Periphery
Juggernaut: Alpha


2.5
average

Review

by HeavyReviews USER (9 Reviews)
January 23rd, 2015 | 19 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Periphery: Beta

Over the past decade metal has become a place of artistic stagnation, even though many fans may argue that music is creatively infinite, which is a perfectly valid argument to the question: will we ever bore ourselves out of our favorite genre? There are bands who try to respond to this, by trying to overflow their musical pieces with polyrhythms and intricate riffs.

Periphery can now be considered the most commercially successful acts of that "new wave" of prog metal bands, such as Intervals, Animals as Leaders, to name a couple. Although they've been around for at least ten years, they're still initiating their journey through the industry. And, of course, I label it “industry” for a specific reason. It's a verifiable truth that not always the best musical acts get the most praise and recognition. Sometimes, mediocre musicians get spotlight because of their cheesy personalities, overblown guitar skills or even their clean, family friendly demeanor. Unfortunately, in my opinion, it is the case with this North American band.

The music on this release is as robotic as ever, particularly the vocals. Even though they went along pretty well with the music in their previous record, Periphery II, this time along it fails. Sure, there still are some catchy, emotional choruses associated to it, such as in the songs “Alpha” and “ The Bad Thing”, but the rest will not resonate in the listener's ear.

Pop music instrumentals are simple for a reason: so that the vocalist takes the main stand. One cannot sing comfortably over polyrhythms and pretend he is the driving force behind the band, which is exactly what Spencer tries to do. Perhaps his own ego is driving him to completely destroy the creativity of the remaining members, or maybe he is just to naïve to realize what he is doing to the songs.

Unfortunately, this is the problem with this sub-genre – and perhaps many others: in order to achieve commercial success, one has to impose a human voice over the music. I'm sure a lot of the members would agree with this statement. If they want to win the mainstream audience, they have to sing simple melody lines over intricate and nausea inducing riffs.

Another question emerges from all of this: what is good music? This question might seem subjective, but it may not be so. After all, good music evokes an emotional reaction on the listener. Therefore, if the band's sound lacks the human factor, it will most likely fail to touch the listener's emotions. For these specific reason “ Alpha” diverges from the idea of quality music.

Overall, it feels and sounds as if a machine performed the recordings. Let's then pretend that every single person will thoroughly enjoy this release.



Recent reviews by this author
Omnium Gatherum The Burning ColdSwallow the Sun Songs from the North I, II & III
Light the Torch They Bleed Red (as Devil You Know)Soilwork The Ride Majestic
Soilwork Beyond the InfinitePeriphery Clear
user ratings (1080)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Jots
Emeritus
January 23rd 2015


7562 Comments


"Let's then pretend that every single person will thoroughly enjoy this release."
kind of a condescending ending tbh. it's sort of a no-no to anticipate people's (opposite to yours) reaction to an album. make your case and justify your reasons

"Another question emerges from all of this: what is good music? This question might seem subjective, but it may not be so. After all, good music evokes an emotional reaction on the listener. Therefore, if the band's sound lacks the human factor, it will most likely fail to touch the listener's emotions. For these specific reason “ Alpha” diverges from the idea of quality music."
unnecessary paragraph. you could simply say the album fails to connect on an emotional level and make that a separate point. this paragraph comes off as really pretentious. you could reword it a bit and say "listeners reliant on emotional connectivity will find this album lacking" and you'd be fine IMO

Jots
Emeritus
January 23rd 2015


7562 Comments


aside from that I think this is a nice, to the point review. I think you make a couple unnecessary sidesteps that shouldn't be
grounds for judging this album, but w/e that might just be me

Nocturnalize
January 23rd 2015


2463 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I pos'd for dat summary

KILL
January 23rd 2015


81580 Comments


beta is a progression over alpha tho

Psynuts
January 23rd 2015


373 Comments


Was thinking the same thing

HeavyReviews
January 23rd 2015


60 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

johnny on the spot. Yes, perhaps my scientific approach to the question made it sound pretentious.

Jots
Emeritus
January 23rd 2015


7562 Comments


"my scientific approach" well idk about that, but you say "some people say good music is subjective... but nevermind that, it's ____" which is sort of an unnecessary angle to take, and more likely to disgruntle readers

HeavyReviews
January 23rd 2015


60 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

johnnynotonthespot with what I intended.

Jots
Emeritus
January 23rd 2015


7562 Comments


just offering some honest criticism, not trying to bash your review.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 23rd 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I think that paragraph about "what is good music" is really useless.

Diglett
January 23rd 2015


1607 Comments


your criticisms could fit in a soundoff, even a comment

Tunaboy45
January 23rd 2015


18421 Comments


Not going to vote but you need to talk about the album a bit more

paradox1216
January 27th 2015


730 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

kill, what the fuck happened to your absolutely perfect Periphery II review



and why haven't you done one for this yet

paradox1216
January 27th 2015


730 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I don't understand why you can't have pop singing over complex instrumentals. You never explain why that doesn't work; in fact, you don't explain ANYTHING here. It's all just presumptions.



"intricate and nausea-inducing riffs" - are we saying that complicated is bad? is nausea-inducing good? you never explain



Fuck you for suggesting that the idea of good music isn't subjective. that is the most presumptuous shitty thing to say ever and I've lost all respect for you for saying it.



Neg'd very hard

HeavyReviews
January 29th 2015


60 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

You neg'd because you gave a five. This is hardly a 5, you are a fanboy

Jots
Emeritus
January 29th 2015


7562 Comments


he neg'd you for saying what I pointed out in my earlier criticism. tried to warn you
(I didn't neg btw)

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 29th 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm sure people neg'd because they thought your review sucked. Might wanna learn to deal with that instead of insulting people.

Diglett
January 29th 2015


1607 Comments


'You neg'd because you gave a five BAWWWWWW :^('
no, he and everyone else negd because its a poor review

Solbrave
January 29th 2015


574 Comments


"After all, good music evokes an emotional reaction on the listener."

says who? you?

"Therefore, if the band's sound lacks the human factor, it will most likely fail to touch the listener's emotions. For these specific reason “ Alpha” diverges from the idea of quality music."

justify that besides just saying "it's robotic" earlier in the review.

you spend way too much time trying to position your personal view of what makes good music instead of actually talking about the music. If you're going to predicate your argument about an album's value on your own definition of what does or does not make good music, the least you can do is justify your assessment against that same definition. "The riffs are technical, but lack punch, and don't grab the listener," for example. "Spencer's vocals soar, far removed from the instrumentals, and there is little connection."

paradox's comment is literally full of spot-on criticisms, and the only reason you dismissed them off-hand is by looking at his rating for the album instead of what he actually said.

Also, there's a good number of grammar errors that are only worth addressing once the review is actually a review.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy