Album Rating: 4.0
I'm just gonna keep laughing dude.
What's pathetic is when you low rate albums of bands you already didn't really like to begin with.
All the drivel on your list is pretty crappy, but I wont go out of my way to listen to something I already know that I'm probably not gonna like.
Why did you even bother with the new Mastodon record? It's clear you like glam hair/eyeliner bands, pop and mainstream rock... Stick to it man.
And insults aren't the way to go, I didn't attack your person for that music, just thought it was funny. I don't hate on people for liking shitty music, just the actual music itself.
Cheers.
|
Album Rating: 3.5
"Why did you even bother with the new Mastodon record? It's clear you like glam hair/eyeliner bands, pop and mainstream rock... Stick to it man."
um I gave Crack The Skye a 3.5
"And insults aren't the way to go, I didn't attack your person for that music, just thought it was funny. I don't hate on people for liking shitty music, just the actual music itself."
wow. firstly, I wasn't talking to you and secondly, you're using technicalities to make out that I'm the nasty one here.
"I didn't attack your person for that music". seriously? that's what you come up with? because you didn't say "fuck you" directly? no, you're right, what you said wasn't really insulting but judging by how eager you were to jump into an argument it's pretty obvious you're trolling
"It's clear you like glam hair/eyeliner bands, pop and mainstream rock..."
lol now you're just being an idiot
and "pathetic" isn't an insult
|
Album Rating: 5.0
Nice review my friend. Personally I disagree with the idea that 13 minute epics are what we've "come to expect of the band" because I can only think of three such songs. It is definitely something that was characteristic of Crack The Skye, as well as Leviathan in the instance of one song, but for the most part these songs are the same length as those on Blood Mountain and Leviathan.
|
