed to convince me to try checking this album at least. As many have said above, you should really try to avoid being redundant and stay concise, but overall, you've got a pretty good flow and supported your points well. Pos.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy