Album Rating: 3.0
I am getting rather sick of the term "having balls". What, you wrote a negative review for an album you didn't like? It would just be called a negative review if it's of an album that is received that way, but if the album is somewhat appreciated you suddenly get praised for "having balls". It's just kind of stupid.
Copy and paste time.
Even if this was a well thought out and detailed review it would probably still get neg'd cause it Kattun + Circle/Square.
I guess you're just too new to understand that the majority of Sputnik user's wouldn't give a bad review rating to a prized album.
But bringon, you have no excuse, expect for that you're an idiot?This Message Edited On 09.06.08
|
| |
I guess you're just too new to understand that the majority of Sputnik user's wouldn't give a bad review rating to a prized album.
so? Even if kattun had "supposed" balls that you claimed he had, he drop the ball (no pun intended), as the review is bad. The reasoning is decent, but he tries way to hard to be funny. At least AtavanHalen's review of this was actually half-decent.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
[quote=bastard]so? Even if kattun had "supposed" balls that you claimed he had, he drop the ball (no pun intended), as the review is bad. The reasoning is decent, but he tries way to hard to be funny. At least AtavanHalen's review of this was actually half-decent.[/quote]
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=puns
|
| |
nice rant.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
tl;dr
|
| |
The phrase "no pun intended" makes me want to band saw my dick off just in case I'm the last man alive and I have to risk repopulating Earth with some moron's incapable vagina.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
stupid
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
The Best Page in the Universe sucks.
|
| |
Pretty much.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i think the real truth s you guys suck..amirite?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
this really isnt bad enough to deserve a 10 percent approval, ive read much worse.... this is just bias against kattun methinks
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
werd at least he's not a bitch like some and got it removed or called it a joke review...This Message Edited On 09.06.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
probably but i dont care
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
at least he's not a bitch like some and got it removed
It's being rewritten, genius.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Methinks it will still have an approval rating about as low as the president no matter how well written it is...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
completely agree and atvanhalen you submitted your review so you musta thought it was good enough...have some balls take your lumps and learn...instead you go the vagina mcginestein way and have it removed...kattun, however posted his feelings and edited the grammar mistakes but left it there, and it's not poorly written nor is it the best writing ever...to have this many negs it's just hate on the kid who likes that overly flamboyant band and makes sometimes lame jokes
...and the best page in the universe is awesome so you lose agAin
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
amen
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Iluvatar this is an unliked members of sputnik thread...you are way too cool for school gtfo
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Actually it is poorly written, something can be perfect grammar wise and still be poorly written. Its poorly written because he didn't bother to actually research a genre he wasn't familiar with before writing about it. Just because you don't get something doesn't mean its bad. I don't get Picasso most of the time, but I respect his work for what it is. Get what I'm saying?
Also, I'm sick of seeing phrases involving the word balls...
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yea no, i didnt pos this, nor will i, but 3 pos's and 27 neg's is still a bit harsh, aight peace
|
| |
|
|
