Great review...
I really need to get one of this a.s.a.p
|
| |
gaha i wrote this so long ago. it's really painful for me to read.
|
| |
I think I might pick this up.
|
| |
could someone hook some songs to me?This Message Edited On 04.16.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
if you have iTunes I can send you the CD in that format.
|
| |
IsItLuck do you have Soulseek?
Best emo album of all time btw.
EDIT: 711TH POSTThis Message Edited On 04.16.07
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
No I do not.
OMG 711
|
| |
damn.... ah well, never mind. at least i'm downloading it right now. :p
|
| |
I'm listening now
It's good
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
[quote=lulu]Have fun being dissapointed in another dozen bands if you think this is too samey at all.[/quote]
I think this is really samey, and I'm pretty content with the amount of emo I have that isn't samey. Oh well.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The guitar work on this is really awesome. Amazing album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
yessir.
|
| |
I disagree, this album is way too long. The guitar work is really good and I really like a couple of the tracks, mainly "Postlapsaria," but Billy's lyrics can be really ridiculous sometimes. It's too much to listen to the whole album some times.
|
| |
Good point.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Myeh, still doesn't make this album a 5.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's a strong 4.5 for me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Four for me. Some songs are a snooze.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
The people who rip on this being samey or too teen-underdeveloped need to just stop.
If you can come up for some justification for this that doesn't involve "OMG ANGST" or "OMG ITS A DISCOGRAPHY", I'd love to hear it.
It's too samey. The fact remains that while it wasn't meant to be listened to as a whole, that's how it is packaged to listen to right now, and thus, that's how I'm going to judge it. I can listen to a couple of discographies and not get affected by any sort of lack of variety. I'm not faulting Saetia, I'm just saying I don't enjoy it as much as I possibly could if it wasn't jam packed with subpar material. Granted it's a given with a discography, but that doesn't mean anyone should curb their enjoyment of it for that fact alone.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
You basically say all the time "Oh its a discography, it's not meant to be listened to as a whole". Well, the way it's presented is as this collection, in this order, whether or not the band meant for it to be done that way. You say that you can't knock points for it being too samey or having subpar songs because of it. So what, someone is supposed to neglect a glaring negative quality in it because of that? They are supposed to curve** their score to fit in with how the band wanted the songs to be listened to? I don't think that's at all logical. Rate whatever full length or EP they may have produced a five, but the way this is presented is far from that.
EDIT: Not for nothing, but Billy's lyrics in Hot Cross are wayyyyyy less contrived and overly wordy. This Message Edited On 08.27.07
|
| |
argument isn't going to go anywhere.
|
| |
|
|
