Art By Numbers Reticence: The Musical
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
ThunderNeutral21
May 25th 2012


3864 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

sucks

Motiv3
May 26th 2012


8938 Comments


Haven't been impressed with what ive heard so far. Will check out though.

SmokingTheClouds
May 26th 2012


639 Comments


Album isn't all too bad. But, it's nothing jaw-droping either. The vocalist that filled in for The Human Abstract, after Travis left. HIS band is rather breathtaking. Corelia.

Scoot
May 27th 2012


17779 Comments


does this suck

MichaelSnoxall
May 28th 2012


12163 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

Yes, this sucks.

Wolfhorde
May 28th 2012


13628 Comments


Lots of wank.

Philalethes
May 28th 2012


245 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

5 reviews up for this "Progressive Metal Masterpiece". 4/5 of the reviewers created a new account in May, and the 5th created their account in April. Each of the accounts show their last active date as the day after it was created. It seems as if its working though, because they did get their album streamed on Sputnik and now a review featured on the front page. Kudos to whoever is promoting this band.

Klekticist
May 28th 2012


1259 Comments


Penultimate paragraph is a single sentence BTW.

zaruyache
May 28th 2012


6605 Comments


This site seems to be getting a lot of noticeable trolling lately.

Digging: Natural Snow Buildings - The Night Country

NonApplicable
May 28th 2012


1963 Comments


Vocals are so... (insert homophobic comment here)

Azn.
May 28th 2012


5612 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The few screams that are there bother me. But otherwise it's pretty catchy to me. Guitar work is kinda gimicky but whatever DAT PIANO.

macadoolahicky
May 28th 2012


1835 Comments


Phcusf claims he likes the vocals and the piano, and gives it a 5.

PuddlesPuddles
May 29th 2012


4773 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

As much as I love music and wish success on those genuine, I've never wanted an album to break below a 4 so badly. It's just... It's not accurate

PuddlesPuddles
May 29th 2012


4773 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

The rating police don't look in this thread anyways


But naw, I wouldn't do that. My rating is actually inflated for not being folk or chillwave. Band
might surprise me with something truly unique and interesting in the future. If they open up them
hearts.

But this... well remember in Hercules when he had to dive into the River Styx and he was
growing old and wrinkly?


They should've referenced that somewhere, I felt.

theat001
May 29th 2012


86 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The only thing this band needs to do to really impress me is sweep less (more diverse techniques in their solos), extend some of the interesting parts (maybe adding more transitions in doing so) and just incorporate more of their diverse influences.

ThunderNeutral21
May 29th 2012


3864 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

or maybe not sucking and being good would help them

Recspecs
May 29th 2012


9829 Comments


Craig do you like anything?

ThunderNeutral21
May 29th 2012


3864 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i hate music so no

Killerhit
May 30th 2012


5250 Comments


That's a snide remark.

But that channel needs to die.

PuddlesPuddles
May 30th 2012


4773 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I will give it to Powell at managing, he knows how to push things. Unfortunately I see a very annoying future for this band



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy