riffoclock s so write guys
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
2.5? where's your morals???
Digging: Death in June - The Guilty Have No Pride |
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
the parts as wholes don’t come together to form anything atmospheric
punk... atmospheric
The guitar leads provide the most interesting aspects but they mostly want to do their own thing
guitar LEADS doing their own thing OH SHIT
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Lol riff
Digging: Carla Kihlstedt & Matthias Bossi - Rabbit Rabbit Radio - Vol. 1 |
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Yeah seriously, some people like this more than you do I'm affraid....
I wasn't talking about the album
Digging: Still Corners - Strange Pleasures |
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i dont hear enough mouth of the architect in here sorry guys 2/5
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Successful trolling by yankee
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Your definition of success is weird
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
All your system means is you start from 1.5 and stretch your average albums and above out from there. Cutting out all the albums you dont like. Which means a 2.5 is a great album to you, but this doesnt read that way. Just sounds like a normal 2.5. Not hard to figure out that you're confused.
2.5 is never a great album. It means it has some good stuff and it was worth the listen but overall it falls short. Just cos most albums are like that and many are worse doesn't mean the ratings should be inflated.
|
| |
anarchistfish are we friends on facebook
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
no
|
| |
okay good just checking
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
might I ask why you ask
?
|
| |
Nope.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
ok
|
| |
Hey Batman, what killed the dinosaurs?
The band that did You're Nothing I Believe
oh yeah
Digging: The World is a Beautiful Place And... - Whenever, If Ever
|
| |
"2.5 is never a great album. It means it has some good stuff and it was worth the listen but overall it falls short."
We went over this thats how most people rate 2.5s. But you supposedly rate different and only rate albums you like/think are above average. So a 2.5 on your scale is at least a 3.5 on sputnik's. Which your review does not read as. Keep ignoring this main point though.
"Just cos most albums are like that and many are worse doesn't mean the ratings should be inflated."
Fish its not my problem you cant find good albums. Most albums are in the middle yea but thats why we have music sites to sift through all the bad and meh to get to the good shit. Thats what we end up listening to and rating most of the time. If you really think only 3 albums deserve a 5, one of which is Slipknot, then you are music-ing very very wrong.
Digging: Klaus Nomi - Klaus Nomi
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
might I ask why you ask
?
Nope.
+1.4
|
| |
i dont understand why people treat 5's like the holy grail. if you love an album a lot why not 5 it
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Again I ask you if you actually know what average means. I rate all albums I listen to. It just doesn't make sense to actively dislike music as often as most people here seem to make out. 1.5 just means there's nothing about it I like, even if there's nothing that actively puts me off. So anything higher than that means there's something noteworthy, but that doesn't make the whole album good.
|
| |
|
|
