The Dillinger Escape Plan One of Us Is the Killer
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
tempest--
February 3rd 2015


20634 Comments


i wasnt talking about time sigs bro

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

that's odd, considering "classic spazzy Dillinger" is based on weird time signatures. did you mean polyrhythmic exploration? because that's also not too interesting here. this is easily dillinger's least technical album, and for a technical metal band that translates directly to their worst album.

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

bro

Avagantamos
February 3rd 2015


8895 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

stokin' the furnace

iamamanfromspace
February 3rd 2015


1030 Comments


To be honest it's not like it's impossible for them to make a not very technical but still great album, but this isn't it

YetAnotherBrick
February 3rd 2015


6693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"it might sound spazzy but it mostly ends up as 4/4."



um who cares. still sounds like raw spazzy awesome Dillinger to me. why would you actually only listen to music like this if it actually changes time signatures all the time? that seems kind of shallow and pointless

Avagantamos
February 3rd 2015


8895 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

beyond the technicality, this still isn't as good as previous works

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this is a technical metal band. their gimmick is that they are technical in a rhythmic manner. they have built a career upon making rhythmically technical songs.



on this album, they moved away from this, and the end result was negative. many groups can make drastic changes to their sound and attain a positive result. this is not one of those cases.

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"still sounds like raw spazzy awesome Dillinger to me. why would you actually only listen to music like this if it actually changes time signatures all the time? that seems kind of shallow and pointless"



tbh half the fun of listening to dillinger tracks is figuring out the time sigs and how it all works. this album in the context of their career is like doing 1000 piece where's waldo jigsaws and then being handed this: http://i01.i.aliimg.com/wsphoto/v1/1515438965_1/Fashion-Wooden-Rabbit-font-b-Puzzle-b-font-Educational-Developmental-Baby-Kids-Training-Toy-Freeshipping-wholesale.jpg

YetAnotherBrick
February 3rd 2015


6693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"this is a technical metal band. their gimmick is that they are technical in a rhythmic manner."



this is not just a "technical metal" band, this is a band that transcends pointless genre restrictions like that one. if their "gimmick" has to be restricted to "technical in a rhythmic manner," how do you explain Unretrofied, Black Bubblegum, Milk Lizard, Gold Teeth On A Bum, Parasitic Twins, Nothing's Funny, etc.? They're a band that does whatever the hell they want, no matter the genre, or "gimmick," as you call it. And that's why they're so awesome.

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i'll cede that i am bad at communication though. iamamanfromspace summed it up pretty well:

To be honest it's not like it's impossible for them to make a not very technical but still great album, but this isn't it


YetAnotherBrick
February 3rd 2015


6693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"tbh half the fun of listening to dillinger tracks is figuring out the time sigs and how it all works."



lol they're one of my favorite bands and i've never done that. and i really don't think the band wants me to. they use very calculated song structures to articulate very visceral and un-calculated emotions. it's a beautiful contradiction.

danielito19
February 3rd 2015


12251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i mean my gripe with the album isn't just that it isn't technical; it's that it's boring as shit, and dangerously close to your typical Sumerian-core. I would have no problem with a non-technical dillinger album, but they have proven here that they don't know how to write good non-technical music.

Butkuiss
February 3rd 2015


6942 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yah it's snoozers.

Flugmorph
February 3rd 2015


33993 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

brick is right. you gimmicky haters can leave

iamamanfromspace
February 3rd 2015


1030 Comments


Sorry for not loving the album, I'll try harder next time

Flugmorph
February 3rd 2015


33993 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

its ok. you can have a cookie regardless

iamamanfromspace
February 3rd 2015


1030 Comments


Just cleaned my teeth :

thacoconut94
February 3rd 2015


1497 Comments


Literally never even heard a second of this bands music but have heard very good things

iamamanfromspace
February 3rd 2015


1030 Comments


They're good as heck



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy