Ne Obliviscaris
Citadel


5.0
classic

Review

by Telekinetic USER (12 Reviews)
May 7th, 2015 | 48 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: a large change that does not compromise integrity

It’s one thing for a release to be praised almost unanimously across the internet, but it's another when a release is only a debut, independently recorded, and contains a song that is already a part of the curriculum at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music, it is safe to say that that release has multiple strong arguments to support Ne Obliviscaris as being one of the most relevant and talented bands out there.

But there are a few things that made me worry about this release. All of the songs on Portal of I were written from the time period of 2005 to 2009 and the album was released in 2012. In 2009, Ne Obliviscaris got a new lead guitarist. This new guitarist had written most of the content on this album. A new guitarist for any band can be risky business. Well it is safe to say that that is not the case on Citadel. One thing you will notice right of the bat is that this is still the Ne Obliviscaris that most have come to love. This is not to say that Ne Obliviscaris has not changed. They have made quite a few tweaks to their sound. The ambiance on this album is different, there is a larger sense of coherency, consists of only three songs split into six tracks, and is 22 to 23 minutes shorter than their world renowned debut.

This album, while still sounding like the Ne Obliviscaris we have all come to love, is a completely different beast than Portal of I. Whether it’s the change of guitarist or general consensus of the band to head in this direction, the result is very pleasing either way. Unlike Portal of I, Citadel starts off slowly with an ambient intro. Then it doesn't ease but fits itself perfectly like one jigsaw puzzle piece to another, into part two of the song (the second track) which is a sixteen and a half minute epic. It has three movements which shows almost all sides of Ne Obliviscaris from the death/black metal roots to the classically influenced songwriting. The only thing that is not on the epic and the entire album are the flamenco guitars with the violin on top which was one of my favorite aspects of Portal of I. While this may kill this album for some, don’t be alarmed. There is a new feature that may win you over that incorporates the violin and the electric guitar which comes up in both the first and second song. This is when they create harmony on the same octave to make a really unique sound that has never occurred on Portal of I or any other album I have heard. Not only is there this new feature but there are a ton of new approaches to their music that strengthens every aspect of Ne Obliviscaris’s sound while still keeping many of the older elements we all loved in Portal of I.



The only thing that I would say did not work out as well on Citadel is the ending. I have to admit that the ending of Citadel was a bit darker and honestly felt like it was played more on the safe side And felt kind of anticlimactic compared to the ending of Portal of I. But in all honesty, it’s a matter of opinion as to whether one album is better than the other because they are both so different aesthetically. The primary importance of Citadel is that it shows that Ne Obliviscaris is versatile not just on a song level but on an album level and shows that they are willing to take huge risks and has hit the mark on 99% of this album. The one I have to give true kudos to is their new guitarist because while he only performed on Portal of I he did not write any of the content and he had a huge standard to live up to and definitely has and we shall see what he and the rest of Ne Obliviscaris have to offer in the future.



Recent reviews by this author
Deafheaven New BermudaPriapus/Old Painless Split
Napalm Death Apex Predator - Easy MeatMaruta Remain Dystopian
Rotten Sound CursedMouth Of The Architect The Ties That Blind
user ratings (994)
4.1
excellent
other reviews of this album
Drew Tyler (4.5)
Ne Obliviscaris are proving once more to be a hard band to label. 2014's Citadel finds the band perf...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Haven't written one of these in a while, constructive criticism is very welcome

Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

might add another paragraph the first two are just rambling

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
May 7th 2015


11564 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Got a bit of a problem with run on sentences. Work on getting your points across in a more concise manner. That's the biggest issue here though.

beefshoes
May 7th 2015


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"it is safe to say that Ne Obliviscaris has multiple strong arguments to back them up as being one of the most relevant and talented bands out there"



.....like?



This could benefit from some proofreading and editing, and there's quite a bit of hyperbole and idiomatic language throughout the review. Other than that, it wasn't bad.

Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Thanks I'll start working on them now

Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Fixed (I think)

beefshoes
May 7th 2015


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Sweet, and I gave it a pos.



Flugmorph
May 7th 2015


34034 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I like the violins...

IronGiant
May 7th 2015


1752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I really miss the flamenco-styled guitars...

beefshoes
May 7th 2015


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I miss when they didn't double track the harsh vox....

Also, I wish they'd get a new drummer and ditch the annoying bic pen bass drum triggers.

Sevengill
May 7th 2015


11972 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Album is brilliant and so much easier to listen to than Portal. Good review. Your style's a little more colloquial than most, but there's nothing wrong with describing what you thought of the album so long as you explain it well.

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
May 7th 2015


60295 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Although nicely articulated, most of this is one giant piece of fangirl. Not gonna neg, but you'd better cut the objectively phrased opinions if you want to see a pos from me.

trackbytrackreviews
May 7th 2015


3469 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Correct rating

Sevengill
May 7th 2015


11972 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

album is worth fangirling over.

emester
May 7th 2015


8271 Comments


Not the case for me.

For almost everything the album does right (Instrumentation, being a much more concise album than Portals), theres flaws, such as the vocal performance, the overall production, and the fact that the tracks seem to lose steam over time to bring the whole thing down for me.

emester
May 7th 2015


8271 Comments


Oh snap!

Whats weird is that I still dig Portal a slight bit more than this. Whatever the case though I have to admit the violins are utilized on this superbly

Sevengill
May 7th 2015


11972 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Tim Charles, man. Xenoyr is a pretty great vocalist and all but that violin is what makes this band.

beefshoes
May 7th 2015


8443 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I love Portal, but to me, this album is way more complete and polished when it comes to performances and songwriting. Portal might still be more entertaining to listen to though, and this album's production annoys me to no end.

Sevengill
May 7th 2015


11972 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I fail to see what's so bad about the production. Not kvlt enough? The drums sounds a little too triggered, I guess.

Telekinetic
May 7th 2015


82 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

The drumming is probably why the band is labeled black metal



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy