AC/DC Back in Black
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Aeaon
June 6th 2005


188 Comments


Good album, but I honestly think they're a better band with Bon Scott.

Green Day1989
June 25th 2005


1 Comments


This is why they call it the 2nd Greatest Selling Album of all time. It's 2nd to Michael Jackson's 'Thriller'

masada
June 25th 2005


2733 Comments


Um, it's not the second. Eagles Greatest Hits 1971-'75 is #1, Thriller is #2, The Wall is #3, etc.

http://members.aol.com/PaulHry/music/riaa.htmlThis Message Edited On 06.25.05

SouthernRocker
July 4th 2005


12 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

you shook me all night long diserves a 5. This cd is one of my favorites and it made ac/dc carrer even greater. I didnt mean to put .5 i meant 5/5.
This Message Edited On 07.04.05This Message Edited On 07.05.05

iheartlennon
July 4th 2005


1 Comments


i think shook me all night long deserves more than a 4 its probably my favorit AC/DC song i give it a 6.5/5

angusmaster
July 5th 2005


23 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

If you like shook me all night long and 80s music , you need to download the shook me all night long remix. Its awesome in my opinion.

angusmaster
July 5th 2005


23 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I think its sold 20 million.

angusmaster
July 7th 2005


23 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it sold 20 million , i think srry for the double postThis Message Edited On 07.07.05

thunderstricken1029
July 23rd 2005


1 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i think its a great album, but it gets old after a while. i know so many people who, when they hear the name ac/dc, they immediately think of back in black. but overall, its a pretty good album, and brian johnson is indeed an awesome singer

misterb2007
July 25th 2005


1 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Man if you don't love this album then there is something seriously wrong with you. And you have no idea what great music is!

Killtacular
July 25th 2005


1314 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

You're a funny guy.

Romencer17
September 3rd 2005


84 Comments


Good album. Would've been better with Bon though.

Tenfootbrett
September 3rd 2005


149 Comments


brian johnson doesn't sing. He yells. Annoyingly, and statically. His voice doesn't change from song to song. I mean, the notes he's singing. They're the same all the time. And aside from the solos, AC/DC sucks in every instrumental aspect, ESPECIALLY drumming.

WHY ARE THEY SO FAMOUS? Same reason as the Rolling Stones. Catchy, droning pop shit, and being in the right place at the right time.

Romencer17
September 4th 2005


84 Comments


You don't like it, stick to your mainstream sucky rock then.

2muchket!
September 15th 2005


900 Comments


I agree the bass and drums isn't very good but the vocals and guitar are exceptional I

ninjasmurf
September 15th 2005


28 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

tis a gd album

Cravinov13
October 26th 2005


3854 Comments


I just don't understand what's so big about these guys. I really don't. Almost all their the guitar chords are the same notes and patterns and the singer, in all honestly, sux, and is really friggin annoying! Sure, I like Hells Bells, Back In Black, and to songs from Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap, but that's it really. Maybe it's just cause I'm not an 80's music fan.

DownPaymentBlues78
October 27th 2005


278 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think you guys should know about the bon vs. brian issue, that bon had seen brian perform before, and really liked him, so when trying to choose a new vocalist, they had this amazing singer that bon scott approved of.

The best AC/DC albums are as follows:

1. Powerage
2. Back in Black/Highway to Hell
3. I'd go with Let There Be Rock.

DownPaymentBlues78
October 27th 2005


278 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Well if you have any respect for Bon, and know that he actually found a singer like that very good, you might have at least some respect for Brian. And if youd listen to brian at all during the early 80s in BIB, FTATR, Flick of the switch, youd realize that he doesnt sound like you described him at all. Around the time of the razors edge is when his voice really has lost its power and could sound annoying to some. but listening to the 80s stuff doesnt sound like that at all.

DownPaymentBlues78
October 28th 2005


278 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

his voice doesnt sound anything like that. you are thinking of his voice on the razors edge/ballbreaker/ stiff upper lip. Here, and on For Those About To Rock especially his voice is very sharp and powerful. If you listen to any song on For Those About to Rock, you'd understand the power of his voice, and realize the stupidity of saying he sounds like a parrot in the early 80s.

At least Brian Johnson CAN sing, unlike these new f.ucking emo bands and "punk" bands.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy