Linkin Park Minutes to Midnight
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
renegadestrings
May 16th 2007



1440 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Slaytan:
Hybrid Theory - Good

Reanimation - Bad

Meteora - Ok

Minutes to Midnight - Bad

you have the exact same opinion as i do about every album... so by logical deduction and a love for my hearing and not wanting to be tone deaf... i will avoid this CD

Doppelganger
May 16th 2007



3124 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Yeah, man. You need an open mind for watered down radio rock.

Wizard
May 16th 2007



19343 Comments


Chickenfish,
Linkin Park's new album is a cd you dont need to hear to say that it is horrible because you know what your getting. Watered down radio music always has the same feel and therefore makes for one boring listen.

Digging: Mistigo Varggoth Darkestra - The Key to the Gates of the Apocalypse

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
May 16th 2007



16083 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Honest to god, QWERT made me anticipate this album, and then all of that was dashed and then some. I'd give my own review if I had the time.
Terrible album.

The Sludge
May 16th 2007



2169 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Very disappointing.

Etienne
May 16th 2007



4 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

First of all, let me say that bands, especially the ones as successful as Linkin Park, trying to change their formula should have some credit. It's a risk, and not a lot of people have the guts to do that.

Linkin Park tried.... and failed. Terrible disappointment for me. There's just too much filler on this album, within the songs themselves. There are a few sparks of very good music on M2M, but they're too few and horribly misused. "Bleed It Out" could have been 5 times better if the band actually developed a song instead of turning a 40 seconds intro into a 3 minutes average song.

Doppelganger
May 16th 2007



3124 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I finally just broke down and downloaded this out of interest. I threw up in my mouth a little when "Bleed It Out" first started playing.

Eakflanderyof
May 16th 2007



2143 Comments


First of all, let me say that bands, especially the ones as successful as Linkin Park, trying to change their formula should have some credit. It's a risk, and not a lot of people have the guts to do that.


They did not take a risk with this album at all. Nu-metal is a dying genre and they knew that so they made an album with the next trendy sound. It would have been taking more of a risk to stay with the nu-metal. If you want to see an example of a band taking risks, then look at Ulver.

The Sludge
May 16th 2007



2169 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

To be honest, I don't think there was anything Linkin Park can do to make them sound fresh again. Like no matter what they put out with, it would just be disappointing.

Driven9
May 16th 2007



19 Comments


sorry "Rolling Stone"... This Albim is garbage.

Tyler
Emeritus
May 16th 2007



7926 Comments


yeah what a shitty albim.

renegadestrings
May 16th 2007



1440 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

my roomate did end up buying this album... and wow, i keep wanting to say "i told you so"
it is boooooring

Tyler
Emeritus
May 16th 2007



7926 Comments


my favourite song on this album goes

2 minutes to midnight
To kill the unborn in the womb.



sidfarkus
May 16th 2007



43 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

this is a boring piece of shit album. I was ready for a change of style, but not this light pussy rock ballad crap.

ZFighter142
May 16th 2007



205 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

lmao!!! yea to me it had too many slow songs...way too many... @_@

jagrit001
May 17th 2007



2 Comments


give this album a rating of 4/5 , there is element of good different music .both slow and fast tracks of the album has been appriciated . Numbers like what i ve done , leave it out all the rest , shadow of the day and in peices are currently ruling the charts and mike shinoda’s song hand held high is highly acclamed so a job well done by linkin park .

here are some ratings given by othe websites:

Arrogantics: 4/5
Entertainment Weekly (C) link
IGN:7/10
Kudos Magazine:8/10
Kerrang!:3/5
NME Link:4/10
Planet Sound:5/10
Rolling Stone:4/5
Rock Sound:8/10
The Guardian:3/5
The Los Angeles Times:3/5

(all are Professional reviews taken for all the various sites )



jagrit001
May 17th 2007



2 Comments


Hey let me tell you one thing..........everyone here liked 2-3 songs of this album this was the same as meteora had that why are people critisisng this album i like 8 tracks of thias album and i love this album

please trust me listen to this album freely then comment

Abaddon2005
May 17th 2007



684 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Just because various magazines feel this album is good, doesn't mean it's a fact. Look at AllMusicGuide, they gave it a 2/5 as well.

Altmer
May 17th 2007



5652 Comments


I find AMG to be more accurate than those magazines you mentioned.

Bron-Yr-Aur
May 17th 2007



4405 Comments


please trust me

I can't quite grasp why, but I feel safe complying here.

why are people critisisng this album

Why are people forming any sort of opinions at all for that matter?

Can I comment now?

listen to this album freely then comment


Oh, okay.





You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy