Judas Priest
Redeemer of Souls


2.5
average

Review

by Xenorazr USER (120 Reviews)
July 9th, 2014 | 12 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Once again, the Priest is back. And they're not getting any younger.

If by show of hands a group of Judas Priest fans were asked whether or not they enjoyed the 2008 beast that was Nostradamus, chances are few would exert and none would be quick about it. In the six years since, Priest have mostly stuck to live shows and relatively minor releases. Then, as if out of a long extinguished fire pit, the band announced the completion of their 17th studio album, Redeemer of Souls. Based on the initial batch of tracks, it seemed they were ready to return to what made them popular in the first place, with a more straightforward heavy metal sound. All that was left to discover was whether it would be good enough.

Opener "Dragonaut," pleasantly distorted and riff-friendly, alongside the comparatively lax title track, are together indicative of the entire album. This is fundamentally the traditional Priest formula fans were expecting after Angel of Retribution; basic song structure, notable intros, laughable lyrics, etc. Over the course of thirteen tracks, each about four to five minutes long, we hear the band pace and infrequently stride. Redeemer of Souls is usually at its best when the hits are at their heaviest (see the aforementioned "Dragonaut" and "Sword of Damocles"), though the more comfortably steady moments seem intended to fill the album's hour-long runtime, which can soon feel wearisome. A key reason why is that throughout this lengthy course, Redeemer of Souls seldom captivates.

Keep in mind these Brits have been releasing material and putting on shows for 40 years (Rocka Rolla does count), so the fact we're getting an album that doesn't completely hold back could almost be called admirable. If nothing else, each track on Redeemer of Souls has a definitive Priest vibe that makes the entire album listenable, and miles more approachable than Nostradamus.

All that being said and considered, there's still the question of how the album stands on its own merits. The simple answer is that it does stand, just not tall or stoutly. Even when taking the best individual tracks into account, Redeemer of Souls falls short of the band's established pedigree. Most of the ear-pleasing moments are short segments that are seldom followed through. Compelling? Hardly so. Competent? Maybe. Ultimately the most reassuring case one could make for Redeemer of Souls is that it's a far more proper swan song than Nostradamus could have been. That is, assuming this is their final studio album.



Recent reviews by this author
Dream Theater Distance Over TimeAvantasia Moonglow
Swallow the Sun When a Shadow Is Forced into the LightSeventh Wonder Tiara
Shylmagoghnar TransienceAmorphis Queen of Time
user ratings (596)
3.2
good
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • Jordan M. EMERITUS (3)
    "...feel as though nobody cares, if we live or die..."...

    ExplosiveOranges (3)
    Priest delivers a mixed bag that nonetheless stands out on its own when compared to other ...

    MetalMeltdown (4)
    Steadfast, strong that's for sure!...

    kvltwalter (3.5)
    Priest return from rock opera territory with a largely by-the-numbers release. Unfortunate...

  • Friday13th (2.5)
    No amount of heavy riffs can redeem the soul of this recycled mess....

    PsychicChris (4)
    Redeemer of Souls is a respectable outing if this does turn out to be Priest's last effort...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Xenorazr
July 9th 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Been a while. My old, inner fanboy couldn't resist listening to and writing a review for this.

MO
July 9th 2014


24016 Comments


"so the fact we're getting an album that doesn't completely hold back could almost be called admirable"

more like IS admirable

trackbytrackreviews
July 9th 2014


3469 Comments


Reads more like a 3

Xenorazr
July 9th 2014


1466 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

I almost gave it a 3, but I knocked it down because the album feels too long and uninteresting. Somewhere between tracks 6 and 10 I lose interest and everything begins to blend together.

betray
July 9th 2014


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I almost gave it a 3, but I knocked it down because the album feels too long and uninteresting [2]

BMDrummer
July 9th 2014


15096 Comments


Alright record

Voivod
Staff Reviewer
July 9th 2014


10702 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Band sounds tired - save for the new guitarist, everyone else in the band is way past its prime - and it's completely understandable, but the album is still a 3+/5.



The lead guitar work is absolutely fantastic.

facupm
July 9th 2014


11850 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"average" suits this so much

Necrotica
July 9th 2014


10693 Comments

Album Rating: 2.2 | Sound Off

Great review, and such a mediocre album.



KK's probably pretty glad that he's not on this thing

trackbytrackreviews
July 9th 2014


3469 Comments


'cause being in Nostradamus is so much better

facupm
July 9th 2014


11850 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

nostradamus is better imo

trackbytrackreviews
July 9th 2014


3469 Comments


Opinions... but no, I find Nostradamus to be worse



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy