if wikipedia use this site in their reception sections I really think they should stop using reviews and use the average score. if at all

That was one of the worst covers of Rebel Yell I have heard

lol

"excellent" just lost its meaning

Most creative band around

if wikipedia use this site in their reception sections I really think they should stop using reviews and use the average score. if at all

That's why I added a {{citation needed}} tag on that page :-P

you are only supposed to quote staff or contributors on wikipedia
fucking duh

this band is gay, but the review wasnt terrible

A lot of highly rated user reviews lately...

This one sucked, I'm sorry. Not sound like that guy who (poorly) promotes eHarmony in that one commercial, but I sincerely mean it. Neg'd.

"The song is easily perhaps the best song on this EP and I love it!!!"

really?

"this band is gay, but the review wasnt terrible"

you've got to be kidding

^i can smell what your cooking

you're*

grow some taste and then comeback to this site. or you can just finish cutting yourself leave us alone

Grow some taste?
Maybe you should both fuck off.

Band is laughable, review is similar.

aphro lays the (grammatical) smacketh down all over your candy asses

This band.

"you are only supposed to quote staff or contributors on wikipedia"

Yeah I remember Jom saying something about that it took a LONG time to develop a relationship with Wikipedia, so that sputnik could be used as a reliable reviewing source.

I thought you could just go to a band and add a review. I've done a few times, they were never really altered (although I did always went for Staff/Contributor reviews).