Emperor Wrath of the Tyrant
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Cravinov13
July 29th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Arch Enemy have some good songs but overall lack any real originality.

Besides, THE F**KIN BASHED MIKE PATTON!

LifeInABox
July 29th 2007


3708 Comments


They did? Who's Mike Patton?

Dulcinea
July 29th 2007


181 Comments


you can't be serious

Cravinov13
July 29th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Mike Patton is the god of all that's holy. he is the amazin talent behind Mr. Bungle, Faith No More, Fantomas, Tomahawk and many many others. he is the most original musician and one of the most talented in existence. his greatness is not to be questioned.

LifeInABox
July 29th 2007


3708 Comments


Ahhhhhh, yes, yes, yes. Mr.Bungle fame. AE made fun of him? They have no business doing that, those faggots.

Cravinov13
July 29th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

exactly

KingGhidorah
July 29th 2007


64 Comments


when/where did they do this?

Cravinov13
July 29th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

in Revolver magazine over 1 year agoThis Message Edited On 07.29.07

Angmar
July 29th 2007


2689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The new album cover for this is badass

LifeInABox
July 30th 2007


3708 Comments


I like the old one better tbh.

Hawks
March 12th 2008


35824 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Emperor's early material is amazing.

Digging: Engraved - Before The Tales

wexenhex
January 19th 2009


192 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

HEY, i enjoy Arch Enemy quite abit. you must not realize how great they are live...
Mike Patton is a genius, yes, but they certainly entitled to strange opinions...

Hawks
January 19th 2009


35824 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Dude you're like two years late on that one.

wexenhex
January 23rd 2009


192 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Nah, this review was two years too soon.This Message Edited On 01.23.09

oalston
October 4th 2009


91 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This album is good but the production really does compromise the quality of the album as a whole. I really like black metal which has an underproduced feel but the production on this album is so bad that it takes away from the album. The vocals in particular drown out everything else at times, which is not like Emperor in their later releases. If the production was better, this album would probably be about a 4, but as it is I give it 6.5/10

Hawks
October 4th 2009


35824 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I really don't think the production takes anything away from this. Yes it's really bad, but this is still amazing.

heavykevlarsuit
October 4th 2009


151 Comments


Yeah let's revive an ancient thread. Anyway I actually have heard this, and for what it is it does its job.

oalston
October 5th 2009


91 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I think Emperor were already a very interesting band from their first demo but the production reached a point where it compromises the songs, although there are times when the production isn't too bad but at other times everything is drowned out by the vocals. The production on the Emperor EP is about as underproduced as black metal can get before it sounds bad. I really like the production on 'In The Nightside Eclipse'. It owns!

supertouchox2
January 3rd 2010


1062 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

i still prefer the sound of anthems, nightside still sounds awesome to.

MoosechriS
April 12th 2010


5008 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This slays FACT! and i won't hear a bad word said against it.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy