if an album is better you will like it more likE HOW ELSE COULD IT WORK
if you dont like an album as much it is worse as well
i mean whats with this silly backwards logic like "i dont like this as much but it's "better"" i mean
what
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i actually entered on the second page of arguing you fucking moronic dipshit. it's really fucking stupid you saying that I'm spewing nonsense, when you are the first one who took a miniscule comment to such a ridiculous level. my comments were short and clear as fuc.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
are all of your 5's the best albums you can possibly think of, or are some of them nostalgiac or emotionally connected to you making them 5's?
Digging: Chance The Rapper - Acid Rap |
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
double post
|
| |
watch the language
|
| |
Are you on crack? That's not at all what I said, I acknowledge that particular albums are more well made and musically proficient, but that other albums' sentiments hit home a lot harder.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
in other news..
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gyro: no apparently there is no difference between musicality and personal favorites
|
| |
lol, apparently
|
| |
yeah but all these "objective" qualities like being "well made" and "musically proficient" dont matter if they dont make you like it more than the album that may not have those qualities
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
yeah guys this has been beaten to death. moving on
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"dont matter" just because you don't value them as mattering, doesn't mean they do not exist
rom: boredom my friend. stuck inside due to a storm.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
see we were all discussing and arguing and stuff and robertsona just comes out of nowhere spewing
nonsense and now it's like whats going on
fixd
/thread
|
| |
yeah but all these "objective" qualities like being "well made" and "musically proficient" dont matter if they dont make you like it more than the album that may not have those qualities
my perspective of you has become tainted
|
| |
im not saying they dont exist, what, what are you talking about
im saying you can objectively qualify music's (qualities): the beatles' rubber soul was innovative,
the harmonies and singing are great, the playing is generally great, whatever--most people would
agree that this makes the album good simply because most people agree that these qualities make a
good album
but if someone doesnt like the album it's not like theyre wrong because it has those qualities thus
it MUST be good--those qualities, though THEY THEMSELVES may be objective, do not make an album
objectively good
edit: fixed something
edit2: i just raelized this post has a lot of mistakes whatever
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
again that is not what chambered was saying. by best he was implying that they are composed of more musical components, however, his favorite denotes that musical value doesn't mean it will hit home.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Well that killed any chance we had of having a conversation that isn't retarded
|
| |
i just got sort of tired of this whatever im just gonna keep saying the same things over and over
|
| |
"Well that killed any chance we had of having a conversation that isn't retarded"
you guys have used this copout like five fucking times in the last three pages shut up
edit: oh i just saw that that was a repost okay
|
| |
lol robertsona... you lose
|
| |
|
|
