Yeah, it's pretty corny, but...oh well.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
2 from me... a 1 is too harsh. I think of alot worse music than this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
2 from me... a 1 is too harsh. I think of alot worse music than this. how i'd hate to be exposed to this
|
| |
I think I'll attempt to stay on the other side of the fights from now on, as well.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I've heard the whole "Lars sounds like he is beating on cans" so many times it isn't even funny.
This album is decidedly average - not good but certainly not as awful as some people make it out to be. The review was tight.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
Well written review, but any sympathy or respect you gave towards this album is completely false. This has to be one of the worst albums of all time. The whole rap/metal trend that was around in the late 90's/ early 2000's made better music than this atrocity of an album. Where the hell were the solos or for that matter, where the hell were the good songs?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I'll agree with basically everyone else... much better review (voted), but some of your statements are still kind of "out there".This Message Edited On 10.06.07
|
| |
[quote=reviewer]The original change in sound ultimately destroyed Metallica from within, and they are dying band, because if you've noticed, their thrash metal peers like Megadeth and Pantera, are well, still around, sounding exactly like they did in the day, even if a bit outdated.[/quote]
Factual error. I can't speak for Megadeth, but not only did Pantera have a fairly significant change in sound from their early releases they disbanded and the guitarist was famously murdered years later.
[quote=reviewer]You have to consider that Metallica didn't want to completely re-hash their thrash of old, and end up making a release like Trivium's The Crusade, thus sounding ultimately VERY old and outdated.[/quote]
I couldn't imagine them revisiting that sound either, i'm sure they COULD if they tried (they can still belt out the old songs in concert) but... it would sound like The Crusade.This Message Edited On 10.06.07
|
| |
They could go back to their old sound, it's just improbable.
|
| |
since when is 6 days a "break from writing reviews"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
since when is 6 days a "break from writing reviews"
He has review writing in his blood. So much so it's pouring out his pores.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Kings Of Thrash!? No way, change it to Inventors Of Thrash and I agree with you.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
oh, id say that Motorhead made some contributions to Thrash Metal too...
And they're considered to be the kings of Thrash because of RtL and MoP. I wouldn't like the band if they hadnt released those two amazing albums.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off
ehh decent review, some really shaky statements, I don't see this as progressive or new at all, I see it has Metallica trying to cash in on the Nu-Metal phase.
|
| |
this was a decent review, but this album is nowhere near as brutal as bands that i would normally listen to. it may be brutal compared to metallica's past work, but not for metal in general.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
their thrash metal peers like Megadeth and Pantera, are well, still around
Hate to tell you, but Pantera broke up then Dimebag died. Just in case you didn't know.
|
| |
hahaha owned.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
[quote=Bfhurricane]
Quote:
their thrash metal peers like Megadeth and Pantera, are well, still around
Hate to tell you, but Pantera broke up then Dimebag died. Just in case you didn't know.[/quote]
HAHHAHAHAHA...way to be oblivious to the most popular Metal band of the 90's...
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
He means Pantera, though Id argue that Metallica were definitely more popular. Still baffles me how the reviewer didnt know that though...
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
[quote=review]St. Anger is the most harsh, aggressive, raw, and brutal metal release perhaps since Slayer's Reign in Blood.[/quote]
[quote=SOH11]Holy **** you are wrong.[/quote]
[quote=tribe]Well, at least this review is better, I took time in writing it, and crafted it nicely, and listened to the criticism.[/quote]
[quote=SOH11]Solid review besides that outlandish statement.[/quote]
[quote=tribe]My music taste isn't the best by Sputnik standards, but much better than yours...how bout looking a bit outside of metal, for once?[/quote]
what an ass, even though you're supposively gone forever.
|
| |
|
|
