Ed Sheeran
÷


3.0
good

Review

by Sowing STAFF
March 3rd, 2017 | 265 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Stuck in his daydream, been this way since eighteen.

There isn’t much that can be said about Ed Sheeran’s music anymore that feels novel. He’s a ginger singer-songwriter with an affinity for mixing gorgeous but basic acoustic balladry with awkward, fumbling hip-hop verses. He has a great voice, but it is often squandered on middling, vanilla songwriting that emphasizes billboard success over craft. Sheeran broke out in a big way with 2011’s +, namely because of the single ‘The A Team’, and he has been a pop staple ever since. That’s about as much backstory as is needed before approaching ÷, his third consecutive record to prove his mastery of elementary mathematics. It’s expectedly more of the same; indulging in a handful of heartthrob slow-dance titles while continuing the elusive search for Sheeran’s rhythm as a white rapper. It’s neither the worst thing he’s done nor does it provide any optimism that he’ll eventually ascend to a greater purpose.

‘Castle on the Hill’ was the song that initially offered hope towards some sort of Elton John like coming-of-age (he even name checks ‘Tiny Dancer’), but any hopes of him fulfilling his enormous potential were dashed with the simultaneous release of ‘Shape of You.’ You see, ‘Castle on the Hill’ was a massive step forward for Sheeran, because it proved that he has more than two modes. Ramping up the tempo with a true classic rock aesthetic without losing a trace of romantic imagery (“we watched the sunset over the castle on the hill”) proved to be an excellent happy medium for him, and it offered an out for those who despise both his schmaltzy ballads and his faux hip-hop. An entire album written in a similar mindset might have continued to propel him forward, but ‘Shape of You’ proved that for every step forward, Sheeran will always be ready with another song to anchor us right here in the present – within this empire he’s now built on the foundation of three consecutive records that all mirror each other.

None of this is to say that ÷ has nothing to offer, there’s just very little here that qualifies as new. ‘Dive’ is a slightly watered down version of ‘Thinking Out Loud’, but it’s still quite beautiful, especially when Sheeran gets soulful on the “so don't call me baby” verse. We even get a double dip of starry-eyed passion with ‘Perfect’, another ballad which proves that no matter how many times Sheeran reworks the same general song premise, we’ll keep swooning over his vocals and exquisite delivery of lines like “now I know I have met an angel in person…no, I don’t deserve this.” It’s his bread and butter, and he delivers here in every way we’d expect him to. Opinions may be somewhat divided (pun intended) on his hip-hop/loosely reggae-inspired tracks, but both ‘Eraser’ and ‘Shape of You’ present that side of his music in a tolerable, and at times even surface-level enjoyable, light. The main flaw with ÷ is the same one that has plagued all of his LP's to date: the abundance of cookie-cutter, throwaway tracks that seem to pad every decent song at a 2:1 ratio. For example, nobody who listens to this album will declare ‘Galway Girl’ to be their favorite, and the existence of songs like ‘Happier’ (“but if he breaks your heart like lovers do / just know that I'll be waiting here for you”) only lends credence to the criticism that his music abides to all known clichés in the book.

In every way imaginable, ÷ is just your typical Ed Sheeran record. It would have been nice if he’d given us a reason to ditch the notion of a “typical” Sheeran album by advancing his sound in another direction, but his lack of mobility does not indicate a decline. If + and x got your juices flowing in any way, shape, or form, then ÷ will satisfy whatever it is you got out of those albums. He’s found his niche, and it appears as though he plans to remain settled within it for quite some time. By pop standards you could do a lot worse, but ÷ is not an album that will test the ceiling of Sheeran’s tantalizing potential.



Recent reviews by this author
Bayside There Are Worse Things Than Being AliveAaron West and The Roaring Twenties In Lieu Of Flowers
Vampire Weekend Only God Was Above UsSum 41 Heaven :x: Hell
Wild Pink Strawberry EraserWaxahatchee Tigers Blood
user ratings (402)
2.1
poor
other reviews of this album
AngryJohnny (1)
Gingermania is running wild...

MercuryToHell (4)
By subtracting any undue pretensions and adding purely songs that play to his strengths, Sheeran wil...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Sowing
Moderator
March 3rd 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

TL;DR: The male Taylor Swift releases his third album to lukewarm applause and some fan girl screams. Also, fuck Atlantic Records for not allowing me to embed a single one of the songs on this record in its full length. It's not like Ed Sheeran songs are hard to come by for streaming.

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
March 3rd 2017


11561 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"nobody who listens to this album will declare ‘Galway Girl’ to be their favorite"



damn i like that one a lot for some reason

guitarded_chuck
March 3rd 2017


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

that video where hes training as a boxer and is acting all hard makes me lose my shit lmao

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
March 3rd 2017


10024 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

nice review Sowing. never been huge on Sheeran's work, so I'll most likely skip this one

TVC15
March 3rd 2017


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

X is my fav by him so I suppose I'll like this huh?

DrMaximus
March 3rd 2017


12807 Comments


What's with this fuckin guy and math operations?

DinosaurJones
March 3rd 2017


10402 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Whatever happened to Jason Mraz? He's like the better version of Ed Sheeran.

Artuma
March 3rd 2017


32762 Comments


it shouldn't be too hard to guess what his next album will be titled as

Sowing
Moderator
March 3rd 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Square root, no doubt



Artuma
March 3rd 2017


32762 Comments


that would prolly be a little too ambitious for him. i was thinking -

DinosaurJones
March 3rd 2017


10402 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I personally hope it's Pi.





guitarded_chuck
March 3rd 2017


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

almost as dumb as the shit bon ivers been trying to pull

Sowing
Moderator
March 3rd 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

3D $H33R@N

guitarded_chuck
March 3rd 2017


18070 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

$ |-| @ ⓟ £ Ø ƒ ¥ 0 Ü

DinosaurJones
March 3rd 2017


10402 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

goddamn.



The worst part is that there are people that actually type like that.

Sowing
Moderator
March 3rd 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

lol idiots



but if they ever put out an album I'll 5 it because

Tunaboy45
March 3rd 2017


18421 Comments


All I've heard people talking about today is how amazing and emotional this album is, how sad Supermarket Flowers is

I'm fed up already

MercuryToHell
March 3rd 2017


1362 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Sorry to hear you didn't dig this as much as I did, Sowing. I'm adoring 'Dive' right now.

Sowing
Moderator
March 3rd 2017


43941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I love Dive. Perfect and Castle on the Hill are also amazing.



It's hit or miss like all his stuff though.

TVC15
March 3rd 2017


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"$ |-| @ ⓟ £ Ø ƒ ¥ 0 Ü"



Leaked title of Bon Iver's new album?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy