Periphery
Juggernaut: Omega


3.0
good

Review

by Benjamin Kuettel EMERITUS
January 30th, 2015 | 14 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Periphery is as Periphery does.

The rampant controversy surrounding a new Periphery release is inevitable. The group has always been massively talented, if not wholly original. They found a way to combine elements of Meshuggah, Dream Theater, and countless metalcore acts into a melting pot of schizophrenic, high octane progressive metal. A wicked sense of humor pervades every release in the form of an exaggerated self-promotional skit, comical sounding techno sections, and ironic album and song titles. Periphery’s quirks were either charming or unwarranted, depending on whom you asked. They either wanted to take their musical outputs more seriously, or were pressured to pull themselves together as they continued on. Each release toned these qualities down as the compositions and songwriting improved and became more ambitious. Juggernaut marks the first major concept album from the group, split into two 40-minute LPs, Alpha and Omega. The fluidity of the tracks and an abundance of interludes necessitate that the massive Juggernaut must be heard in one sitting.

Tracks bleed into one another on each release, giving the feeling of each half being comprised of a fewer, more massive tracks. Frequent tempo changes and quieter transitions make for an incredibly adventurous listen, especially given their most evolved and mature songwriting yet. However, lush soundscapes and gorgeous atmospherics provide some much-needed variety and appear in some of the LP’s most energetic tracks, found at the end of “The Bad Thing” and throughout the 11-minute epic, “Omega.” Where Omega truly stands out is in its jagged guitar riffs and polyrhythmic drumming. While Alpha boasts a more patient and accessible nature, Omega proves to be a much more exhaustible and dissonant experience. The shorter tracklist and running time gives the darker side of Juggernaut a significantly less overwhelming listen, despite the increased aggression and depth. Spencer Sotelo’s vocals have changed little from Periphery II: This Time It’s Personal. His range and vocal style hasn't changed in any significant way, and previous detractors will find nothing new to like about him on Juggernaut. His whininess and lyrics are cringe inducing at times, particularly in the beginning of “Priestess” and the midsection of album closer “Stranger Things.” Instrumentally, Misha Mansoor and the boys are at the top of their game. Tracks are sure to deliver constant riffing and soloing, fingers dancing across all spans of the fretboard like a spider weaving a web. This is certainly a guitar album, and the equally impressive drumming largely follows whatever monstrous or technical riffs and breakdowns the guitarists bring forth.

For all the impressive and enjoyable musical ideas at play, Periphery’s flaws and compositional flourishes are minimally improved in the songwriting department. These are for the most part encapsulated in Alpha, but still prevent Omega from realizing its full potential. Schizophrenic and bombastic tonal shifts make for a varied and adventurous listen, but far too often are good or interesting ideas short-lived and squandered in favor of another staccato’d breakdown or synth section. A disappointing shortage of individualized standout moments could be disguised as an attempt to create a more fully realized concept album, as opposed to focusing on single hits. Alpha shakily attempted to hold itself together balancing those qualities, while still containing enjoyable individual tracks. Interestingly, the more tormented Omega achieves these qualities relatively successfully. A run of shorter, easily digestible (for Periphery’s standards) songs lead to the 11-minute title track epic, their most overwhelming and adventurous achievement since album closer “Racecar” from Periphery. “Omega” is a veritable cluster*** of guitar riffs, frantic blasts, and screaming, frequently interrupted by synths and quiet instrumental breaks. Despite the overstuffed qualities, it remains the highlight of Juggernaut.

Popularity still rising, this seemed like Periphery’s potential to create something truly incredible. Juggernaut is certainly a name warranted for such a bombastic, overblown record with little in the way of self-awareness or subtlety. Technical riffing, crushing breakdowns, epic sounding choruses, and delicate synth patterns decorate the eighty minute running time. As is the case with their other outputs, a flurry of great ideas sometimes gets lost amidst the constant tempo changes and shifts in tone quality. Guitar leads and memorable riffs too quickly give way to mindless chugging and repetitive grooves that at times feel lifted straight from Periphery I or II. Sotelo hits the notes, but his voice and vocal style too frequently sounds awkward and out of place amidst the sonic variances of blast beats, slamming, and Mansoor’s guitar wizardry and explosions of downtuned riffage. Juggernaut’s large scale concept validates it as a minimal improvement over their trademark sound, marking an equally enjoyable and bafflingly overwhelming experience.



Recent reviews by this author
Mikael Akerfeldt Clark (Soundtrack from the Netflix series)Porcupine Tree Closure/Continuation
Alora Crucible ThymiamatascensionSteven Wilson The Future Bites
Gorillaz Song Machine, Season One: Strange TimezJonsi Shiver
user ratings (1086)
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
ExplosiveOranges (3.5)
The closest thing to a Juggernaut between the two albums....

RivalSkoomaDealer (3)
Peripher3y: Remember Who You Are...

Insurrection (4)
Juggernaut, Pt. 2: Return to roots...

gordodustin (4)
More vocal confidence, heavy and melodic guitars, and more mature subject matter makes this album st...



Comments:Add a Comment 
TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
January 30th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Just wanted to throw in my two cents. This will probably be my main submission for my application for a site promotion, so any constructive criticism is greatly appreciated. All of Juggernaut is streaming on Spotify. Cheers

Gwyn.
January 30th 2015


17270 Comments


prevent Omega from realizing it’s full potential.


Its

and you should probably look for a way to stop making most of your sentences so short

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
January 30th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

That's interesting since I've been trying to avoid doing run-on sentences in my reviews, that's been my biggest problem in writing. I'll proofread again and try to fix them.

Insurrection
January 30th 2015


24844 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

comical techno sections (the intro to “Alpha”)




ben... plz

tempest--
January 30th 2015


20634 Comments


"Juggernaut marks the first major Periphery release with an original title,"

1. what does this have to do with literally anything else?
2. Alpha/Omega is not original at all

BigPleb
January 30th 2015


65784 Comments


Lloyd is pisd.

Not a bad review Talons, but you've done much better.

tempest--
January 30th 2015


20634 Comments


???

BigPleb
January 30th 2015


65784 Comments


Your 2 statements are true tho, lol.

gordodustin
January 30th 2015


525 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

A few disagreements here. Spencer's range shows no improvement on these albums. His highest note remains "Ragnarok" from P:2. Second, Omega is definitely the more intense of the two albums. Alpha is the catchy, hook filled album, Omega is the much heavier, less melodic side of the record.

Sowing
Moderator
January 30th 2015


43943 Comments


First sentence reads a little awkward, but perhaps I'm being picky. "massively talented if not wholly original" - usually if not is used to show contrast, such as "different, if not wholly original." Talent and originality are two separate things, so it ends up meaning, "good, if not wholly different." I'd just save yourself the awkwardness of that phrasing and say "The rampant controversy surrounding a new Periphery release is inevitable, but the group has always been both massively talented and wholly original."

"The group either wanted to take their musical outputs more seriously, or was pressured to pull themselves together as they continued on." Another nitpick, but there's a lack of agreement in this sentence. I go back and forth between referring to bands as an "it" or a "they", but it should be either a singular or plural entity - not both.

The rest of the review is fairly well-written, so I don't know why so many have negged. Any other complaints I might have come down to wording, but to some extent it's based on personal preference. Like the last sentence, "Juggernaut’s massiveness validates it as a minimal improvement over their trademark sound, marking an equally enjoyable and bafflingly overwhelming experience." Like, to translate, it basically says "Juggernaut's large size confirms it as an improvement of their typical sound" which doesn't make a whole lot of sense unless you mean massiveness in terms of its impact, in which case I'd consider re-wording. My advice would just be to try a slightly more casual approach. It doesn't have to be conversational, but sometimes your writing sounds intimidating and at times doesn't support what you're trying to actually say.

Anyway, this is a decent review overall. I like how much depth you went into, it's not "fluffy" aka void of true content. Anyone reading this can tell you know a lot about this band. If you write as passionately about every album you review, then I'm excited to keep following your writing. The reason I went into so much depth (pickiness) is because you're a good writer and I feel like as a staff, we don't often provide as much feedback as we should to help develop promising writers. So anyhow, keep up the good work!






LunaticSoul
January 30th 2015


2398 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I agree with the review as I think most of the stuff you show



"Tracks within each release fade into the other, and the fluidity and abundance of interludes necessitate that the massive Juggernaut must be heard in one sitting.

...

Tracks bleed into one another on each release, giving the feeling of each half being comprised of a fewer, more massive tracks"



did you do this repetition on purpose as a 'pun' or it's just a mistake? (They're back to back end of first paragraph beginning of second)

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
January 30th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks a lot everyone, I proofread again and changed a few things around so it should read better.



Omega is definitely the more intense of the two albums. Alpha is the catchy, hook filled album, Omega is the much heavier, less melodic side of the record.




I really hope you're just stating your opinion here and not correcting me since this is exactly what I'm getting across in the review, I tried to make that part clear.

Ocean of Noise
February 9th 2015


10970 Comments


Well I mean this isn't the absolute best review you've ever done but those 3 negs are not warranted at all

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
February 9th 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Agreed Ocean, though some of those negs might've appeared before I edited.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy