Architects Daybreaker
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
sspedding
April 25th 2013


4794 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

uninspired largely.

NorwichScene
April 26th 2013


1525 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Average album. Band could do so much better

MarkTheDead
April 29th 2013


665 Comments


I think they can do better, but I was far from disappointed by this.

Spec
May 3rd 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Tried too hard on the lyrics.

XingKing
May 3rd 2013


11078 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

The lyrics are horrendously bad on this release, especially when they try to talk about politics

Spec
May 3rd 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I liked the personal ones he used to write.

amemento
May 4th 2013


1425 Comments


arhciexs

wacknizzle
May 4th 2013


13704 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, Spec. The lyrics on HC were so much more personal and meaningful. But I never really looked for that from this band, I just want sick riffs. Just remember the good times not the bad, okay buddy.

Digging: Phobocosm - Deprived

ChuckyTruant
May 4th 2013


15725 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

those are good too

TomArnoldsArmpit
May 5th 2013


3035 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I don't believe I've dropped a burrito in quite some years, my good fellows

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Now that they're decently successful they have no pain to inspire them anymore!

XingKing
May 17th 2013


11078 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Touring is hard though :[ wah

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Cracks In The Earth was a good b-side. I want to like this so bad but I can't ugh.

wacknizzle
May 17th 2013


13704 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

not enuff heavy

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

None of the heavy on the album is very good. The melodic parts stand out more I'd say. Just cause his harsh vocals suck now.

wacknizzle
May 17th 2013


13704 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah they're not quite what they used to be. And I wish there more dissonance like on HC and Nightmares, that's what made their riffs so heavy.

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yes! I agree 110%. That's what always stood out about the guitar work for me. They've got a very talented drummer, a competent vocalist (when he wants to be). This is unacceptable.

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

*junacceptable

wacknizzle
May 17th 2013


13704 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

There's a few sweet really heavy parts but alot of it feels like forced backwash. They just need to get good at being all out heavy again, it's like they don't even want to be a metal band anymore so they can be popular. And they're like shooting a fan funded documentary now, fuck off Architects you aren't even what you used to be.

Spec
May 17th 2013


27298 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yeah the DVD is a slap in the face. They're fucking lost and should figure out their own shit not waste people's time and money making a DVD!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy