Architects
Lost Forever // Lost Together


2.0
poor

Review

by Robert Garland STAFF
March 11th, 2014 | 521 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Lost forever, lost together, we have no idea where we are.

It’s been said before; time and time again that metalcore has lost its basic originality. With so many bands pushing for the accolades that have been reached by countless acts before them, the modern scene has been watered down, diminished leaving the fans of the genre desensitized. This might sound a little harsh but for those who build their soundscapes off the exact same formula without actually deviating into something original or worthwhile are simply going to become stagnant, with no direction. In this day and age simply doing the same things over and over is not good enough, modern day listeners need more. I will admit that Architects did reach a certain peak with Hollow Crown back in 2009 and re-creating a sound that’s successful can easier be said than done, but a further three albums down the line shows a band failing to make the same impact. Lost Forever // Lost Together is a bland showcase of wasted potential all summed up in a number of excuses.

Architects 2014 release holds an abundance of lazy, uninspired wailed screams, pointless audio excerpts and over-bearing instrumentation. Some of the album is salvageable, but for the most part Lost Forever // Lost Together loses direction and resorts to the genre’s stereotypes, including those ever-hated quasi-breakdowns. Despite the Searle brothers being the only steady members since 2004, their hold on the band’s sound should be more noticeable. Even the Dan’s drum work is average. Lost Forever // Lost Together needs a more technical focus to match its melodic sound. As it stands, it becomes half-assed as the instrumentation is restricted to a simple progressive state. Sure, this creates an air of atmosphere, but Architects are capable of much more. It seems the melodic cleans of Sam Carter hold the most interest for this Brighton based four piece. In a sea of mediocrity, the emotive cleans is the only metaphorical arm sticking out of the surface that doesn’t need saving from the raging waves. Take the album opener for example. ‘Gravedigger’ hits with the typical energy you’d expect from a band in today’s metalcore scene. After a smattering of rung out cleans, the riffs are up tempo but change quickly into a layered chug fest. If there’s anything to say about this track it’s the fact that it sets the mood for the rest of the record; stereotypical, plain failing to leave the desired impression. Lost Forever // Lost Together continues moving the band’s sound, but it’s a regressing movement as stale as week old bread.

Unfortunately for Lost Forever // Lost Together, you can’t go into this album (assuming you’ve heard the band’s other albums or are a fan of the genre) without having a point for comparison. If everyone else has done this before than what are Architects actually doing to set themselves apart? Rather than commit ourselves to a sense of complacency, listeners should be asking for more. It’s not right to say “it’s nothing different/I’ve heard this a thousand times better” and still be happy with it. Lost Forever // Lost Together’s sound may have been fresh (or possibly ground-breaking) ten years ago, but with an over-population of similar minded bands this British metalcore band will slip into mediocrity. Think about it; is an album like this going to be viable in twenty years? Or better yet will Architects still be Architects? Chances are the answers to both those questions will be no. This album is not life-changing, genre-bending and probably will not stand the test of time. It’s only judgemental to not look to what the future holds if you have no care for tomorrow.



Recent reviews by this author
Cognizance PhantazeinSarmat Determined To Strike
Thy Catafalque AlföldEsoctrilihum Astraal Constellations of the Majickal Zodiac
Blindfolded and Led to the Woods Rejecting ObliterationImpetuous Ritual Iniquitous Barbarik Synthesis
user ratings (1047)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
iChuckles (4)
Not groundbreaking, not forward-thinking -- just loads of aggressive fun....

jaspvr (4.5)
Perhaps Architects have finally found their sound with album number 6...

Nikkolae (3)
Hollow Crown this is not....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 11th 2014


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It's not okay to set the bar low.



Been a while, can't understand the high average on this. Mediocre at best.

FearThyEvil
March 11th 2014


18525 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

agreed so much

Spec
March 11th 2014


39371 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

damn harsh

XingKing
March 11th 2014


16148 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Little too harsh but I'd agree

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 11th 2014


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't think I was harsh at all : [

lucasjcockcroft
March 11th 2014


3721 Comments


people keep saying Architects are capable of so much more
but they really aren't

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 11th 2014


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I think they've still got something up their sleeves if only they directed themselves without conforming to trends within the genre.

TomArnoldsArmpit
March 11th 2014


3082 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

the first and last songs are dope. everything else is meh

Trebor.
Emeritus
March 11th 2014


59810 Comments


did they really need two fucking /////

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 11th 2014


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

You don't like those in the titles?

DeathGrinder
March 11th 2014


153 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Fourteen people gave this a five star rating. Wow.

Faraudo
March 11th 2014


4600 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

And 4 people gave it a 1, it's really not a 1. That's the kinda thing I hate at times, many people on this site are really not objective.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
March 11th 2014


70239 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

well rating albums objectively would be kind of retarded wouldn't it



that being said having some sense of objectivity to balance your subjective rating is good cuz music is both objective and subjective

Faraudo
March 11th 2014


4600 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah, that was kinda what I wanted to say, but some people really don't know how to balance that, I mean, I get why lots of people dislike this album or think it's mediocre, but it's not a 1 at all.

DeathGrinder
March 11th 2014


153 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

It's not a five either, and more people voted that.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
March 11th 2014


70239 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5



Yeah, that was kinda what I wanted to say, but some people really don't know how to balance that, I mean, I get why lots of people dislike this album or think it's mediocre, but it's not a 1 at all.





there is very little music that deserves a 1 imo i hardly ever hand those out

Faraudo
March 11th 2014


4600 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@Pots: Yeah, they're reserved for Emmure, mostly.

@DeathGrinder: That's precisely my point, it doesn't deserve 1's, but it also doesn't deserve 5's.

Wizard
March 11th 2014


20508 Comments


Awesome review. You've summed up my thoughts about this genre as a whole perfectly. Metalcore is something I so rarely come back to.

ShitsofRain
March 11th 2014


8257 Comments


the argument

BigPleb
March 11th 2014


65784 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This is growing off me hard.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy