Six Feet Under Graveyard Classics III
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TheSpirit
Emeritus
January 30th 2010


30304 Comments


He sounds like a fucking ent.

ADVENTURE
February 11th 2010


7 Comments


how does anyone get into this vocalist?

Dryden
February 11th 2010


13585 Comments


they don't

NeutralThunder12
March 3rd 2010


8742 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

It sucks, but it's better than their original material. Vocals are awful but the solos were decent. But this is still pathetic.

Mags172
March 3rd 2010


127 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't think it's worse than their original material, because some of their own songs are pretty decent, from what one of my friends showed me. He's a really big SFU fan and loves all of their songs, I just don't see what's so special about them. The thing is, if Chris Barnes wasn't the vocalist and it was some guy off the street, this band would be nowhere.

anuspudding
August 3rd 2010


403 Comments


has he ever once in his career listened to his albums and hear how ridiculously stupid his high screams sound?

cameraeye
June 3rd 2012


41 Comments


Christ this was a god awful album.

CrimsonFireCF
November 7th 2012


109 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

SFU covering Anvil....LOLS!

Fozzie
October 19th 2013


506 Comments


Because his vocals were so low in the mix.

You are clueless. Barnes was one of the top Death Metal vocalists at that time. It's obvious you have never seen Cannibal Corpse live with Barnes. His voice was great until 1997.

Now for this album, it blows.

Sabrutin
April 13th 2016


9646 Comments


Heard you guys wanted a new one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-qd_fm7Pco



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy