Alice in Chains Dirt
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
P3arlJamm3r
June 26th 2007



8 Comments


I don't understand how you could say Layne's singing is annoying. Along with Cornell, Vedder, and Cobain, Layne is considered one of the finest vocalists the 90's produced, and that opinion is shared by many people. You need to see him perform Man In A Box live. The way he sings the chorus with such intensity is amazing. Anyways, great album, forever rip Layne, you're a legend in my book.

UnderFlames
April 7th 2008



268 Comments


Cons: Vocals


oh come on.This Message Edited On 04.07.08

rotterdog
August 20th 2009



487 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This should really be the default review. The current one kinda sucks. This album simply rules.

SteelErectedb4you8er
December 20th 2009



2613 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This album is the reason I started to play guitar. I stole this album from my sister's boyfriend at the time, and when I put it on and I first heard "Them Bones," I knew I wanted to play guitar. This album is a classic and every song on here kicks ass. "Junkhead" is probably my favorite.

Foxhound
December 31st 2009



4570 Comments


Gotta love this album.

Greggers
January 5th 2010



2375 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

OH YOU COULDN'T DAM THAT RIVEEERRRR

SephirothBlade
January 12th 2010



100 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

u no wot it pisses me of tht people have to judge and argue over whos better and all this bollocks...kurt wasnt bad nirvvana wasnt bad, AIC wernt bad and niether was layne, they were both fuckin amazing people and bands, overrated and underrated is alod of crap.. how can nirvana be overated if they sold millions and have millions of fans? how can aic be underated? not underated not overated.. they are both great, weather u like them or not...ease up on the shit that people fink..

Romulus
January 12th 2010



8410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Regardless Alice in Chains > Nirvana.

EVedder27
January 12th 2010



6088 Comments


pretty much all of them>Nirvana

Romulus
January 12th 2010



8410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Gotta agree with you there

BrandNewBoognish
January 12th 2010



1021 Comments


Just because Nirvana were the most popular, people hate on them. I wish that a band as good as them were in the mainstream today. They were a hell of a lot better than Pearl Jam, that's for sure.

Romulus
January 12th 2010



8410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Just because Nirvana were the most popular, people hate on them.


Agreed

I wish that a band as good as them were in the mainstream today


Completely agreed

They were a hell of a lot better than Pearl Jam, that's for sure.


Disagree, but it's your opinion

SephirothBlade
January 12th 2010



100 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

pfffft.. living ur lives judging peoples music who put the lives into and its not good enough for u...who r u to judge.. naive little people need to see the bigger picture.

UncleSaltyTaterChips
April 28th 2010



82 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The problem most people seem to have with Nirvana is that they've only heard Nevermind, which is their worst album. Bleach has a few blemishes (Big Cheese, Sifting, and Swap Meet) but the rest of the songs are amazing, and In Utero is a masterpiece. You just have to give every album a chance. That philosophy is why I suck at reviewing in most people's eyes - I'm too subjective.

UncleSaltyTaterChips
May 2nd 2010



82 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nothing good about them? Pardon? You don't see ANYTHING good about "Heart-Shaped Box", "Come As You Are", or "Aneurysm"? That's just unfair. So, if you think Nirvana is bad, do you consider torturing puppies when you hear Green Day or Fall Out Boy?

Hey everybody, there's nothing good about the Beatles! Am I not the most insufferably pretentious person you have ever met?

Brylawski
May 2nd 2010



709 Comments


opinions, user TaterChips, opinions

qwe3
May 2nd 2010



21353 Comments


Nirvana generally blows, but In Utero is good

Brylawski
May 2nd 2010



709 Comments


Bleach and In Utero are superior to pretty much anything AIC did, with the exception of Dirt

Romulus
May 2nd 2010



8410 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Nah Dirt and Jar of Flies are way better than anything Nirvana released

UncleSaltyTaterChips
May 2nd 2010



82 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Opinions? Clearly the user I responded to has no sense of subjectivity, considering he states "there was nothing good about [Nirvana]" as if it's a fact.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy