Paramore Brand New Eyes
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
KILL
September 22nd 2009


77191 Comments


needs more gore

ninjuice
September 22nd 2009


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I don't think the terms "mediocrity" and "crap-o-rama" are interchangeable.


Yeah it's a 2.5 vs a 1.5.

Now they've just got to live up to it and create the classic album the fans know they can make.


First they have to have a big enough dispute with Fueled By Ramen to leave the label.

mynameischan
Emeritus
September 22nd 2009


17960 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

ya 320kbp leaked today

charlesfishowitz
September 22nd 2009


1794 Comments


wat

ninjuice
September 22nd 2009


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Kilobytes Per Second = higher sound quality.

charlesfishowitz
September 22nd 2009


1794 Comments


thanks ninjew









you fucking faggot

cirq
September 22nd 2009


9334 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

paramore>flyleaf

this album is really good!

cirq
September 22nd 2009


9334 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i like hayley more than lacey

Against Miik!
September 22nd 2009


215 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Well the first time through I was like wtf is this shit. Just 3 or 4 listens later and this rivals Riot!. Riot! had 5 or 6 good tracks, this has 9 or 10. It's better the whole way through.



I was looking for a little more from the band. There a few moments where they shine, but unlike No Doubt (a comparable case), they seem replaceable. However I hope they all stick together because while not spectacular, they are really tight, and it wouldn't be Paramore without the three of them (plus Taylor I guess).



And I hate Flyleaf. Paramore is really the only band of this style that I enjoy.

KILL
September 22nd 2009


77191 Comments


when will paramore be totally like 5 minutes ago?

Against Miik!
September 22nd 2009


215 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Both female fronted pop rock. The only difference is Flyleaf is more on the rock side and Paramore more on the pop.

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
September 22nd 2009


29555 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

theyre not even close stylistically...



flyleaf is less good tho but not by that much

theacademy
Staff Reviewer
September 22nd 2009


29555 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

also, lacey and hayley are both sexxified

mynameischan
Emeritus
September 22nd 2009


17960 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

flyleaf are horrible

cirq
September 22nd 2009


9334 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

no, theyre good

KILL
September 22nd 2009


77191 Comments


fffffffffuck you

Against Miik!
September 22nd 2009


215 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Btw where did this get officially released that allows it to be reviewed?

mynameischan
Emeritus
September 22nd 2009


17960 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nowhere

cirq
September 22nd 2009


9334 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

staff reviewers can review unreleased albums i guess

Against Miik!
September 22nd 2009


215 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Yeah I was gonna say, unless you guys receive it form a legitimate source, that seems a bit dubious.



But glad thats not not the case.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2016 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy