Foxy Shazam The Church of Rock and Roll
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Antipunk
January 24th 2012


324 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this shit is fun as hell.

Tom93M
January 24th 2012


1106 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Hate the vocals...

clercqie
January 24th 2012


6515 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

C'mon Tom, this stuff is hilarious as hell.

Tom93M
January 24th 2012


1106 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm really not enjoying this. I can see why people like it cos its quite fun but i just can't dig it for some reason.

Spec
January 24th 2012


28633 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Love the vocals.

Zorak
January 24th 2012


3191 Comments


Nally is awesome. He has a mustache

Athom
Emeritus
January 24th 2012


17240 Comments


Butt pirates

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


lol have u even heard camelectric six

Athom
Emeritus
January 24th 2012


17240 Comments


No it does not. Their first two albums were good. These latest two have just been annoyingly bad. Bands need to realize that pretending to be queen doesnt make them interesting.

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


Bands need to realize that pretending to be queen doesnt make them interesting.


unless you're my chemical romance cuz they did it so well

Athom
Emeritus
January 24th 2012


17240 Comments


they weren't really post-hardcore to begin with. they used to be weird and that's all they really had going for them. plus me liking them was having introducing at a 3.5

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


pretty generic tbh

Aphrodisiac
January 24th 2012


1739 Comments


not a 5 but cmon the flamboyance udhfkvsjdhf

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


frankly there is too much wank

what is this a btbam album?

Aphrodisiac
January 24th 2012


1739 Comments


the horn solos on this are legit

Spec
January 24th 2012


28633 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Foxy Shazam and BTBAM comparasin. Who woulda thought?

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


sorry you guyz there is just too much wank terrible songwriting and recycled ideas to bring this above a 3.288884/5

TomAkaVeto
January 24th 2012


1746 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

How can anyone dislike this? I think they can pull off the Queen style tastefully. It's not like they're ripping off Queen, it's more of an ode to Queen. On Muse's lastest, they tried to add in a little of the Queen style and it was God-awful. That's not the case here, in my opinion.

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
January 24th 2012


29121 Comments


in other news i actually like this album

Spec
January 24th 2012


28633 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Queen meets the Sex Pistols.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy