Bring Me the Horizon Count Your Blessings
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i'm being condescending?? haha ok then maybe you should stop being condescending as well. stop being hypocritical

you are saying that hardcore is a style that CAME FROM punk. that's what you just said. so you are saying hardcore is a ROOT of punk. a "sub-genre" of punk if you will. therefore the "punk" label is the one that matters.

Correction
October 31st 2007



188 Comments


foreverendeared, you are a brave motherfucker. However, you are also a stupid one.

Tyler
Emeritus
October 31st 2007



7928 Comments


you are saying that hardcore is a style that CAME FROM punk. that's what you just said. so you are saying hardcore is a ROOT of punk. a "sub-genre" of punk if you will. therefore the "punk" label is the one that matters.

If it's a sub-genre than the punk label is just extra weight; if you're noting it as hardcore, you're going with the notion that it's derived from hardcore. As I said, "punk" is extraneous. It's like saying "this is bebop jazz". It's unnecessary and redundant. Now stop posting. I say this not to be condescending but to keep your ridiculous off topic banter out of the review thread. Seriously.

foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

You're saying that to Cocaine? You must have a death wish.


yes i am, you know why? cause he called me a dipshit for calling a hardcore PUNK band, punk. how funny is that? that is like calling me a dipshit for saying that metallica is metal.
OH! but wait! they are obviously THRASH metal! guess i should stop being a dipshit and call metallica "thrash" metal from now on and not just metal.

idiot

SubtleDagger
October 31st 2007



737 Comments


Minor Threat is hardcore and you called a band that was obviously not hardcore a hardcore band so someone told you to listen to Minor Threat
Please quit backpedaling and accept your retardation already

Tyler
Emeritus
October 31st 2007



7928 Comments


I called you a dipshit for saying the band was "hardcore punk" as opposed to "hardcore". You then argued that it was the case because they were "rooted in punk", an irrelevant point since as you yourself noted (lol contradiction), hardcore was a derivative of punk.

foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I say this not to be condescending but to keep your ridiculous off topic banter out of the review thread


once again stop preaching to me if you arent going to follow your own advice.

you need to look up the word extraneous. it basically means irrelevant. how can the punk label be irrelevant if punk came FIRST. they are a hardcore punk band. you are saying i am wrong abt something i am NOT wrong abt. i might not have labeled the band COMPLETELY right the first time, but they are still punk nonetheless. hardcore punk that is

Zoo
October 31st 2007



3759 Comments


[quote=foreverendeared]idiot[/quote]
To whom, may I ask, is that directed?

Tyler
Emeritus
October 31st 2007



7928 Comments


No, you said they werent hardcore, but rather they were hardcore punk. Punk is irrelevant because it's implied. Christ. Last post on the issue.

roofi
October 31st 2007



959 Comments


ZooYorker, you were just looking for an excuse to get off of comment #666, weren't you?

Zoo
October 31st 2007



3759 Comments


No, I was looking for an excuse to get to comment #667. :D

I'm done spamming here. This a ridiculous argument that ended where I knew it would.

foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Minor Threat is hardcore and you called a band that was obviously not hardcore a hardcore band so someone told you to listen to Minor Threat


i understand this. i was in the wrong. but you still cannot call me a dipshit for calling a hardcore band hardcore punk.

Correction
October 31st 2007



188 Comments


DROP IT
DROP IT
DROP IT
DROP IT
DROP IT!!!!!!!!!!

foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

ok i just want to bring up one last point to the reason why i called THIS band (BMTH) hardcore.

"In the 2000s, The term hardcore has been applied to some bands that play death metal, metalcore or thrash metal. Typical of this new genre are breakdowns and harshly delivered vocals; sometimes verging on death metal growls."

that basically describes this band to a t. just because hardcore is a subgenre from punk THIRTY f'in YEARS ago, does not mean the term hardcore has not changed. it has and it will continue to change just as music labels always do. now do you understand why i called them hardcore? ok i'm done just trying to get you all to understand where i am coming from

Crimson
October 31st 2007



1935 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

No one cares anymore

SubtleDagger
October 31st 2007



737 Comments


There are still hardcore bands around making new music and they sound nothing like BMTH
They actually sound like hardcore

foreverendeared
October 31st 2007



14678 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

^^^ agreed. the bands you are talking are mostly in the majority as far as i know. those that have stuck to the original sound that was hardcore 25 years ago.

Correction
October 31st 2007



188 Comments


HOLY SHIT YOU'RE STILL POSTING

botb
October 31st 2007



9518 Comments


I enjoyed this album... and I believe the particular term for this genre is "deathcore." basically death metal thats been dateraped by breakdowns and other hardcore tendencies.

botb
October 31st 2007



9518 Comments


LOL Josh. :D



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy