Arcade Fire Neon Bible
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
paperslut
March 2nd 2007


54 Comments


Awesome review. I can't get myself to listen to it more than once a day though.

Zebra
Moderator
March 4th 2007


2647 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I've only listened to this once and I didn't like it all that much. I couldn't remember a single song afterwards, at least Funeral had some memorable moments such as the whole "Neighborhood" songs.

DFelon204409
Emeritus
March 4th 2007


3995 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Okay, so they released two songs before the album came out. One was awesome and had this great organ drone in the background and apparently they recorded it in this special cathedral and it was awesome. Then their other song had this annoying repeating piano rhythm and just plain ate it. So which was does the album slide? Towards the cool song or the miserable one?

La Revolucion
March 4th 2007


1060 Comments


Sort of in the middle.This Message Edited On 03.04.07

DFelon204409
Emeritus
March 4th 2007


3995 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Well that's just freakin' lame now isn't it.

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
March 4th 2007


16089 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I thought it leaned towards the former.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
March 4th 2007


15740 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

No Cars Go is wonderful, I think I'll get this, if just out of curiosity to see how they follow up Funeral.

Digging: Ricky Eat Acid - Three Love Songs

Zmev
March 5th 2007


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Antichrist Television Blues and Black Waves/Bad Vibrations are awesome.

Doesn't stack up against Funeral but not much would.

lunchforthesky
March 6th 2007


1039 Comments


Early contender for album of the year. Im sure it will make my top ten, Funeral is better but only by a little and this is still effortlessly superior to most everyone else in the indie scene.

descendents1
March 6th 2007


702 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

fantastic album, but not near funeral

drags on during the middle, last 4 songs are stellar

MrKite
March 6th 2007


5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This will definitely be a birthday present, I can tell you that.

Two-Headed Boy
March 6th 2007


4527 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

So I was in the store, and I was planning on buying it. Then it came on over the radio and I was like "hey, this isn't that good", so I put it back.

True story.

Mikesn
Emeritus
March 6th 2007


3709 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think I'm going to give this a shot.

trustxdialect
March 6th 2007


1502 Comments


So I was in the store, and I was planning on buying it. Then it came on over the radio and I was like "hey, this isn't that good", so I put it back.

True story.

Ahaha.

JohnXDoesn't
March 6th 2007


1282 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

just heard it. its ok nothing to write home about.

Zmev
March 7th 2007


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

So now that I've given it a twice over in the car this has improved.

Music_Is_My_Life
March 7th 2007


100 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good review.

I think the album really suffers due to the way it was mixed/produced because it just sort of blends together too much and the vocals need to be brought forward more in the mix.

Overall, still a great album though.

JohnXDoesn't
March 7th 2007


1282 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

it just sort of drones on and on. and doesn't anyone write songs anymore? and for being "indie" i've heard it all before. not very original anywhere. meh....sounds like the eighties....and not in a good way...wearing its influences all over its sleeve....This Message Edited On 03.06.07

Zmev
March 7th 2007


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

stfu its great

pulseczar
March 7th 2007


2385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

nah it's not



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy